Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Training for Teachers and Young Children for Social Emotional and Ethical Development (SEED) (SEED)

March 22, 2026 updated by: Winnie W.S. MAK, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Training for Teachers and Young Children for Social Emotional and Ethical Development (SEED)-Randomized Controlled Trial

The objectives of the present study are to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of implementing teachers' training on mindfulness and developing their competency in delivering the Social, Emotional, and Ethical Development (SEED) curriculum to preschool children and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the SEED curriculum at kindergartens in improving children's well-being and related outcomes. Randomized controlled trials will be conducted to investigate the effectiveness of SEED teacher training and the SEED Curriculum. A minimum of four kindergartens will be recruited to participate in the study. Half of the kindergartens, teachers, and children will receive the training and SEED curriculum, while the other half will be assigned to the waitlist control condition. Upon informed consent from the school principals and parents, teachers will receive mindfulness training and complete pre- and post-training assessments, and one-month follow-up assessments. Teachers will be taught 8 mindfulness exercises to be integrated into daily teaching and students in the intervention group will receive a 30-minute lesson of SEED curriculum per week, 12 weeks in duration, led by the Bodhi Love Foundation SEED trainers. Parents and students will complete assessments before intervention and after intervention(in the 12th week).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the World Health Organization, early child development lays a critical foundation for healthy habits and long-term development, including health and well-being, as well as changing the trajectory of the next generation in maximizing human potential. Specifically, social-emotional learning (SEL) in early childhood lays the foundation for their later adjustment, including better emotional wellness and fewer internalizing and externalizing problems. Recently, numerous SEL programs have been developed worldwide. Among these evidence-based SEL programs, the Kindness Curriculum is a secular mindfulness-based SEL program designed for children between 4-6 years of age.

In Hong Kong, the Kindergarten Education Curriculum Guide has identified affective and social development as a major objective in early childhood. Better social-emotional competence is associated with preschool-aged children's lower anxiety and fewer aggressive behaviors in Hong Kong. However, the implementation of evidence-based SEL programs remains immature, with very few programs available for kindergartens and kindergarten-cum-child care settings and none being mindfulness-based. In response to fulfilling children's psychosocial needs, the Bodhi Love Foundation (BLF) has adapted the Kindness Curriculum for young children in Hong Kong. With the concerted efforts of a team of qualified local mindfulness teachers and Prof. Daniel Goleman as the advisor, the curriculum was translated from English to Chinese and has been adapted for implementation in the local cultural context. The adapted Kindness Curriculum, renamed as Social, Emotional, Ethical Development Curriculum (SEED), is a two-part program involving training teachers on mindfulness and delivery of SEED to young children. As such, the curriculum may be beneficial for both teachers and children.

The project's significance is to cultivate mindfulness and loving-kindness among our teachers and children to equip them with the mindset and skills needed for self-care and the promotion of mental well-being. Such well-being promotion and distress prevention approach that starts early in childhood lays a critical cornerstone for children to develop healthily, which can potentially reduce the incidence of mental illness among younger generations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Dept of Psychology, CUHK, Hong Kong,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For children: aged 3-7 years old, understand Cantonese
  • For parents: aged 18 years old or above, understand Cantonese
  • For teachers: aged 18 years old or above, understand Cantonese, currently working at a kindergarten

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cannot understand Cantonese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Social, Emotional, and Ethical Development (SEED) curriculum
The kindergarten teachers and children will receive training and 12-week SEED curriculum. Upon informed consent from the school principals and parents, teachers will receive mindfulness training and complete pre- and post-training assessments, and a one-month follow-up assessments. Teachers will be taught 8 mindfulness exercise to integrate into the daily teaching and students in intervention group will receive a 30-min lesson of SEED curriculum per week, 12-weeks in total, lead by the Bohdi Love Foudation tutors. Parents and students will complete questionnaries and assessments pre- and post-intervention.
In response to fulfilling children's urgent psychosocial needs, the Bodhi Love Foundation (BLF) adapted the Kindness Curriculum for young children in Hong Kong by translating it from English to Chinese and adapting its length and content for implementation in the local kindergarten context. The adapted Kindness Curriculum, renamed as Social, Emotional, and Ethical Development curriculum (SEED), is a two-part program involving teacher training and delivery of SEED. The teacher training is consist of a 12-hour mindfulness course and a 1-day (6 hours) workshop to get familiarized with the understanding and practice of mindfulness, and the details of the SEED Curriculum. The SEED Curriculum involves 8 short sessions of basic techniques in mindfulness with 10 minutes each. In addition, it has 12 mindfulness-based lessons with specific themes for children in K1 and K2. Each lesson lasts for approximately 30-40 minutes.
No Intervention: Waitlist control group
Two kindergartens will be assigned to the waitlist control condition. Teachers in the waitlist control schools will wait for at least 12 weeks before they receive the training, and children in the waitlist control group will receive SEED curriculum after the teachers' training. Upon informed consent from the school principals and parents, teachers will complete pre-, post-, and 4-week follow-up assessments about their mindfulness and relevant concept. Parents will complete pre- and post- questionnaires about the adjustment of the child. Children will complete pre- and post- assessment tasks with experimenters.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mindfulness in Teaching Scale(MTS)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The 14-item Mindfulness in Teaching Scale(MTS) will be used to assess the extent to which teachers are consciously aware of various classroom and student activities. It contains 2 subscales measuring teacher intrapersonal and interpersonal mindfulness. Items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = never, to 5 = always). The total score of each dimension is obtained by summing the respective items, with higher scores indicating greater levels of Teacher Intrapersonal Mindfulness (ranging from 9 to 45) and Teacher Interpersonal Mindfulness (ranging from 5 to 25).
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
he personal burnout and work-related burnout subscale in Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) will be used to measure teachers' burnout in three domains: and client-related burnout. CBI shows good reliability for each subscale (Cronbach's alpha = .85-.87).
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The Impermanence Awareness and Acceptance Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The 13-item Impermanence Awareness and Acceptance Scale (IMAAS) measures changes in an individual's state levels of impermanence awareness and impermanence acceptance on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Interconnectedness Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The 12-item Interconnectedness Scale will be used to measure participants' awareness on their interdependent relationship with all matters in the world on a 6-point scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 6 (totally agree). The scale measures interconnectedness in three dimensions: emotional response to interconnectedness, appreciation of interconnectedness on self-development, and interconnectedness in social relations.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Mindfulness-Discernment Scale (MDS)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The 20-item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF) and 10-item Mindfulness subscale in the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale will be used to measure levels of mindfulness. FFMQ-SF measures five dimensions of mindfulness including observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity (Baer et al., 2008) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Discernment will be assessed using the 14-item Discernment subscale in the Mindfulness-Discernment Scale. Items are rated on a scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 6 (Always).
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Nonattachment Scale(NAS)-Short Form
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The 8-item Nonattachment Scale Short Form will be used to assess participants' flexibility and balanced approach towards life experiences on a 6-point scale. Participants rated the items from 1 (disagree strongly) to 6 (agree strongly). Three items were reversed-coded and higher scores indicate higher level of nonattachment. This abridged version was developed and validated using item response theory in Hong Kong Chinese sample.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale (SCBCS) is a 5-item inventory that measures compassion for others using a 7-point Likert-like scale (1 = not at all true of me to 7= very true of me), which yields a possible range of 5 to 35 points, with higher scores mean a higher level of compassion.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale-Short is a 7-item self-report measure of subjective mental well-being on a 5-point Likert scale (1=none of the time, 5=all of the time), giving a minimum score of 14 and maximum score of 70. A higher WEMWBS score therefore indicates a higher level of mental well-being. The Chinese translation has demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in both community and clinical samples.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 6th week, follow up assessment at 10th week
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
A 20-item internalizing and externalizing problems subscales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be used to access their child's adjustment difficulties on a 3-point scale ranging from 1 (not true) to 3 (certainly true). The internalizing problems subscale capture emotional symptoms and peer relationship problems, whereas the externalizing problems subscale capture conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (Preschool Parents version) (SSIS - SEL)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
The SSIS SEL consists of 20 items which assess children's skills in each of the five social-emotional learning competencies: Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, Relationship Skills, Responsible Decision Making.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Child Prosocial Behavior Questionnaire (CPBQ)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
CPBQ consists of 10 items, Parents are asked to rate their child on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1(never) to 5(always) on prosocial behaviors. CPBQ consists 3 subscales, 1.Sharing, examples include:"Willingly shares toys with a parent, even without being asked". 2. Comforting, examples include: "Hugs others when they are upset". 3.Helping:"Picks up something that I have accidentally dropped and hands it to me"
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Children's Behavioral Questionnaire(CBQ) age 3-7-Short Form
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
In the CBQ, parents are asked to rate their child on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (extremely untrue of your child) to 7 (extremely true of your child). Parents are also provided with a Not Applicable response option when the child has not been observed in the situation described. The standard form consists 15 subscales, in this study, 3 subscales (18 items in total) from short form are used, namely Attentional Control, Impulsivity, and Inhibitory Control. A higher score on each subscale reflects a greater level of attentional control, Impulsivity, and Inhibitory Control, respectively.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Delay of Shared Gratification Task
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
The 5-minute Delay of Shared Gratification Task measures children's sharing behavior involving the small stickers. Children will be asked to share 1-2 stickers with other people over four instances, such as sharing with cost, sharing without cost, and delay of sharing.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Dictator game experiment
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Children are given 10 stickers and told these 10 belong to them. Then they were told that the other child would come in that day but would not get stickers. Children then chose how many of their stickers to share with an anonymous other child (gender matched). To give children privacy, the experimenter then closed his or her eyes while children put the stickers they wanted to keep in their envelope and put the stickers they wanted to give away in the envelope for the other child. Experimenter count the number of stickers that's given to the "other child".
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Puppet Task
Time Frame: Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week
Children will play 3 games alongside a puppet. In each game the puppet/adult realized that they did not have sufficient pieces to finish the task and became distressed that they were unable to receive a sticker. There were three distress prompts, which increased in the emotional intensity of suffering shown, This allowed three opportunities for the child to help. Helping was coded per task on a scale of 0(didn't help)-4(helped with no prompting). The total helping score could get is 0-12. if the child did not help, whether they console or disengage with the puppet is also coded.
Pre-intervention assessment, Post-intervention assessment at 12th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Winnie WS MAK, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca YM Cheung, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wellbeing

Clinical Trials on Social, Emotional, and Ethical Development (SEED) curriculum

Subscribe