Involvement of CDA and/or dCK Metabolizing Enzymes in the Response to Azacytidine Treatment of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies (CDA-AML-MDS)

Until now, the development of personalized medicine in oncology has relied on the use of somatic biomarkers to help therapists choose the right molecule(s) to administer, based on the genetic and molecular profile of each hematological disease. In this project, investigators propose to extend the strategy of therapeutic individualization to the field of dosage targeting. Today, azacytidine is a standard treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and/or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), usually as monotherapy. According to the treatment regimen, azacytidine is prescribed at a standard dose (DS=75mg/m²/d), administered subcutaneously every day for 7 days. The treatment cycle is repeated every 28 days.

No study has evaluated the relevance of "a priori" dose adjustment on an individual basis, according to each patient's pharmacogenetic data. In current practice, doses are adapted a posteriori, and reduced empirically, following the occurrence of observed toxicity (6 to 71% of patients) (Schuck A et al. 2017). This ex-post adjustment in the face of grade 3-4 toxicity is a loss of chance for the patient. Similarly, under-dosing patients for fear of toxicity is another loss of chance. Investigator's hypothesis is that the optimal dose of azacytidine depends not only on the characteristics of the patient's pathology (risk groups including cytogenetic and molecular biology data), but also on the patient's individual characteristics (genetic status of metabolic enzymes and transporters). A mathematical model of the PK/PD type could, on the basis of early observations of circulating levels, be capable of rapidly predicting the pharmacodynamic repercussions in each patient, thus enabling rapid individualization of dosages. In the future, such a tool could make it possible to propose dosage adjustments rapidly after treatment initiation, before toxicity occurs, by predicting azacytidine exposure levels, themselves correlated with the patient's clinical condition.

Study design: In this open-label, paucicentric, non-randomized study, patients with AML and/or MDS, all of whom are receiving azacytidine-based chemotherapy as part of their standard treatment regimen, will be included. Each patient will be monitored for toxicities (EORTC), treatment response and progression-free survival. In addition to the standard care described above, each patient will undergo a series of constitutional genetic investigations conducted by NGS on markers linked to azacytidine pharmacokinetics (CDA, dCK). Another series of blood samples will be taken to calculate individual azacytidine pharmacokinetic parameters using a Bayesian approach.

Expected results: This study should make it possible to correlate pharmacogenetics with patient plasma exposure, and ultimately improve the molecule's efficacy/toxicity balance by personalizing dosage regimens, which until now have been carried out on an empirical basis.

Prospects: If the data are validated, a pre-therapeutic ADC assay could predict azacytidine pharmacodynamics and enable individual dose and/or dosage adjustment, as is the case with 5-FU and DPD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patients with acute myeloid leukemia
  • Patient with myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Person who has given non-opposition
  • Patient who has signed an authorization to perform a constitutional genetic analysis (in the context of care)
  • Need for effective contraception in patients of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to obtain non-opposition
  • Adults under guardianship or safeguard of justice
  • Persons deprived of their liberty
  • Patient participating in another research project
  • Pregnancy in progress

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Blood sampling
Blood sampling through the differents cures of the patients

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

Cure 1: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 3: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Cure 6: after completion of subcutaneous administration of azacytidine A total of 5 samples in the induction phase.

Blood sampling :

Cure 1 before starting treatment Cure 3 before starting treatment Cure 6 after completion of treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma dosage of azacytidine
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
assessment of the relationship between azacytidine pharmacokinetic profile and cytidine deaminase status
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
phenotypic activity of CDA
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
searched by Sanger on a ThermoFischer 3500 Dx Genetic automaton using standard procedures, after identification of the most informative regions (exons, promoters). Haplotypic recombinations will be searched for using Haploview software.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Determination of ADC genotype
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
searched by Sanger on a ThermoFischer 3500 Dx Genetic automaton using standard procedures, after identification of the most informative regions (exons, promoters). Haplotypic recombinations will be searched for using Haploview software.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 14, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 14, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe