Intelligence and Neurodevelopmental Outcome After Prenatal Exposure to Labour Epidural Analgesia: a Sibling Matched Clinical Ambidirectional Cohort Study

June 2, 2025 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
In Belgium, labour epidural analgesia (LEA) has been used for decades in the vast majority of vaginal deliveries (up to 83% of deliveries). Labour epidural analgesia is the most effective and safest way to allow pregnant women a nearly pain-free labour- and birth experience. Recent data showed that the use of LEA was associated with a reduced risk for severe maternal morbidity, neonatal resuscitation and with a reduced risk for low Apgar scores. However, prenatal exposure to labour epidural analgesia has been associated by several study groups with an increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the children, but these studies suffer from several important limitations which may have induced significant bias (e.g., not correcting for unmeasured confounders). Associations with other neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD)) and cognitive functioning have not been investigated yet. There is hence an urgent need for a study allowing definitive conclusions by overcoming the limitations of the previous studies. The investigators will perform the first sibling-matched clinical cohort study using a prospective investigator-assessment of multiple domains of cognitive functions. The investigators hypothesize that prenatal exposure to LEA will neither be associated with reduced intelligence nor with more neurodevelopmental disorders. Validating this hypothesis holds the potential to grant women the assurance to confidently receive the most efficacious method for labour analgesia, free from apprehension that it might have adverse implications for their children's neurodevelopment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Primary objective:

To compare the intelligence of children prenatally exposed to labour epidural analgesia with that of sibling matched unexposed children.

Secondary objective(s):

To compare parentally reported traits of ASD, ADHD, ODD and CD of children prenatally exposed to labour epidural analgesia with that of sibling matched unexposed children.

Endpoints:

  • Primary endpoint: Wechsler full scale intelligence quotient
  • Secondary endpoints: multiple indexes assessed by the Wechsler intelligence scale: verbal comprehension index, visual spatial index, working memory index, fluid reasoning index and processing speed index. Total scores and subscores of the parental questionnaires "social responsiveness scale" (SRS) and "vragenlijst voor gedragsproblemen bij kinderen 6-16" (VvGK6-16) are additional secondary endpoints.

Sample size:

At least 64 prenatally exposed children and 64 prenatally unexposed children

Summary of eligibility criteria:

Dutch speaking sibling pairs discordant for prenatal exposure to labour epidural analgesia will be included. Children born from 1st January 2014 until 1st November 2019 will be included. Children prenatally exposed to maternal surgery, foetal surgery/interventions, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, radiology and oncologic pathology will be excluded. Children with a diagnosis of severe disability of genetic origin (e.g., Fragil X, Down syndrome,…), history of head trauma, major congenital birth defects, children born at a gestational age < 37 weeks or > 42 weeks, or with a birth weight < 2.5 kg will be excluded. Children exposed to general anaesthesia after birth, twins/triplets/multiple births will be excluded. Elective and intrapartum caesarean sections will be excluded.

Maximum duration a research subject remains in the study:

Study will be conducted in 2024-2027. The end of the study for each individual participant is determined by the date at which the neuropsychological testing is planned. Neuropsychological testing usually takes no longer than 2 hours.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Sibling pairs discordant for prenatal exposure to labour epidural analgesia will be included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Exposed children: Children prenatally exposed to labour epidural analgesia
  • Unexposed children: Sibling of an exposed child, Prenatally not exposed to labour epidural analgesia
  • Exposed & unexposed children: Children born from 1st January 2014 until 1st November 2019, Parental informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose mothers underwent maternal surgery or foetal surgery/interventions during the same pregnancy.
  • Children exposed to general anaesthesia after birth
  • Children prenatally exposed to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, radiology, oncologic pathology
  • Children born at a gestational age < 37 weeks or > 42 weeks, or with a birth weight < 2.5 kg
  • Twins, triplets, multiple births
  • No Dutch-speaking children
  • Diagnosis of severe disability of genetic origin (e.g., Fragil X, Down syndrome,…), history of head trauma, major congenital birth defects
  • Elective caesarean section and intrapartum caesarean section (the number of caesarean sections will be reported and compared between both groups)
  • Foetus died before start of delivery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Exposed
Children prenatally exposed to labour epidural analgesia
Prenatal exposure to labour epidural analgesia during delivery
Unexposed
Prenatally not exposed to labour epidural analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wechsler full-scale intelligence quotient
Time Frame: At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Will be assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). Minimum value: 40, maximum value: 160. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
At te moment of neuropsychological testing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indices of the Wechsler intelligence scale
Time Frame: At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Verbal comprehension, working memory, visual spatial, fluid reasoning, processing speed. Minimum value: 40, maximum value: 160. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Clinically relevantly decreased intelligence quotient
Time Frame: At te moment of neuropsychological testing
The absolute risk reduction for a clinically relevantly decreased intelligence quotient, defined as an IQ<85, will be calculated.
At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Social responsiveness scale (SRS)
Time Frame: At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Parental reported social deficits in the autism spectrum. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 195. Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBDRS)
Time Frame: At te moment of neuropsychological testing
Parental reported traits of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD). Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 135. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At te moment of neuropsychological testing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Can be requested from authors.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Can be requested from authors.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Can be requested from authors.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Labour epidural analgesia

3
Subscribe