Effect of LSD on Renal Function in Cirrhosis Patients With Portal Hypertension Bleeding (2-Year Follow-Up) (LSD-RFPH)

May 14, 2026 updated by: Guo-Qing Jiang, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Long-Term (2-Year) Effects of Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection on Renal Function in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension Bleeding

Patients with liver cirrhosis often have impaired or at-risk kidney function due to the close link between liver and kidney (hepatorenal syndrome). Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection (LSD) is commonly used to treat Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Bleeding in these patients, but its impact on kidney function over 2 years is unclear. This study will follow patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy to measure changes in kidney function before and after surgery, identify risk factors for kidney damage and whether LSD can improve kidney function in the long term, and help improve care to protect kidney function in cirrhotic patients .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Liver cirrhosis is associated with systemic hemodynamic disturbances, reduced effective circulating volume, and renal hypoperfusion, creating a high risk of renal dysfunction and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)-a life-threatening condition reflecting the critical hepatorenal interaction. Patients with cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension Bleeding frequently have subclinical or overt renal impairment preoperatively. LSD is a standard intervention for Cirrhosis Patients With Portal Hypertension Bleeding, but perioperative stress, hemodynamic fluctuations, and surgical trauma may further compromise renal function, and LSD may improve kidney function in the long term. Current evidence lacks prospective, 2-year data on renal function changes after LS in this high-risk population, especially regarding the hepatorenal axis and long-term renal outcomes. This study aims to fill this gap to guide perioperative renal protection strategies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Prospective, single-center, observational cohort study with a total duration of 24 months (2 years). Patients with cirrhosis, Splenomegaly and hypersplenism, Portal Hypertension Bleeding scheduled for Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection will be enrolled and followed for 2 years to assess renal function dynamics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (clinical, laboratory, imaging)
  2. Splenomegaly and hypersplenism
  3. History of portal hypertension bleeding (esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding )
  4. Age 18-80 years, male or female
  5. Child-Pugh Class A or B liver function
  6. No history of primary renal disease or acute kidney injury (AKI)
  7. Signed written informed consent
  8. Ability to complete 24-month follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Child-Pugh Class C liver cirrhosis
  2. Primary renal diseases (glomerulonephritis, polycystic kidney disease, chronic pyelonephritis, etc.)
  3. Previous abdominal surgery precluding safe laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection
  4. Severe cardiac, pulmonary, cerebrovascular dysfunction; malignant tumors; primary hematological disorders
  5. Hepatic encephalopathy or refractory ascites within 1 month before surgery
  6. Pregnancy or lactation
  7. Poor compliance, inability to complete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24

Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). For females: If serum creatinine (Scr) ≤ 0.7 mg/dL: eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.7)^(-0.241) × (0.9938)^Age; If Scr > 0.7 mg/dL: eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.7)^(-1.200) × (0.9938)^Age.

For males: If Scr ≤ 0.9 mg/dL: eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.9)^(-0.302) × (0.9938)^Age; If Scr > 0.9 mg/dL: eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.9)^(-1.200) × (0.9938)^Age.

Note: Results are in mL/min/1.73 m². Age is in years.

at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR)
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR (mg/g) = Urine albumin concentration (mg/L) ÷ Urine creatinine concentration (g/L)]
at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Serum creatinine (Scr) level
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Change in serum creatinine (Scr) level
at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
BUN and UA level
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Changes in BUN and UA level
at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child-Pugh grade
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24

Changes in Child-Pugh grade The Child-Pugh score is calculated based on five parameters, each assigned 1, 2, or 3 points.

  1. Total bilirubin

    • Less than 2 mg/dL: 1 point
    • 2-3 mg/dL: 2 points
    • Greater than 3 mg/dL: 3 points
  2. Serum albumin

    • Greater than 3.5 g/dL: 1 point
    • 2.8-3.5 g/dL: 2 points
    • Less than 2.8 g/dL: 3 points
  3. Prothrombin time prolongation or INR

    • Prolongation less than 4 seconds (INR < 1.7): 1 point
    • Prolongation 4-6 seconds (INR 1.7-2.3): 2 points
    • Prolongation greater than 6 seconds (INR > 2.3): 3 points
  4. Ascites

    • None: 1 point
    • Mild or controlled with diuretics: 2 points
    • Moderate to severe or refractory: 3 points
  5. Hepatic encephalopathy

    • None: 1 point
    • Grade I-II: 2 points
    • Grade III-IV: 3 points

Total score and corresponding grade

  • 5-6 points: Child-Pugh class A
  • 7-9 points: Child-Pugh class B
  • 10-15 points: Child-Pugh class C
at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative day 1, day 3, day 7, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
postoperative complications (bleeding, infection, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites)
at preoperative baseline, postoperative day 1, day 3, day 7, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Intraoperative variables
Time Frame: During the procedure of operation
operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluid infusion
During the procedure of operation
Albumin and bilirubin level
Time Frame: at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24
Changes in albumin and bilirubin level
at preoperative baseline, postoperative month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Guo-Qing Jiang, MD, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Portal Hypertension

Subscribe