ChemoRT With and Without Dental Stent for Taste Protection in NPC Patients

December 10, 2024 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

Chemoradiotherapy With and Without Dental Stent for Taste Protection in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Primary objective:

Evaluate and compare incidence of acute and long-term taste dysfunction in chemoradiation plus dental stent group vs. chemoradiation group, using objective-measured taste strip test, and patient-reported taste ability and toxicity.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Evaluate and compare incidence of acute and long-term toxicities (excluding taste) and patient-reported quality of life between chemoradiation plus dental stent group and chemoradiation group.
  2. Evaluate and compare tumor response, overall survival, and failure-free survival between chemoradiation plus dental stent group and chemoradiation group.
  3. Analyze dosimetric parameters of taste bud bearing tongue mucosa, ipsilateral/ contralateral parotid and submandibular glands extracted from RT plans and correlate with taste impair

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This study is a phase II randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of adding a dental stent for sparing the taste bud and protect the taste sensation in NPC patients undergoing chemoradiation. The enrolled participants will be randomized to add a personalized dental stent during the radical chemoradiation to nasopharynx and neck using IMRT technique. Chemoradiation must begin no later than 4 weeks from the time of recruitment, although treatment as early as possible is highly encouraged.

A total of 50 patients (25 patients each arm) will be accrued to assess the potential benefit and safety of the said dental stent to standard chemoradiation.

All participants will be followed up as follows:

  1. One visit before induction chemotherapy (if any)
  2. One visit within 6 weeks before RT
  3. Weekly during treatment and at the end of treatment (6-7 visits depending on treatment schedule),
  4. One visit at 4 weeks post treatment (with +/-2 weeks window period)
  5. One visit at 12 weeks post treatment (with +/- 4 weeks window period)
  6. One visit at 26 weeks post treatment (with +/-4 weeks window period) and
  7. One visit at 52 weeks post treatment (with +/-4 weeks window period) to review their general condition, toxicities, and long-term treatment efficacy and safety profile.

The assessment of taste sensation using subjective questionnaires, alongside objective measures using taste strip tests are performed at baseline, the 12 weeks post treatment follow up and at the 52 weeks post treatment follow up visits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • Recruiting
        • National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shing Fung Lee, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Balamurugan A Vellayappan, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lea Choung Wong, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francis Ho, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yiat Horng Leong, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pui Lam Jessie Yip, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chong Meng Tay, MBBS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Teng Hwee Tan, MBBS
      • Singapore, Singapore, 117599

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed non-keratinizing NPC.
  2. Patients with Tumours staged as T1-4N+/TxN0-3.
  3. No sign of distant metastasis (M0).
  4. Satisfactory performance status (i.e., Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70 or ECOG < 2)
  5. Age 21 years or older.
  6. Adequate bone marrow function by peripheral blood counts as demonstrated by the following laboratory values:

    1. ≥ 3 × 109/L leucocytes
    2. ≥ 1.5 × 109/L neutrophils
    3. ≥ 9 g/dL of haemoglobin, and
    4. ≥ 100 × 109/L platelets.
  7. Normal liver function demonstrated by the following laboratory values:

    1. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) concentrations of < 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    2. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) concentration < 2.5x ULN
    3. Bilirubin < ULN.
  8. Renal function: Creatinine clearance at ≥60 mL/min
  9. Able to provide informed consent

7. Induction chemotherapy before radical chemoradiation to nasopharynx and neck is permissible if no disease progression after induction chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Edentulous patients
  2. Extensive crown/ implant work to the teeth
  3. Patients having basaloid squamous cell carcinoma or WHO keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma.
  4. Patients who suffered from previous malignancies, except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, and in-situ cervical cancer.
  5. Received RT previously (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside the intended RT treatment area)
  6. Patients who received previous surgery (except diagnostic) or chemotherapy for the primary tumours or lymph nodes or history of glossectomy.
  7. Patient who had a prior diagnosis of diseases effecting saliva secretion or causing salivary glands impairment (i.e., Sjogren's syndrome, iodine cancer treatment), had a reported history of abnormal sense of taste or eating disorders.
  8. Current heavy smokers (smoke > 1 pack/day) or previous heavy smokers (stopped smoking less than 2 years and had smoked > 1 pack/day).
  9. Patients suffering from any severe intercurrent disease, which may incur unacceptable risk or negatively affect trial compliance. For example, unstable cardiac disease necessitating treatment, chronic hepatitis renal disease, poorly controlled diabetes (fasting plasma glucose greater 1.5x upper limit of normal), and emotional disturbance.
  10. Pregnant or lactating women.
  11. Inability to attend the full course of RT or planned follow-up/survey responses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Radiotherapy with dental stent +/- Concurrent systemic therapy
Dental stent is personalised device for tongue depressing and immobilisation during RT. The aims are to reduce unnecessary RT doses to adjacent non-target healthy tissue, including the tongue, adjacent oral mucosa, parotid glands/ submandibular glands, and temporomandibular joints. Dentists will take impression of the teeth on moulds, and measure the height to raise the bite, the stent is then fabricated as methyl methacrylate resin in the dental laboratory. The resin base extends to the tongue and a flat plate depresses the tongue. This device will be placed before each RT fraction.
Other: Control
Radiotherapy with no dental stent +/- Concurrent systemic therapy
No dental stent used during chemoradiation treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-assessed taste impairment using the QLQ-HN43 module
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Patient-assessed taste impairment measured on 4-point verbal rating scale, ranging from none to severe using the QLQ-HN43 module.
From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Taste impairment assessed on NCI CTCAE version 5.0 grading
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post RT
Taste alterations (dysgeusia) will be graded between Grades 0 to 2.
From baseline to 52 weeks post RT
Taste impairment measured on the STTA scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
The STTA scale modified from the Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic is a scoring system for taste acuity ranging from Grades 0 to 4
From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Objective testing using test strips
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Taste strips are a validated approach to assess taste ability for the five primary taste modalities - sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami.
From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute toxicities (other than taste) graded according to NCI CTCAE V5.0
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Other toxicities experienced by the patients during treatment. For example, dermatitis, mucositis, dry mouth will be graded according to the CTCAE V5.0 scales.
From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Acute toxicities (other than taste) graded according to the STTA scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Other toxicities experienced by the patients during treatment will be graded according to the STTA scale.
From baseline to 52 weeks post-RT
Patient-reported QoLs between the 2 groups according to EORTC modules QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN43
Time Frame: From enrollment to 52 weeks after the end of treatment
EORTC QLQ-C30 and specific module for head and neck EORTC QLQ-HN43 will be used.
From enrollment to 52 weeks after the end of treatment
OS, FFS, distant FFS, and locoregional FFS between the 2 groups measured in years and months
Time Frame: From enrollment to 52 weeks after the end of treatment
FFS was defined as the interval between randomization and distant failure, locoregional failure, or death from any cause, whichever happened first. OS was defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. The distant FFS was defined as the interval from randomization to the first distant metastasis. The locoregional FFS was defined as the interval from randomization to the first local or regional recurrence.
From enrollment to 52 weeks after the end of treatment
Dosimetry doses measured in Gy
Time Frame: From the first radiation therapy to the end of the radiation therapy at 6-7 weeks
The mean, minimum, and maximum doses measured in gray (Gy) to the taste bud bearing tongue mucosa, the ipsilateral- and contralateral parotid and submandibular glands are extracted from the RT plans.
From the first radiation therapy to the end of the radiation therapy at 6-7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Cheo, MBBS, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Dental stent

Subscribe