Comparative Effectiveness of Oxiris Hemofilters Versus Conventional Hemofilters in Septic Patients

Comparative Effectiveness of Oxiris Filters Versus Conventional Hemofilters in Septic Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

We divided patients in 2 groups. First group was the patients who received Oxiris filters during CRRT. Second group was the patiens who have received CRRT filters other than Oxiris.

We compared the lab parameters (Urea, Creatinin, Lactate, ABG parameters and SOFA escore with together.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

426

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

study population includes patients who have admission on our clinic for more than 5 days and diagnosed with sepsis who has CRRT indication

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

sepsis diagnosis CRRT indication

Exclusion Criteria:

patients under age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Oxiris
The group which we used oxiris filter for CRRT.
Hemodiafiltration
Non-Oxiris
The group which we used other filters like M150 for CRRT.
Hemodiafiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SOFA Score
Time Frame: 6 month
We compared SOFA scores of patients on admission and on 5th day.
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival comparison
Time Frame: 6 month
We compared patients survival rates between two group.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-05-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cytokine

Clinical Trials on CRRT

Subscribe