Development of Digital Services for Parkinson's Disease

January 29, 2025 updated by: University of Exeter

Development of Digital Diagnostics and Intervention Services for Parkinson's Disease

In this project, ocular motor, pupil and gait data in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) will be collected in order to develop machine learning models for the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. With this, the investigators aim to advance the state of the art in PD diagnosis and monitoring. By integrating the principles of machine learning with high-quality sensor data, more accurate and earlier diagnosis could potentially be achieved. Ocular motor and pupil data will be collected with the standard clinical examination and with neos, a medical device approved for objective ocular motor and pupil measurement. Gait will be collected using an IMU sensor and GaitQ senti, a consumer device that allows for an objective and continuous remote gait monitoring.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases worldwide, affecting 1% of the population older than 65.

Currently, PD diagnosis is based on history, clinical assessments, and neurological examination.

The most widely used criteria for diagnosis are the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria and instrument (i.e. The MDS-UPDRS). Further information may be gained from people's subjective description of their symptoms and/or via some short walking tests, such as 3-meter Timed Up and Go (TUG) performed as a snapshot in the clinic. However, people's symptoms vary through and between days and subjective descriptions rely on their memory and observations at home. These recollections can be unreliable or lack enough detail (particularly when the person has cognitive impairment). Therefore, current PD diagnosis criteria are highly dependent on the person and on the diagnosing physician. This subjectivity may lead to a variability in the diagnosis. Furthermore, these clinical assessments are unable to accurately track disease progression over time, making it difficult to provide personalized care. Additionally, manual examinations lack precise measurement instruments, resulting in a low precision of observed measurements and the inability to detect early-stage, subclinical signs. An objective diagnosis based on quantitative data rather than subjective interpretation of clinical findings is important. Therefore, an early and accurate diagnosis of PD, as well as accurate disease progression monitoring, are still important challenges in PD.

Several oculo-visual abnormalities have been described in PD. Studies report an abnormal ocular motor function in 75-87.5% of people with PD. These dysfunctions may precede or follow motor symptoms and thus, the evaluation of ocular motor function may provide valuable information regarding early disease detection or disease progression. The most commonly reported ocular motor dysfunctions are impairments in saccades, smooth pursuit, and vergence.

Gait impairments are among the most common and disabling symptoms of PD. Gait impairments include freezing of gait (FOG), an inability to initiate or maintain normal walking patterns, often resulting in a stochastic stop/start gait, and festinating gait (FSG), which is a shortening of stride length with elevated step frequency, resulting in fast, shuffling steps. Both FOG and FSG contribute to an increased risk of falls (and fall-related injuries) in people with PD relative to the wider elderly population. Objective, and continuous remote gait monitoring would be highly important in people with PD, to objectively track gait impairments in real-time, and potentially contribute to objectively track disease progression, which may lead to personalized care for individuals with PD.

In this project, ocular motor, pupil and gait data in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) will be collected in order to develop machine learning models for the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. With this, the investigators aim to advance the state of the art in PD diagnosis and monitoring. By integrating the principles of machine learning with high-quality sensor data, more accurate and earlier diagnosis could potentially be achieved. Ocular motor and pupil data will be collected with the standard clinical examination and with neos, a medical device approved for objective ocular motor and pupil measurement. Gait will be collected using an IMU sensor and GaitQ senti, a consumer device that allows for an objective and continuous remote gait monitoring.

The primary objective of this project is to collect ocular motor, pupil and gait data from people with PD in order to develop and compare machine learning models for diagnosing and monitoring PD.

Secondary objectives are:

Correlate ocular motor, pupil and gait parameters with several clinical parameters, including the MDS-UPDRS.

Collect real-world evidence (RWE) data regarding health economics parameters to address the individual and combined properties, effects, and/or impacts of the deployed health technologies.

By analysing the data collected, we also aim to contribute to the scientific understanding of PD, potentially uncovering new insights into disease patterns, progression, and response to treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria Participants with Parkinson's [Phase 1,2,3,4]

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (UK Brain Bank Criteria) or other appropriate condition specific scale [stroke, multiple sclerosis, arthritis or osteoporosis]
  • Able to self-report history of daily gait freezing and/or festination for people with PD or gait and/or transfers affected by condition
  • Able to walk unsupported or using an aid for at least 5 minutes and satisfactory completion of the Canadian PARQ and if over 69 used to carrying out this level of exercise
  • Adult (+18 years old)
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (Snellen Visual Acuity > 12/18) or safe to mobilise with support
  • Montreal Cognitive assessment score >21 or ability to follow 2 stage commands

Healthy participants [Phase 1,2,3]

  • With no long-term conditions affecting movement
  • Able to walk unsupported or using an aid for at least 3 minutes and satisfactory completion of the Canadian PARQ and if over 69 used to carrying out this level of exercise
  • Adult (+18 years old)
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (Snellen Visual Acuity > 12/18) or safe to mobilise with support
  • Montreal Cognitive assessment score >21 or ability to follow 2 stage commands

Exclusion criteria Participants with Parkinson's

  • Any physical or mental condition affecting ability to safely participate in this level of activity and capacity to understand testing as demonstrated by ability to safely follow commands and pass the PARQ by the research team.
  • Cognitive impairment affecting ability to safely participate and follow instructions
  • Any injury or disorder that may affect balance (other than Parkinson's or referring primary condition)
  • Any skin conditions or broken skin in the calf and behind knee area
  • Deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implants or other implant that may interfere with the measurement system
  • Medications likely to affect eye sight or use of virtual reality sytstem

Healthy participants

  • Any physical or mental condition affecting ability to safely participate in this level of activity and capacity to understand testing as demonstrated by ability to safely follow commands and pass the PARQ by the research team.
  • Cognitive impairment affecting ability to safely participate and follow instructions
  • Any injury or disorder that may affect balance (other than Parkinson's or referring primary condition)
  • Any skin conditions or broken skin in the calf and behind knee area
  • Deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implants or other implants that may interfere with the measurement system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Feasibility of using the MachineMD and gaitQ devices
To complete gaitQ and MachineMD digital feasibility assessment and intervention service development

Participants will be invited to participate in the following sequential phases. Participants can participate in Phases as selected. Control participants will not be invited to Phase 4.

Phase 1. Lab testing [2 hours] Validation study of digital technology measures MachineMD and gaitQ to criterion metric of UPDRS.

Phase 2. home/community testing [2 weeks daily] Determine feasibility of daily measuring in the home of gaitQ to determine usability, acceptability, and day to day variability of measurement metrics and to determine concurrent validation of home metric to lab metrics to determine, reliability, concurrent validity of change, minimal detectable change and criterion validation to lab-based measures.

Phase 3. Lab retesting [2 hours] see Phase 1

Phase 4. Home/community intervention [2 weeks] Determine the potential for effect of the gaitQ vibration intervention from a 2-week exposure in the home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step length
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Step length (measured in meters) during the gait tasks (TUG, 5 sit to stand, 15-m walk, 5-min walk).
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Step rate
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Step rate (measured in steps per minute) will be measured during the gait tasks (TUG, 5 sit to stand, 15-m walk, 5-min walk).
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Step length symmetry index
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).

Step length symmetry index will be calculated using the following equation:

[((R - L)/0.5 × (R + L)) × 100], where R: right leg, L: left leg

From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Walking speed
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Walking speed (meters per second) will be measured during the gait activities (TUG, 5 sit to stand, 15-m walk, 5-min walk).
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
The time (in seconds) to complete the Timed Up and Go task will be recorded.
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Five times Sit to Stand
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
The time (in seconds) a person needs to stand up from a standard height chair and sit back down five times.
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
15-m Walk
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
The time (in seconds) needed to cover 15 meters in straight line walking
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
5-min Walk
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
The distance a participant walks in 5 minutes (measured in meters and can round to the nearest decimal place).
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Safety of the gaitQ device
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to the end of the intervention (up to 6 weeks).
Safety of the gaitQ device will be assessed by recording the adverse events (expected and unexpected).
From lab visit 1 to the end of the intervention (up to 6 weeks).
Usability of the gaitQ device
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to the end of the intervention (up to 6 weeks).
Usability of the gaitQ device will be assessed through successful establishment of a system usability scale target >68 and through the number of therapy support sessions required.
From lab visit 1 to the end of the intervention (up to 6 weeks).
Ocular motor and pupil function - Standard manual test
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Ocular motor and pupil function scores derived from gaze (left, centre, right), ocular alignment, pupilary function, saccades (horizontal, vertical), smooth pursuit, visual field screening, and convergence.
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Ocular motor and pupil function - Neos device
Time Frame: From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).
Ocular motor and pupil function scores derived from gaze (left, centre, right), ocular alignment, pupilary function, saccades (horizontal, vertical), smooth pursuit, visual field screening, and convergence.
From lab visit 1 to lab visit 2 (up to 3 weeks).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Dawes, PhD, University of Exeter

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-24-18
  • 10086932 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Innovate UK UKRI; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) grant (Product development award))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on gait with cueing wearable device and neuro-ocular performance

Subscribe