Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections

April 28, 2026 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections

The aim of the present clinical study, of prospective observational nature with biological study, is to conduct a clinical investigation on the the efficacy of a device coated with bacteriostatic silver coating, with the overall objective of understand whether the device is indeed able to reduce the number of peri-operative and post-operative infections, both early and late.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Among the various complications that can arise in orthopaedics following implant surgery, peri-prosthetic joint infections (Periprosthetic Joint Infection -PJI) represent one of the most feared complications and the main cause of revision surgeries (15% and 25% of hip and knee revision surgeries, respectively). In this complex context, prevention therefore plays a fundamental role and is a key objective considering the increasing number of patients considered to be at high risk such as the elderly, patients with recurrent infections (urinary, pulmonary, etc.), those suffering from diabetes mellitus or obese, the immunocompromised, or patients who have already undergone prosthetic surgery.

In order to reduce the risk of infection, it is therefore essential to adopt and implement preventive strategies that also involve the medical devices themselves, such as the development of passive surfaces capable of counteracting bacterial adhesion or active surfaces capable of exerting a direct action on micro-organisms. To achieve this second type of action, antibacterial agents, such as silver, known for its antimicrobial and bactericidal properties, are used.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40136
        • Recruiting
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matteo Romagnoli, MD
    • Italia
      • Argenta, Italia, Italy, 44011
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Mazzolani Vandini
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Revision patients with a history of previous infection awaiting access to 'second-stage' surgery or patients awaiting primary prosthetic surgery with recurrent urinary, pulmonary or other infections will be enrolled

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years;
  • Immunocompromised patients and/or diabetic patients.
  • Patients who have given consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged < 18 years;
  • Pregnant women;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
Revision patients with outcomes of previous infection awaiting access to "second-stage" surgery or patients awaiting primary prosthetic surgery with recurrent urinary, pulmonary or other district infections.
Patients who will be implanted with prosthesis with a silver coating to counteract infection relapse
Patients who will be implanted with prosthesis without silver coating

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of infections
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
To evaluate the performance of the silver-coated device in reducing the incidence of early (occurring within 30 days of surgery) and late (occurring more than 90 days after surgery) infectious event in patients considered to be at high risk because they are awaiting primary prosthetic surgery but i) subject to recurrent occurrence of urinary pulmonary or other tract infections, (ii) immunocompromised, (iii) with rheumatic diseases, (iv) diabetics, or spacer carriers awaiting second-stage surgery for previous prosthetic revision due to infection.
at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
Safety profile of silver
Time Frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
To assess the safety profile of device prosthesis system in terms of silver release. Blood sampling and urine sampling will be performed in enrolled patients prior to implantation of the device(baseline) and at selected follow-ups, to quantify and monitor for systemic Ag release from the prosthetic components. Samples will be appropriately processed and investigated by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis.
day 0 (at baseline), at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical scores 1
Time Frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
The clinical performance of the device through the performance of established clinical scores (Visual analogue scale).
day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
Clinical scores 2
Time Frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
The clinical performance of the device through the performance of established clinical scores (Short form 36)
day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
Osteointegration
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
The stability and osseointegration of the device through the evaluation of radiological images at different follow-ups (1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months).
at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
Complications
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up
The occurrence of possible early and late post-implantation complications
at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Silver ProTect

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Infection

Clinical Trials on silver coated device

Subscribe