Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Ain Shams University Hospitals

July 24, 2025 updated by: Ain Shams University
This study aims to evaluate the response to immunotherapy in HCC, assess the toxicity profile and measure overall survival within the study period. The primary end point is evaluation of progression free survival in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy. The secondary end point is to assess overall survival within the study period, duration of response and the response rate. The tertiary end point is to assess the toxicity profile.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Treatment starts after MDT discussion and approval for diagnosis, staging and treatment protocol.

  • This study includes patients with advanced HCC who will receive their first line of treatment. Cases will receive atezolizumab (1200 mg) + bevacizumab (15mg/kg) every 3 weeks or Tremilimumab (300 mg single dose IV infusion on first day only) + Durvalumab (1500 mg on the same day then every 4 weeks) according to eligibility criteria.
  • Cases will be evaluated every cycle clinically and laboratory.
  • Baseline investigations will include;

    1. Laboratory ;

      1. CBC
      2. liver enzymes (ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, GGT)
      3. liver function tests (serum albumin, serum bilirubin total and direct, INR)
      4. kidney function tests (serum creatinine, BUN, 24 hrs urinary protein)
      5. electrolytes Na, K, Ca)

      t) Others; HBAlc, Thyroid function tests (TSH, T3, T4), Alpha feto protein

    2. Radiological imagings;

      1. Triphasic CT and/or dynamic MRI abdomen
      2. PET scan or CT chest and bone scan
      3. ECG, ECHO, Upper GI endoscopy
  • Every 3 months patients will undergo laboratory and radiological investigations, assessed by 2 blinded radiologists.
  • The degree of adverse events was evaluated according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.(30) ,which rates toxicity on a scale from 1 to 5, with ascending order of severity. This will be managed according to toxicity grade whether treatment interruption, dose reduction or discontinuation.
  • Study treatment to be continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious inter-current illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent other than study treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Abbasya
      • Cairo, Abbasya, Egypt, 00202
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive sampling for patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria and after multidisciplinary team discussion at Clinical oncology department and HCC clinics, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18.
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma based on histological diagnosis or the typical findings on radiological imaging including enhanced dynamic computed tomography (CT) and/or dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • ECOG Performance status of 0 or 1
  • Patients with Child-Pugh class A
  • BCLC stage B with diffuse, infiltrative, or extensive bilobar involvement
  • BCLC stage B with tumor progression after failure of TACE
  • BCLC stage C
  • No prior systemic therapy for HCC
  • Additional eligibility criteria; Hb ≥ 9 g/dl, platelets ≥ 75x10%/1, ANC ≥ 1.5 x10% for Atezolizumab/bevacizumab and ANC ≥ 1x10%1 for Durvalumab/Tremilimumab, INR ≤ 2, albumin ≥ 2.8 g/dl, total bilirubin

    ≤ 3 mg/dl, AST and ALT ≤ 5 x ULN, creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min

  • Additional criteria for Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab; upper endoscopy showing no risky high grade esophageal varices (within 6 months of first dose) unless adequately managed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performance status ≥ 2
  • Patients with Child-Pugh class B or C
  • BCLC stage A or D
  • Active tuberculosis or active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • HCV or HBV infection except if; HBV DNA < 500 IU/ml or started anti- HBV treatment for a minimum of 14 days prior to first dose
  • Severe infection requiring hospitalization within 4 weeks prior to first dose
  • History of allogenic stem cell or solid organ transplant
  • Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive medication
  • Active and history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency
  • Receiving a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to first dose
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or evidence of active pneumonitis
  • Central nervous system metastases
  • Symptomatic hypercalcemia (ionized calcium > 1.5 mmol/1 (6 mg/dl), calcium > 12 mg/dl, or corrected serum calcium > ULN)
  • History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
  • Prior history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
  • Cardiac conditions, such as severe heart failure, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmias
  • Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy Special for atezolizumab + bevacizumab
  • Risky esophageal or gastric varies unless adequately managed
  • Severe portal hypertensive gastropathy which is associated with decline in hemoglobin, uniess controlled
  • Severe proteinuria ≥ 3.5 g/24 hrs or by dipstick 4+ proteinuria, according to CTCAE. Special for tremelimumab + durvalumab
  • Main portal vein tumor thrombosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time elapsed between treatment initiation and tumor progression or death from any cause. Progression (i.e., PD) was defined as presence of new measurable/non- measurable lesions, or ≥ 20% increase in tumour burden relative to nadir
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival within the study period,
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of loss of follow up or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from diagnosis to either last follow-up or /death
From date of randomization until the date of loss of follow up or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Response rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to study till 1 year or treatment
Response rate is defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response/immune complete response or partial response/ immune partial response to treatment
From enrollment to study till 1 year or treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the toxicity profile of immunotherapy
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year of treatment
The degree of adverse events was evaluated according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. ,which rates toxicity on a scale from 1 to 5, with ascending order of severity. This will be managed according to toxicity grade whether treatment interruption, dose reduction or discontinuation.
From enrollment to 1 year of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Immunotherapy

Subscribe