Evaluation of a Virtual Reality-based Version of the Multiple Errands Test in Alcohol Use Disorder (EVIMETAL)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Hôpital le Vinatier

Evaluation of a Virtual Reality-based Version of the Multiple Errands Test for the Assessment of Executive Functions in Alcohol Use Disorder

The goal of this study is to validate the virtual version of the Multiple Errands Test (V-MET) as a tool for assessing executive functions in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD).

More specifically, the project aims to:

  1. evaluate if the performance in the virtual version of the test is related to the performance in the original test in patients with AUD.
  2. establish whether the virtual version of the test is sensitive enough to detect patients with or without an executive function deficit.

All participants will perform the original version (in a real-life supermarket) and the virtual version of the test (in a virtual reality environment).

Performance in the two versions of the test will be compared. Participants will also complete a battery of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The project aims to validate the virtual version of the Multiple Errands Test (V-MET) as a tool for assessing executive function in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), in comparison to the original test (MET), by:

  1. establishing the ecological validity of the V-MET: a high correlation between performance on the MET and performance on the V-MET (total number of errors) in patients with TUAL and executive dysfunction.
  2. establishing the sensitivity of the V-MET (to executive dysfunction): significant difference between V-MET performance in patients with an AUD and executive dysfunction versus (a) patients without executive dysfunction and (b) "healthy" volunteers

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written consent
  • Normal or corrected vision and hearing
  • Membership or entitlement to a social security plan
  • spoken and written French
  • third party liability insurance

for patients only :

  • at least 6 criteria for AUD based on the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  • At the end of withdrawal: treatment with a diazepam equivalent of ≤ 20 mg/day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under tutorship/ judicial protection
  • Sensory or motor impairment (impeding the use of virtual reality and/or mobility)
  • Severe neurological disorder (such as dementia or Korsakoff's syndrome)
  • Photosensitive epilepsy (contraindication for the use of virtual reality)
  • Any other condition deemed incompatible with the study, at the investigator's discretion
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score < 10 (severe cognitive impairment)
  • Breastfeeding or pregnant women
  • Familiarity with the supermarket visited during the MET test

For controls only :

  • History of alcohol use disorder
  • score ≥ 8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
  • Score on the Frontal Assessment Battery < 16 (or < 15 if education is below secondary level)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AUD group with executive function deficit
Group of patients with alcohol use disorder and a deficit in executive functions as assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery
The test takes place in a real supermarket. Participants must complete a list of tasks (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) while adhering to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc).

The test takes place in a virtual supermarket, developed on the C2Neuro app by C2CARE®.

Participants must complete a similar list of tasks to the MET (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) and adhere to similar to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc) .

Active Comparator: AUD group without executive function deficit
Group of patients with alcohol use disorder but without a deficit in executive functions as assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery
The test takes place in a real supermarket. Participants must complete a list of tasks (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) while adhering to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc).

The test takes place in a virtual supermarket, developed on the C2Neuro app by C2CARE®.

Participants must complete a similar list of tasks to the MET (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) and adhere to similar to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc) .

Active Comparator: Control group
Group of healthy volunteers
The test takes place in a real supermarket. Participants must complete a list of tasks (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) while adhering to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc).

The test takes place in a virtual supermarket, developed on the C2Neuro app by C2CARE®.

Participants must complete a similar list of tasks to the MET (e.g., purchasing certain items, collecting some information) and adhere to similar to rules (e.g., not visiting the same place twice, etc) .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of errors on the test
Time Frame: Baseline

Total number of errors on the MET and the V-MET.

Errors include:

  • Inefficiencies (a more effective action could have been made)
  • Rule breaks: a specific rule is broken
  • Interpretation failure (the task is misunderstood or misinterpreted)
  • Task failure: not carried out or not completely completed
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inefficiencies on the test
Time Frame: Baseline
Inefficiencies on the MET/V-MET : a more effective action could have been made Can be infinite
Baseline
Rule breaks on the test
Time Frame: Baseline
Rule breaks on the MET / V-MET : a specific rule is broken
Baseline
Task failures on the test
Time Frame: Baseline
Task failures on the MET / V-MET : task not carried out or not completely completed
Baseline
Interpretation failures on the test
Time Frame: Baseline
Interpretation failures on the MET/V-MET : the task is misunderstood or misinterpreted
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe ICARD, MD, CH le Vinatier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study might be shared, including de-identified demographic data, baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and variables necessary to reproduce the analyses. All data will be fully anonymized to protect participant confidentiality. A data dictionary and relevant metadata might also be provided to facilitate interpretation and reuse.

The analytic code will be provided at the time of publication of the primary study results. De-identified IPD will be shared via an open science repository such as Open Science Framework and may also be made available upon request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data and supporting documents will be available beginning at the time of publication of the primary results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made openly available

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

Clinical Trials on Multiple Errand Test (MET)

Subscribe