- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07090694
- Original Trial
PRF vs. Graftless Sinus Lift With Implant Placement
Transcrestal Sinus Elevation With or Without PRF for Atrophic Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Evaluation
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of sinus floor elevation using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) compared to a graftless approach in adult patients with atrophic posterior maxilla (residual bone height 5-7 mm) requiring dental implant rehabilitation. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does PRF enhance bone height gain more effectively than graftless sinus elevation? Does PRF improve implant stability and reduce marginal bone loss compared to the graftless approach? Researchers will compare the outcomes of PRF-grafted implants versus non-grafted implants to see if PRF improves radiographic and clinical results in single-stage implant placement.
Participants will:
Undergo internal sinus lift via crestal drilling approach
Be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Group I: sinus lift without graft material Group II: sinus lift with PRF as the sole grafting material Receive simultaneous dental implant placement during the sinus lift Be monitored through clinical exams and radiographic imaging over 6 months postoperatively
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of crestal sinus floor elevation in the atrophic posterior maxilla, comparing two approaches: one using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a sole grafting material and another performed without any grafting material. Both interventions are combined with single-stage dental implant placement. The rationale for this study is based on emerging evidence suggesting that graftless techniques, relying on blood clot stabilization and tenting of the sinus membrane, may be sufficient to induce predictable bone formation, especially when residual alveolar bone height is ≥5 mm.
The study involves adult patients presenting with edentulous posterior maxillary regions and limited vertical bone height due to sinus pneumatization and ridge resorption.
Participants are randomly allocated to either PRF or graftless groups. Both groups undergo transcrestal sinus elevation through sequential osteotomy, followed by immediate implant placement under a standardized surgical and prosthetic protocol.
Primary outcomes include radiographic bone gain and implant stability quotient (ISQ), while secondary outcomes include marginal bone loss and peri-implant clinical parameters. Radiographic evaluation is conducted using CBCT imaging at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. This study aims to provide evidence on whether PRF offers added clinical benefit over natural healing and clot formation in sinus lift procedures performed via the less invasive crestal approach.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11512
- College of Dentistry, Dar AlUloom University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 25 to 65 years
- Patients with one or more missing posterior maxillary teeth
- Residual alveolar bone height between 5 mm and 7 mm, confirmed by CBCT
- Good oral hygiene and motivation for implant therapy
- Adequate inter-arch space for prosthetic rehabilitation
- Absence of maxillary sinus pathology on radiographic assessment
- Patients willing to undergo single-stage implant placement with sinus lift
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic diseases or medical conditions affecting bone metabolism or wound healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, immunocompromised status)
- History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region
- Use of medications influencing bone turnover (e.g., bisphosphonates, corticosteroids)
- Active periodontal disease or poor oral hygiene
- Smoking or tobacco use
- Parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Known bleeding disorders or abnormal coagulation profiles
- Presence of maxillary sinus infection or pathology
- Inability to attend follow-up visits or comply with study protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Graftless Sinus Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement
Participants in this arm undergo crestal sinus floor elevation without the use of any grafting material.
The procedure involves a transcrestal (internal) sinus lift through sequential osteotomy followed by immediate placement of dental implants.
The elevated sinus membrane is maintained by the implant fixture alone, allowing for natural blood clot formation and spontaneous bone regeneration.
|
This intervention involves a minimally invasive internal (crestal) sinus lift performed without the use of any grafting material.
The sinus membrane is elevated using sequential osteotomy drills, and a dental implant is immediately placed into the prepared site.
The implant fixture acts as a tent pole, maintaining the lifted membrane and allowing for spontaneous bone regeneration through blood clot formation alone.
This graftless method eliminates the need for additional biomaterials and is intended for patients with residual alveolar bone height of 5-7 mm
|
|
Active Comparator: PRF-Grafted Sinus Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement
Participants in this arm undergo crestal sinus floor elevation using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as the sole grafting material.
PRF is prepared from the patient's own blood via centrifugation and inserted into the osteotomy site.
A dental implant is then placed immediately, supporting the sinus membrane and serving as a tent for guided bone regeneration.
This technique utilizes PRF's growth factors to promote healing and enhance new bone formation beneath the elevated sinus membrane.
|
This intervention utilizes autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as the sole grafting material during transcrestal sinus floor elevation.
PRF is prepared from the patient's own venous blood using centrifugation and inserted into the osteotomy site after sinus membrane elevation.
A dental implant is placed simultaneously to support the sinus membrane and stabilize the graft.
The biologically active PRF matrix provides a scaffold rich in growth factors (e.g., TGF-β, PDGF, VEGF), promoting accelerated healing and enhanced bone formation beneath the elevated sinus floor.
This technique is performed in a single-stage procedure, eliminating the need for synthetic or allogeneic grafts.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic Bone Height Gain
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months postoperatively
|
Vertical bone gain measured using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) from the alveolar crest to the elevated sinus floor.
The measurement is taken at baseline (preoperatively) and compared with measurements at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the success of sinus augmentation.
|
Baseline and 6 months postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)
Time Frame: Immediate postoperative (Day 0) and 6 months postoperatively
|
Measurement of primary and secondary implant stability using an Osstell device.
ISQ values are recorded at the time of implant placement and at 6 months postoperatively to assess osseointegration and mechanical stability.
|
Immediate postoperative (Day 0) and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Marginal Bone Loss
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months postoperatively
|
Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone loss measured at the mesial and distal aspects of the implant using CBCT or standardized periapical radiographs.
The difference in marginal bone height from baseline to 6 months will be calculated to assess peri-implant bone preservation.
|
Baseline and 6 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: SREIC College of Dentistry, Dar AlUloom University, Scientific Committee, Dar AlUloom University, SA
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 038- 003- 2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Demographic data (age, sex)
Baseline clinical measurements (residual bone height, CBCT parameters)
Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values
Radiographic bone gain and marginal bone loss measurements
Adverse events or complications (if any)
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Atrophy
-
Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterRecruitingVaginal Atrophy | Vulvar AtrophyIsrael
-
BionovoUnknownVaginal Atrophy | Vulvar AtrophyUnited States
-
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LimitedTerminated
-
United States Army Research Institute of Environmental...CompletedMuscular Disorders, Atrophic | Muscle Atrophy | Disuse Atrophy | Atrophy, Disuse | Disuse Atrophy Muscle of ThighUnited States
-
Robert WestermannWithdrawnMuscle Atrophy | ACL Tear | Quadriceps Muscle Atrophy | Muscle Atrophy, ProximalUnited States
-
University of JazanCompletedQuadriceps Muscle AtrophySaudi Arabia
-
DLR German Aerospace CenterCompletedMuscle; Atrophy, GeneralGermany
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreInnovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan from the Academic Health...Active, not recruiting
-
McMaster UniversityTerminatedSarcopenia | Muscle Atrophy | Muscle Disuse AtrophyCanada
-
Petra LarmoTurun Gynekologikeskus Oy; Tekes - The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology...CompletedVaginal Atrophy | Vaginal Dryness | Vulvar Atrophy | Vulvar DrynessFinland
Clinical Trials on Graftless Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation with Immediate Implant Placement
-
Sana'a UniversityRecruitingAlveolar Bone Atrophy | Edentulous Posterior Maxilla | Maxillary Sinus PneumatizationYemen
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyUniversity of TristeCompletedAtrophy of Edentulous Maxillary Alveolar RidgeItaly
-
Studio Odontoiatrico Associato Dr. P. Cicchese...CompletedEdentulous Alveolar Ridge Atrophy | Edentulous; Alveolar Process, AtrophyItaly
-
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingMaxillary Sinus Floor Elevation
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyTeresa Lombardi DDS private practice; Fabio Bernardello MD, DDS private practice and other collaboratorsCompletedEdentulous Alveolar RidgeItaly
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMarginal Bone Loss | Primary Stability of ImplantsEgypt
-
Semmelweis UniversityCompletedAlveolar Bone Loss | Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy | Sinus PneumatizationHungary
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyCompleted
-
ARDEC AcademyUniversity of Bologna; ITI International Team for Implantology, SwitzerlandCompleted