Improving Cognitive Recovery in Multiple Sclerosis (CIRCuiTS-MS)

April 14, 2026 updated by: King's College London

CIRCuiTS MS: Improving Cognitive Recovery in Multiple Sclerosis

This study aims to find out whether an adapted version of an existing cognitive rehabilitation program, CIRCuiTS (https://www.circuitstherapyinfo.com), can be used to improve everyday thinking skills for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). People living with MS have worked with the study's researchers to adapt CIRCuiTS to meet their needs. They shared the thinking challenges they experience and suggested changes to the program's content and how it is delivered. This study will test whether this adapted version can be delivered practically to people with MS in a trial setting and explore its potential benefits. The findings will help plan a larger trial testing how effective CIRCuiTS is in helping people with MS.

Twenty-four people with MS will take part in this pilot trial. Each person will be randomly assigned to start the program either right away or after a 13-week wait. The therapy program involves up to 36 hours of therapist-led and independent sessions over 12 weeks in which the participant builds thinking skills through developing personal strategies for carrying out digital versions of tasks they find challenging. The practicality of delivering the program to people with MS will be judged based on whether problems arise in the trial, such as not being able to recruit enough people or participants not liking it. To explore its potential benefits, the study will check for improvements in progress toward personal goals, thinking abilities, emotional well-being, chronic tiredness, and daily living skills after the therapy.

If delivering CIRCuiTS to people with MS is found to be both practical and acceptable to participants, the findings of this trial will be used to design a larger-scale trial of its effectiveness. Ultimately, the goal of this project is to improve the quality of life of people living with cognitive difficulties related to MS.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Objectives

The primary goal of this study is to assess the practical aspects of the research to determine whether a larger, fully-scale trial will be viable and acceptable. A feasibility decision will be reached by judging whether a suite of "Go"/"No-Go" thresholds associated with the primary outcome measures have been passed. Additionally, acceptability will be explored through qualitative analysis of participant exit interviews.

The secondary goal is to explore the potential that a larger trial will show that the program helps people with MS in meaningful ways.

Specifically, the study will examine whether the cognitive remediation program:

  1. Helps participants meet their personal goals
  2. Improves participants' cognitive function (how they think and think about thinking)
  3. Improves participants' mood (specifically feelings of anxiety and depression, which are common in people with MS)
  4. Helps reduce the severe fatigue that many people with MS experience
  5. Affects participants' ability to carry out everyday activities, such as managing tasks at home, working, and engaging in social and leisure activities.

These factors will be evaluated through assessing change in the secondary outcome measures after therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • East of England
      • London, East of England, United Kingdom
        • King's College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), as verified by a healthcare provider.
  • Participants should be in a relatively stable phase of their condition, not experiencing a severe relapse or acute health crisis at the time of the study.
  • Participants must have sufficient cognitive abilities to engage in therapy sessions, meaning they can follow instructions and perform the cognitive tasks required during the remediation program.
  • Participants must be able to effectively communicate in English, both verbally and in writing, to interact with therapists and complete assessments.
  • Participants must be adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Participants should have personal experience with cognitive challenges related to MS, such as problems with memory, attention, or problem-solving.
  • Participants must be willing and able to commit to attending all therapy sessions over the 12-week period, as well as attending assessments and completing any required homework or independent sessions.
  • Participants must provide informed consent, demonstrating that they understand the purpose of the therapy trial and are willing to engage in the course of cognitive remediation.
  • Participants must have access to a computer (laptop or desktop) for at least one hour per week during the treatment period (12 weeks).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are currently receiving cognitive remediation or a similar intervention.
  • Individuals with high levels of depression, indicated by a score greater than 9 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).
  • Individuals with active suicidal ideation, indicated by a score greater than 0 on question 9 of the PHQ-9.
  • Individuals with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder.
  • Physical disabilities that severely limit the individual's ability to attend therapy sessions or engage with the cognitive tasks (whether in-person or online) may lead to exclusion if suitable adaptations cannot be made.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate Treatment Group
Participants will start the cognitive remediation program immediately after recruitment. Outcome measures will be taken before treatment (week 1), immediately after treatment (week 14), and at 14 weeks after end of treatment (week 27).
The intervention is a blended treatment combining therapist support with carrying out tasks in CIRCuiTS™ digital cognitive remediation software. This software provides opportunities to practice a range of cognitive tasks and adaptively adjusts task difficulty. CIRCuiTS™ is much used in psychosis. Based on collaborative workshops with people with MS, participants for this trial will be asked to attend two 1-hour therapy sessions (in person or on MS Teams) and 1 hour of independent tasks each week for 12 weeks. Participants with reduced ability to operate a mouse quickly or dexterously will be offered a modified programme omitting tasks that require these abilities. The therapist will be an Assistant Psychologist trained in CIRCuiTS™ delivery and in appropriate adjustments to the needs of people with MS. They will follow a manualised template and will receive weekly supervision from an experienced clinical psychologist.
Experimental: Delayed Treatment Group
Participants will start the cognitive remediation program after being on a waitlist for 13 weeks. Outcome measures will be taken when added to the waitlist (week 1), before treatment (week 14), and immediately after treatment (week 27).
The intervention is a blended treatment combining therapist support with carrying out tasks in CIRCuiTS™ digital cognitive remediation software. This software provides opportunities to practice a range of cognitive tasks and adaptively adjusts task difficulty. CIRCuiTS™ is much used in psychosis. Based on collaborative workshops with people with MS, participants for this trial will be asked to attend two 1-hour therapy sessions (in person or on MS Teams) and 1 hour of independent tasks each week for 12 weeks. Participants with reduced ability to operate a mouse quickly or dexterously will be offered a modified programme omitting tasks that require these abilities. The therapist will be an Assistant Psychologist trained in CIRCuiTS™ delivery and in appropriate adjustments to the needs of people with MS. They will follow a manualised template and will receive weekly supervision from an experienced clinical psychologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of planned sample size recruited
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Ethnic enrolment diversity
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of sample belonging to the most common ethnicity
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Gender enrolment diversity
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Difference in the percentages of recruited participants identifying as male and female
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Completion rate
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of participants completing week 27 measures
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Midpoint retention
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of participants completing week 14 measures
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Dropout
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of enrolled participants who drop out
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Number of serious adverse events reported
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Manageability of adverse events
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Number of adverse events that cause the study to be halted
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Data completeness
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage outcome data complete
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Specific measure completeness
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage outcome data complete per measure
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Operational feasibility
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Number of significant operational issues that cannot be resolved
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Adherence: Therapy
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage participants attending ≥ 70% of therapy sessions
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Adherence: Independent sessions
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage participants attending ≥ 40% of therapy sessions
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Specific measure acceptability
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Percentage of participants who provide answers to demographic/medical background questions
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Program acceptability
Time Frame: Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months
Mean score on the general acceptability item of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability Questionnaire
Until the end of the study, estimated 15 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Goal Attainment Scale
Time Frame: From goal setting in week 1 to week 27
A personalised measure used to assess the extent to which patient-specific goals are achieved during therapy. Goals are collaboratively set between the therapist and patient, and the level of attainment is rated on a scale typically ranging from -2 (much less than expected outcome) to +2 (much more than expected outcome).
From goal setting in week 1 to week 27
Measure of Insight into Cognition
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A self-report questionnaire designed to assess an individual's awareness and understanding of their cognitive abilities and deficits. It is particularly useful in clinical settings where cognitive impairments are common, such as in MS. The MIC consists of a series of statements that participants rate based on their perception of their cognitive functions. Each item is rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The total score is the sum or average of the scores for the items. Higher scores indicate greater insight into one's cognitive abilities and deficits.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27

Designed for rapid assessment of neuropsychological abilities commonly affected in MS. Comprises:

The Symbol Digit Modalities Test, measuring processing speed and attention. The participant is asked to orally identify the digits associated with test symbols within a key. It is scored on the number of digits correctly identified within 90 seconds.

Tasks 1-3 of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, measuring immediate visual recall. The participant inspects an array of 6 abstract geometric figures during three 10-second learning trials and then draws the array from memory. Higher scores are awarded for more accurate figure reproduction and positioning.

Tasks 1-5 of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition, measuring verbal working memory. The rater reads a 16-item word list aloud five times to the participant, who is then required to recall as many as possible.

From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Digit Span
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
This subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Version 4 will be administered because it is a widely used measure of attention and working memory that does not show strong correlations with the California Verbal Learning Test. The participants is required to repeat sequences of digits, proceeding to longer sequences if correct, then repeat sequences backwards and in numerical order.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Controlled Oral Word Association Test
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A widely used neuropsychological assessment tool designed to measure verbal fluency, a component of executive function. It assesses the ability to generate words according to specific phonemic and semantic criteria within a limited time frame. The COWAT is commonly used in the diagnosis and evaluation of various neurological and psychiatric conditions. To measure phonemic fluency, participants are asked to produce as many words as possible that begin with a specific letter (usually F, A, and S) within 60 seconds for each letter. To measure semantic fluency, participants are asked to produce as many words as possible within a category (e.g., animals) within 60 seconds. The number of correct words generated in each category (phonemic and semantic) is counted. Repetitions, proper nouns, and variations of the same word are not included in the score. Errors will also be analysed, such as repetitions or rule violations, providing additional insights into cognitive function.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A widely used self-administered tool for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. It is based on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, each corresponding to one of the DSM-IV criteria for depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale based on the frequency of symptoms over the past two weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A brief, self-report screening tool commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms. The GAD-7 provides an efficient way to identify GAD symptoms and track their severity over time. The GAD-7 contains 7 questions that evaluate the frequency of core anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A self-report questionnaire designed to assess the impact of fatigue on a person's daily life. It is widely used in clinical and research settings to evaluate fatigue in various conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS). The FSS consists of 9 statements related to the severity and impact of fatigue. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The total score is the average of the scores for the 9 items, resulting in a score range from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity and impact.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time Frame: From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27
A self-report questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a person's mental health on their daily functioning. It is widely used in both clinical and research settings to gauge the extent to which psychological problems interfere with a person's ability to perform various life roles. The WSAS consists of 5 items, corresponding to five domains of daily functioning: work, home management, social leisure activities, private leisure activities, and family and relationships. Each item is rated on an 8-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all impaired) to 8 (severely impaired). The total score is the sum of the ratings for the five items, resulting in a score range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A total score of 20 or above suggests significant functional impairment.
From baseline assessment at week 1 to week 27

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Simblett, PhD, King's College London
  • Principal Investigator: Til Wykes, PhD, King's College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified text-based participant data and a data dictionary describing the data types collected will be provided.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available from the end of analysis (anticipated September 2026).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data and supporting information will be shared upon application to the listed study team.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on CIRCuiTS-MS

Subscribe