NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients

July 10, 2025 updated by: Süheyla Abitağaoğlu, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Effect of NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

With the aging population, the number of geriatric patients undergoing surgery is increasing daily. One of the anesthesiologists' main responsibilities is to prevent intraoperative pain and related complications. Opioids have been known for thousands of years as valuable tools for pain management and remain the cornerstone of perioperative analgesia today (1). Remifentanil is currently the most commonly used opioid during the intraoperative period due to its potent analgesic properties, short duration of action, and metabolism by plasma enzymes. While it may improve hemodynamic stability, remifentanil can also cause hypotension and bradycardia. Prolonged remifentanil use may lead to hyperalgesia, increasing the need for postoperative opioid analgesics and consequently leading to opioid-related side effects. In elderly patients, changes in body composition, drug sensitivity, and hepatic/renal metabolism require more cautious opioid administration.

Optimizing remifentanil infusion dosing during surgery may reduce total opioid consumption and thus decrease side effects such as wake-up time, postoperative pain, and nausea.

In conventional use, remifentanil is administered as a continuous infusion, and dosage adjustments are made based on heart rate and blood pressure changes to estimate pain levels. However, with goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring, more effective analgesia can be achieved. These applications are selected based on the clinician's experience and preferences. While some publications report that total remifentanil use decreases in patients with dose adjustments guided by pain monitoring, evidence is lacking regarding which method is superior in terms of patient outcomes in elderly populations.The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery.

After obtaining informed consent, a total of 80 geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery will be included. Once on the operating table, all patients will receive standard monitoring including peripheral oxygen saturation, non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and anesthesia depth. All patients will receive intravenous 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol under Sedline guidance, and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml. After anesthesia depth falls below 50, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered. Maintenance anesthesia will be with 1-2% sevoflurane in 40/60% oxygen/air mixture at 2 L flow. The method of remifentanil administration will be determined by the attending anesthesiologist.

Demographic data (age, height, weight, gender, comorbidities, ASA score) will be recorded. Hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO₂), remifentanil dosage, and NOL levels (for Group 2) will be recorded every 15 minutes during the surgery. At the end of surgery, the following will be documented:

Total remifentanil dosage Blood loss and transfusion volume Number of hypotensive events (MAP <55) Wake-up time Total surgical time NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) pain scores Nausea-vomiting scores

In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain and nausea-vomiting scores will be evaluated at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, along with duration of PACU stay. During ward follow-up, pain scores, nausea-vomiting scores, administered medications, and length of postoperative hospital stay will be recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours.

Nausea-vomiting will be assessed using a 4-point scale:

0: none

  1. nausea without vomiting
  2. nausea with vomiting
  3. vomiting more than twice

Pain will be assessed using the NRS scale.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 80 geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic opioid use
  • Severe congestive heart failıure
  • Severe arrhythmia
  • Uncontrolled hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Conservative
Our clinic's standard anesthesia induction and maintenance method will be applied to all patients. Patients will receive standard monitoring including peripheral oxygen saturation, non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and anesthesia depth. All patients will receive intravenous 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol under Sedline guidance, and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml. After anesthesia depth falls below 50, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered. Maintenance anesthesia will be with 1-2% sevoflurane in 40/60% oxygen/air mixture at 2 L flow.Remifentanil is administered as a continuous infusion in conservative approach;dosage adjustments are made based on heart rate and blood pressure changes to estimate pain levels.
Nociceptive level
Our clinic's standard anesthesia induction and maintenance method will be applied to all patients. Patients will receive standard monitoring including peripheral oxygen saturation, non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and anesthesia depth. All patients will receive intravenous 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol under Sedline guidance, and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml. After anesthesia depth falls below 50, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered. Maintenance anesthesia will be with 1-2% sevoflurane in 40/60% oxygen/air mixture at 2 L flow.Remifentanil is administered as a continuous infusion by using Nociceptive level guidance
remifentanil infusion dose adjustment according to the changes of nociceptive level

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total dose
Time Frame: operation duration
Total dose of remifentanil used in operation
operation duration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: postoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours

pain evaluation during postoperative 24 hour,

11 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will be used to measure pain level (0-10) 0: No pain, 10: Worst possible pain

postoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours
nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: postoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours

postoperative nausea and vomiting

Nausea-vomiting will be assessed using a 4-point scale:

0: none

  1. nausea without vomiting
  2. nausea with vomiting
  3. vomiting more than twice
postoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Süheyla Abitağaoğlu, University of Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • sabitagaoglu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on nociceptive level

Subscribe