Effects of Combined Training Protocol in Volleyball Players (SSGs+PL+JR)

March 14, 2025 updated by: Neslihan AKÇAY, Karabuk University

Effects of a 12-Week Combined Training Protocols on Aerobic Fitness, Technical Skills, and Psychophysiological Responses in Young Recreational Volleyball Players

The 12-week training will take place during the preparation period. At the beginning and end of the 12-week period, vertical jump test, 60 seconds countermovement jump (CMJ) test, change of direction (T-Agility) test, sprint test, YO-YO (level-1) test will be applied in terms of performance test. In terms of skill testing, service test and spiking test protocols will be applied. Players will perform plyometric (PL) or jump rope (JR) training with the same amount of total training time in each training session. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be obtained using (CR6-20). All players will also complete the short form of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There will be 12 weeks of training during the preparation period. Each daily training will start with a 10-minute standard warm-up consisting of running, dynamic stretching and sprinting with volleyball-specific technical movements integrated. After warm-up and Small Sided Games (2v2, 3v3, 4v4, 5v5), players will perform plyometric (PL) or jump rope (JR) training with the same amount of total training time in each training session. At the start of the 12-week period, the vertical jump and 60 second countermovement jump (CMJ) using a portable force plate (Smart Jump; Fusion Sport, Queensland, Australia), T-Agility change of direction and Sprint tests with timing gates (Smart Speed; Fusion Equipment, Brisbane, Australia) and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 will be used for VO2max levels. Serve and Spiking Technical Skill Tests will be applied together with these. To minimise the negative effects of fatigue on psychological, physiological and performance responses, each training intervention will be performed at least 2 days apart. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be obtained using the category ratio scale (CR6-20) to calculate the internal training load (ITL) immediately after the completion of each session. The scale will be introduced at baseline to familiarise players. All players will also complete the short form of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES). The scale consists of 8 items scored on a 1-7 Likert scale and has been validated as an indicator of Turkish youth's level of enjoyment of activity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karabük, Turkey, 78200
        • Karabuk University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being healthy
  • Male volleyball athletes
  • Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being under 18 years old
  • Having a chronic disease
  • Contraindications for exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pliometric Training
Players will receive a Plyometric training program at the beginning of the Volleyball training session for a period of 15 minutes, two days a week.
The full intervention program will cover 12 weeks in the season. Prior to training, players will be instructed to warm-up for ten minutes with general running exercises and dynamic stretching. The plyometric training intervention will consist of 5 exercises performed in the following order: Leap forward and backward on the line, leap sideways on the line, double leg knee to chest, split squat jump, and squat jump (Bavli, 2012). A volleyball coach will monitor the whole training.
Experimental: Jump Rope training
Players will receive a jump rope training program at the beginning of the volleyball training session for 15 minutes, two days a week.
The entire intervention program will last for 12 weeks during the season. Before training, players will be instructed to warm up with general running exercises and dynamic stretching for ten minutes. The jump rope intervention will consist of 5 exercises performed in the following order: basic jump step, double leg double jump, double leg jump left and right, double leg jump forward and backward, and scissor steps (Trecroci et al., 2015). Each exercise will be performed by all participants using a jump rope with the same characteristics in terms of weight (e.g. 230g), length (e.g. shoulder size) and material (e.g. PVC, Polyvinyl Chloride). A metronome speed of 120 beats per minute will be used to ensure equal exercise intensity in both exercise programs Furthermore, a volleyball coach will monitor the entire workout.
Experimental: Small Sided Games
More complex, skill-based conditioning exercises for volleyball are small-sided games (2v2, 3v3) and competition drills (6v6).
More complex, skill-based conditioning exercises for volleyball are small-sided games (2v2, 3v3) and competition drills (6v6). Although the duration of each rally in these drills is not controlled by the coach, the total duration of the drill will be recorded to aid in-session and inter-session planning. Total repetitions will be easily measured by adding up the total points played in the rally and then multiplying by the number of rallies per point. The coach will create an emotionally intense environment by applying a scoring system (e.g. team winning 2 out of 3 rallies gets 1 big point, 5 seconds rest) and encouraging the players (Trajkovic et al., 2012).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vertical Jump
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
Change in vertical jump (cm) is expected from baseline assessment to 12-week follow-up assessment
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
60s Countermovement Jump
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Change in countermovement jump (watts/kg) is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment..
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Change of Direction
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
Changes in change of direction times (sec) are expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment]
Sprint
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Change in Sprint (km/h) is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
A change in VO2max values from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment is expected.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Service
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
A change in service test values from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment is expected.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Spiking
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
A change in spiking test values is expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment.
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE)
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Changes in Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) are expected from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment. The scale has a range of 6-20 (CR20). Athletes will indicate whether they do not find exercise difficult (6) or find it difficult (20).
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
PAGES
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment
Changes are expected in the Enjoyment of physical activity scale (PACES) from the baseline assessment to the 12-week follow-up assessment. The scale consists of 8 questions with a score range of 1-7. Athletes will indicate whether they do not enjoy exercise (1) or enjoy it (7).
From baseline assessment to 12 week follow-up assessment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometric Measurements 1
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants' height (cm) will assess by using a stadiometer (Holtain Stadiometer, England).
Baseline
Anthropometric Measurements 2
Time Frame: Baseline
Body weight (kg) will asses by Inbody 270 (Biospace, California, USA)
Baseline
Anthropometric Measurements 3
Time Frame: Baseline
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) will asses by Inbody 270 (Biospace, California, USA).
Baseline
Anthropometric Measurements 4
Time Frame: Baseline
Body fat percentage (%) will asses by Inbody 270 (Biospace, California, USA).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Neslihan Akçay, Doctorate, Karabuk University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UKarabuk-4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe