Stress-buffering and Sleep Disturbance-resilient Effects of a Dual Bifidobacterium Longum Combination Under Short-term Travel

March 30, 2026 updated by: Min-Tze LIONG

Stress-buffering and Sleep Disturbance-resilient Effects of a Dual Bifidobacterium Longum Combination Under Short-term Travel: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

This study aims to evaluate the effects of a dual Bifidobacterium longum probiotic formulation (dipro-O and dipro-X) on sleep quality, stress responses, and gut microbiota stability in healthy adults during short-term travel. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, the study investigates whether probiotic supplementation can enhance sleep resilience, buffer stress, and modulate microbiome and physiological responses under travel-related environmental changes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

With increasing global mobility, short-term travel has become a common aspect of modern life. However, rapid environmental transitions, including changes in time zones, diet, daily routines, and psychosocial stress, can disrupt physiological homeostasis. Among the most affected systems are sleep regulation, stress responses, and gut microbiota composition. Travel-related circadian misalignment and psychological stress are known to impair sleep quality, while dietary shifts and environmental exposure can alter gut microbial balance, potentially leading to gastrointestinal discomfort, immune dysregulation, and reduced overall well-being.

Emerging evidence highlights the central role of the gut-brain axis in mediating interactions between microbiota, stress, and sleep. Alterations in gut microbiota can influence neuroendocrine pathways, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, as well as neurotransmitter systems involved in sleep and mood regulation. Consequently, maintaining microbiota stability during periods of acute stress, such as travel, may be critical for preserving both physiological and psychological resilience.

Probiotics have gained increasing attention as a potential strategy to support health under such conditions. Defined as live microorganisms that confer health benefits when administered in adequate amounts, probiotics, particularly strains within the Bifidobacterium genus, have been shown to modulate gut microbiota composition, enhance barrier function, regulate immune responses, and influence neuroendocrine signaling. Certain Bifidobacterium longum strains have demonstrated beneficial effects on stress reduction, sleep quality, and emotional regulation, suggesting their potential role in mitigating travel-related disturbances.

In this study, a dual-strain formulation containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and dipro-X is employed, selected for their potential synergistic effects on microbiota modulation and stress resilience. These strains are hypothesized to support gut microbial stability, regulate stress-related biomarkers such as cortisol and salivary α-amylase, and improve sleep-related outcomes through modulation of neuroendocrine and microbial pathways.

To comprehensively evaluate these effects, the study integrates clinical, physiological, and multi-omics approaches. Sleep quality is assessed using both subjective (PSQI) and objective (wearable-derived) measures, while psychological status is evaluated using validated questionnaires (DASS-42, WHO-5). Biological samples, including saliva and feces, are collected to assess stress biomarkers, immune and inflammatory markers, and gut microbiota composition and function using metagenomic sequencing.

Importantly, the study adopts a longitudinal design encompassing pre-travel, travel, and post-travel phases, allowing for the assessment of dynamic changes and recovery patterns. This approach enables evaluation of not only the immediate effects of probiotic supplementation but also its potential to enhance resilience and facilitate recovery following environmental stress.

Overall, this study aims to provide mechanistic and clinical evidence supporting the use of targeted probiotic interventions as a strategy to improve sleep quality, buffer stress responses, and maintain microbiota homeostasis during short-term travel. By integrating microbiome, physiological, and psychological data, the findings are expected to contribute to the development of personalized, mechanism-based approaches for promoting health and resilience in the context of modern travel.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to participate in this study and able to provide written informed consent before any study procedures are initiated.
  • Able and willing to comply with all study procedures as required by the protocol, including continuous wearable device use, saliva and stool sample collection, and completion of questionnaire assessments.
  • Willing to accept randomization and group allocation as determined by the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known use of antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Use of probiotic supplements within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Planned use of any probiotic supplements during the study period.
  • Known history or current presence of major endocrine disorders, active inflammatory bowel disease or other severe gastrointestinal diseases, or severe sleep disorders requiring treatment adjustment.
  • Pregnant or intend to get pregnant, or lactating women.
  • Known allergy to any probiotic products.
  • Participation in any other clinical interventional study involving drugs, dietary supplements, probiotics, or prebiotics within the past three months.
  • Or those who, according to the researcher's judgment, may have inadequate adherence or are unable to complete the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Daily one sachet containing maltodextrin
Daily one sachet containing maltodextrin
Active Comparator: Probiotic
Daily one sachet containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-X, with a combined total dose of 5 × 10⁹colony-forming units (CFU) and maltodextrin as carrier
Daily one sachet containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-X, with a combined total dose of 5 × 10⁹colony-forming units (CFU) and maltodextrin as carrier

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep quality during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed via questionnaire
Time Frame: 10-days
Changes in sleep quality from generally healthy adults during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo, via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, scale 0-3 where higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
10-days
Sleep quality during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed using wearable device monitoring.
Time Frame: 10-days
Changes in sleep- and cardiac-related physiological parameters from generally healthy adults during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed using the Huawei Band 10 NFC edition.
10-days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General well being in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using questionnaire
Time Frame: 10-days
Differences in general well being using the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), having a scale of 0-5 where higher scores indicate better well being, upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo.
10-days
Psychological well being in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using questionnaire
Time Frame: 10-days
Differences in psychological well being using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 42 items (DASS-42), having a scale of 0-3 where higher scores indicate more severe depression, anxiety, or stress symptoms, upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo.
10-days
Microbiota profiles of fecal samples in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed via metagenomics sequencing.
Time Frame: 10-days
Differences in microbiota abundance in fecal sample of generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo.
10-days
Gastrointestinal immune biomarkers in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Time Frame: 10-days
Differences in concentrations of gastrointestinal immune biomarkers upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo such as calprotectin using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
10-days
Salivary stress biomarkers in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Time Frame: 10-days
Differences in concentrations of salivary stress biomarkers upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo such as cortisol using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
10-days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe