Evaluation of Functional Orthodontic Treatment on Sleep Quality

October 25, 2024 updated by: Gökçenur Gökçe Kara

Polygraphic Evaluation of the Effects of Functional Orthodontic Treatment with Twin Block and Herbst Appliances on Sleep Quality: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Functional appliances are used in the treatment of Class II anomalies caused by mandibular rethrognathia. Herbst which is a fixed and rigid functional appliance and TWB which is removable appliance can be successful in the treatment of mandibular retrognathia in a short period of six to eight months during the pubertal growth phase. An increase in the upper airway size occurs as a result of functional orthopedic treatment devices eliminating the problem of mandibular retrognathia and stimulating mandibular growth. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of TWB and Herbst appliances on sleep quality in children with obstructive sleep apnea. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference for the sleep quality between the appliances.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: This multicenter clinical study aimed to investigate the effects of twin block (TB) and Herbst functional appliances on sleep quality in children with OSAS and mandibular retrognathia. Methods: A total of 46 patients having mandibular retrognathia and identified with OSA were divided randomly into two groups: twin block (TB) and Herbst functional appliances. Changes in sleep parameters at baseline and an avarage of 8-month follow-up detected by polygraphy and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were the primary outcome. Treatment of the mandibular retrognathia was the secondary outcome. hapiro Wilk test and Q-Q graphs were used to examine the distribution assumptions of continuous variables according to groups. Mann Whitney U test was used to evaluate two independent group means or distributions of continuous measurements. Paired sample t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the differences between the baseline and follow-up times at p < 0.05 significance level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey
        • Gökçenur Gökçe Kara

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • no prior orthodontic treatment, nasal, tonsillar, or adenoid surgery
  • absence of any oral, nasal or systemic disease
  • the existence of skeletal Class II and dental Class II Division 1 malocclusion (ANB >4°; SNB <80°; incisor overjet >3 mm)
  • requiring functional orthodontic treatment
  • Individuals are in the MP3cap and S period according to hand-wrist films, and in the CS3 and CS4 period using the CVM method
  • patients with OSA (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI)>1/h

Exclusion Criteria:

  • body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 (weight (kg)/height (m2))
  • the presence of nasopharyngeal pathologies, craniofacial anomalies, , systemic disorder, or weak oral hygiene
  • history of previous orthodontic treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Herbst
The Herbst appliance is fixed and rigid functional appliance. It consists of attachments (casted splints) in the lateral segments of both jaws which are connected by a telescoping mechanism from the upper posterior to the lower anterior region resulting in mandibular bite jumping.

The patients were treated with Twin block and Herbst functional appliances. Alginate impressions and a protrusive wax bite were taken for the construction of each appliance. Each device was fitted and then reviewed 4-6 weeks later. First group was treated with Twin block which was manufactured basically according to the original design described by Clark. The overjet was measured from the patients in centric relationship and maximum protrusion position, and construction bite was recorded with 70% of the total advancement capacity of the mandible and 2-4 mm above the freeway space vertically. Overjet measurements were made at each session and active treatment was terminated when a normal overjet in the retracted position was recorded.

Second group was treated with the stainless-steel crown Herbst appliance, included crowned maxillary first molars and mandibular first premolars. The construction bite was recorded with the mandible forward by edge-to-edge incisor position.

Experimental: Twin Block

Twin-block appliance is used with two separate acrylic plates for the lower and upper jaw.

It consists of acrylic bite blocks that lock together at a 70° angle, allowing the mandible to be positioned in front.

The patients were treated with Twin block and Herbst functional appliances. Alginate impressions and a protrusive wax bite were taken for the construction of each appliance. Each device was fitted and then reviewed 4-6 weeks later. First group was treated with Twin block which was manufactured basically according to the original design described by Clark. The overjet was measured from the patients in centric relationship and maximum protrusion position, and construction bite was recorded with 70% of the total advancement capacity of the mandible and 2-4 mm above the freeway space vertically. Overjet measurements were made at each session and active treatment was terminated when a normal overjet in the retracted position was recorded.

Second group was treated with the stainless-steel crown Herbst appliance, included crowned maxillary first molars and mandibular first premolars. The construction bite was recorded with the mandible forward by edge-to-edge incisor position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correction of mandibular retrognathia
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
A normal or corrected overjet in the retracted position
Following 6-8 months active treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in apnea hypopnea index (AHI)
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in number of apnea and hypopnea
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in number of hypopnea
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in desaturation index
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in lowest desaturation
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in average saturation
Following 6-8 months active treatment
Polygraphic assessment of sleep parameters
Time Frame: Following 6-8 months active treatment
Changes in the value of Supin AHI
Following 6-8 months active treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gökçenur Gökçe Kara, Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea Syndromes in Children

Clinical Trials on Functional orthodontic treatment

Subscribe