Effect of Untact Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Using a Smart Board for Late Subacute and Chronic Patients With Brain Disorder

April 23, 2026 updated by: Won Hyuk Chang, Samsung Medical Center

A Multicenter Confirmation Clinical Trial of Untact Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Using Smart Board for Late Subacute and Chronic Patients With Brain Disorder - a Randomized Single-blinded Controlled Trial

The aim is to clinically validate the clinical efficacy, usability, and safety of home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the Neofect Smart Board by comparing the effects between a group using the home-based Neofect Smart Board and a group performing conventional home-based occupational therapy in patients with upper limb dysfunction in the late subacute and chronic stages of neurological diseases.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological diseases aged 19 to 85 years old
  • Patients with hemiparesis lasting for more than 3 months due to neurological diseases (stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor) and impaired upper limb function
  • Patients with shoulder flexor and adductor muscle strength of MRC grade 2 or higher
  • Patients with shoulder extensor and abductor spasticity of MAS grade 1+ or lower
  • Participants with sufficient cognitive function to understand the instructions from the researcher and the smart board, and to perform the tasks (K-MMSE ≥21)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pre-existing significant neurogenic disorders
  • major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or dementia
  • History of diseases that caused pain or muscle atrophy in the affected upper limb before the onset of the neurological disease, which interfered with rehabilitation
  • Severe spasticity of the affected upper limb (Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥3)
  • skin disorders or open wounds on the affected upper limb
  • Amputation, fractures, or soft tissue-related diseases or injuries on the affected upper limb
  • severe pain that interferes with rehabilitation of the affected upper limb (Numeric Rating Scale > 6)
  • Inability to maintain a seated posture for more than 10 minutes, which is required for using the smart board
  • Significant visual impairment to the extent that the screen cannot be recognized when using the smart board

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home-based Neofect Smart Board
home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the Neofect Smart board
a total of 20 sessions of home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the Neofect Smart board, with 30 minutes per session, 1 session per day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeeks.
Active Comparator: home-based occupational therapy
home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the workbook provided by the research team
a total of 20 sessions of home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the workbook provided by the research team , with 30 minutes per session, 1 session per day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of uper limb score in Fugl-Meyer assessment
Time Frame: Within 14 days before the intervention, within 2 days after intervention
(upper limb motor score in Fugl-Meyer assessment at post-intervention) - (upper limb motor score in Fugl-Meyer assessment at baseline) Higher scores mean a better outcome
Within 14 days before the intervention, within 2 days after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-09-105

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Home Based Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on Home-based Neofect Smart board

Subscribe