Expanding Access to Safe Water in Nigeria

November 17, 2025 updated by: Elisa Maria Maffioli, University of Michigan
Access to safe water remains a pressing public health challenge in Nigeria, where 67% of the population lacks safely managed drinking water and waterborne diseases cause an estimated 70,000 child deaths annually. Building on evidence that point-of-use chlorination is highly cost-effective in reducing diarrheal disease, this study evaluates a scalable, community-based chlorine distribution model through a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Kano State. Thirty communities across four Local Government Areas will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (i) 20 treatment communities receiving community demonstrations and local chlorine redemption points, (ii) 10 control communities where no intervention will be conducted. After 3 months, 5 control communities will receive an individual-level sensitization and a voucher program and 5 will remain pure control communities. The RCT aims to estimate the causal impact of the community-based intervention on household chlorination rates, water quality (E. coli contamination), and knowledge of safe water practices over six months. By rigorously testing a community-led water treatment model, this study contributes new evidence on sustainable and cost-effective approaches to expand safe water access in low-resource settings. The results will inform national and regional strategies for scaling point-of-use chlorination across sub-Saharan Africa.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant mothers and women with children under 5 children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men, women with no children under 5 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
Community Demonstrations and Redemption Points
Facilitators will collaborate with local leaders, WASH officials and health facility staff in conducting community demonstrations introducing the chlorine product (WaterGuard+) to communities in the treatment group. Local leaders in the community will organize the meeting, while facilitators in the country will demonstrate how to use the product, what the correct dosage is, and explain the importance of water treatment. They will also show how village water is contaminated with Ecoli. These meetings will be targeted at eligible women (pregnant women and women with children under the age of 5), however all members of the community will be invited to attend. At the meeting, each attendee will be given one bottle of WaterGuard+, which is enough to treat drinking water for a household of 5 members for about a month, and 1,000 naira. Water Guard + is a 180g bottle of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) in granulated / powder form, produced and distributed by the Society for Family Health.
Study staff will set up at least one chlorine redemption point for each community. The location of the redemption point will be determined in consultation with the local community during Community Demonstrations. The redemption points could be health facilities, local shops/dispensaries/kiosks, local pharmacies, house of the village leader, CHW, or health staff or other suitable sites. Households will be able to visit the location and redeem a month's supply of a chlorine product. Distributors will use a redemption log to keep track of when participants redeem the chlorine product.
No Intervention: Control
Neither community distributions will be conducted nor redemption points will be set-up during the study period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treat drinking water with chlorine (tested in water sample)
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of water samples with detectable chlorine in stored drinking water
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treat drinking water with chlorine (self-reported)
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of women who reported using chlorine in the previous two days
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Presence of E.coli
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of water samples with detectable E.coli
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Level of E.coli
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Level of E-coli (in log10 MPN/100ml) in water samples
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Unsafe risk of Coliform
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of water samples with unsafe coliform ( >100 colony forming units per 100mL)
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Heard about chlorine
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of women who ever heard about chlorine
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Ever used chlorine
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of women who ever used chlorine
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Last used chlorine
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of women who used chlorine yesterday or the day before
Measured up to 6 months of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elisa Maria Maffioli, PhD, University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Pascaline Dupas, Princeton University
  • Principal Investigator: Ana Radu, Princeton University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00277959

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Community Demonstrations

Subscribe