Spesolimab Post-marketing Surveillance in Korean Patients With Flares With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

March 26, 2026 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Regulatory Requirement Non-interventional Study to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of Spesolimab in Korean Patients With Flares With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

The primary and secondary objectives are to respectively monitor the safety and effectiveness of Spesolimab IV in Korean patients with flares with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in a routine medical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Busan, South Korea, 49241
        • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
      • Seoul, South Korea, 05505
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, South Korea, 06351
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Suwon, South Korea, 16499
        • Ajou University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in Korea

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients starting Spesolimab IV for the first time in accordance with the approved label in Korea (complete enumeration for the first 2 years after product launch)
  • Patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flare
  • Age >/=19 years at enrolment
  • Patients who have signed the data release consent form

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with Severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity to Spesolimab or to any of the excipients
  • Patients with clinically important active infections (e.g. active tuberculosis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with flares with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP)
Intravenous
Other Names:
  • Spesolimab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of unexpected adverse drug reactions
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of adverse events leading to temporary or permanent discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of adverse events leading to death
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician's Global Assessment for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPGA) pustulation sub-score of 0 indicating no visible pustules at Week 1
Time Frame: At Week 1
The GPPGA is a modified the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), a physician's assessment of psoriatic lesions, which was adapted to the evaluation of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patients. The investigator scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. Each component is graded separately, the average is calculated, and the final GPPA is determined from this composite score. A lower score indicates a lesser severity, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.
At Week 1
A GPPGA pustulation sub-score of 0 indicating no visible pustules at Week 4
Time Frame: At Week 4
The GPPGA is a modified the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), a physician's assessment of psoriatic lesions, which was adapted to the evaluation of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patients. The investigator scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. Each component is graded separately, the average is calculated, and the final GPPA is determined from this composite score. A lower score indicates a lesser severity, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.
At Week 4
A GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1
Time Frame: At Week 1
The GPPGA is a modified the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), a physician's assessment of psoriatic lesions, which was adapted to the evaluation of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patients. The investigator scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. Each component is graded separately, the average is calculated, and the final GPPA is determined from this composite score. A lower score indicates a lesser severity, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.
At Week 1
A GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 4
Time Frame: At Week 4
The GPPGA is a modified the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), a physician's assessment of psoriatic lesions, which was adapted to the evaluation of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patients. The investigator scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. Each component is graded separately, the average is calculated, and the final GPPA is determined from this composite score. A lower score indicates a lesser severity, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.
At Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1368-0122

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization).

For more details refer to: https://www.clinicalstudies.boehringer-ingelheim.com/msw/datasharing

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year after the approval has been granted by major Regulatory Authorities and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication, or after termination of the development program.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For study documents -upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'.For study data -1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by the sponsor and/or the independent review panel, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor'spublication plan); 2. and upon signing of a legal agreement.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe