Optimizing Smart Technology for Addiction Recovery (STAR)

June 22, 2026 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Optimizing Algorithmic Feedback About Lapse Risk for Trust, Engagement, and Clinical Outcomes for Alcohol Use Disorder

The goal of this study is to develop a machine-learning guided recovery messaging system. The main question it aims to answer is can messages be used to:

  • help people to improve their health
  • make changes in people's lives to address alcohol and substance use

Participants will:

  • complete surveys
  • use a recovery-support digital therapeutic system

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study seeks to optimize messaging components which can be implemented in a recovery support messaging system such as may accompany a digital therapeutic app, in order to determine optimal messaging to increase interaction with recovery support resources, and whether messaging has any effect on clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

416

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706
        • Recruiting
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • meet criteria for alcohol use disorder with at least moderate severity (>= 4 DSM-5 criteria)
  • in initial remission with most recent use of alcohol between 1 week and 3 months in the past
  • able to read English
  • have a smartphone and cellular plan that supports STAR use (Apple iOS or Android)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical or psychiatric co-morbidities that preclude use of a smartphone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STAR
Participants will use the STAR automated recover support system for 4 months
Automated recovery support messaging system for participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD), paired with a machine learning guided relapse risk prediction model.
Other Names:
  • Smart Technology for Addiction Recovery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant engagement with the STAR system
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Measured as days of engagement with the recovery system.
data collected at 2 and 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of heavy drinking days in the previous 28 days
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB. These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?" (Yes/No). If yes they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking and how many drinks they consumed that day (less than 1, 1-2, 3, 4, 5-6, 7-8, over 8). Four or more drinks are considered heavy drinking days for women and greater than 4 drinks are considered heavy drinking days for men.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Number of drinking days in the previous 28 days
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months. EMA lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB. These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?" (Yes/No). If yes, they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Flourishing Scale Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
10 items rated on 0-10 Likert scale where lower scores represent worse functioning and higher scores represent better functioning. Total possible range of scores is from 0-100.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
7 items rated on 0-3 Likert scale where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning. Total possible range of scores is from 0-21.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC) Score: Total Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
1-4 Likert scale. Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning. Scored as total score 4-56.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC) Score: Each Domain
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
1-4 Likert scale. Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning. Scored in 4 domains (social, physical, human, and cultural), each from 1-14.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PQH-9) Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
9 items rated on 1-4 Likert scale. Total possible range of scores from 0-27 where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning.
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Digital Working Alliance Inventory (D-WAI)
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Six items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Scored in 3 domains (Goals, Tasks, Bonds, each with 2 items) with possible scores from 2 to 14 where higher scores represent greater alliance with the STAR system in that domain.
data collected at 2 and 4 months
Message Usefulness
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Seven items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Total possible scores from 7 to 49 where higher scores represent greater valuation of STAR message usefulness.
data collected at 2 and 4 months
Trust of the System
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Ten items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Total possible scores from 10 to 70 where higher scores represent greater trust in the STAR system.
data collected at 2 and 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Curtin, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-0869
  • A487400 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1R01AA031762-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • Protocol Version 4/22/2026 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on STAR

3
Subscribe