Effectiveness of Live Motile Sperm Sorting Device on IVF Outcomes in Advanced Paternal Age (IVF)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Trinh The Son, Vietnam Military Medical University

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Live Motile Sperm Sorting Device on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Advanced Paternal Age Group

Male infertility contributes significantly to infertility, particularly in advanced paternal age men where sperm DNA fragmentation is increased. Conventional density gradient centrifugation may induce oxidative stress and sperm damage. LensHooke® CA0 is a centrifugation-free sperm sorting device designed to improve sperm quality and reduce DNA fragmentation. This prospective comparative study evaluates the effectiveness of CA0 versus conventional density gradient centrifugation on post-processing sperm quality, DNA fragmentation index, blastocyst formation, euploid embryo rate, and clinical pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles involving men aged 40 years or older

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Male infertility contributes to approximately 50% of all infertility cases. One of the essential steps in assisted reproductive technology (ART) is sperm preparation, which aims to select motile, morphologically normal spermatozoa with minimal DNA damage. However, conventional sperm preparation techniques involving centrifugation may increase oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation. The live motile sperm sorting device LensHooke® CA0 has been proposed as an alternative to traditional density gradient centrifugation (DGC), aiming to reduce sperm damage and potentially improve IVF outcomes.

LensHooke® CA0 offers several advantages: it avoids centrifugation and the mechanical stress associated with it; optimally reduces the DNA fragmentation index (DFI); minimizes the risk of premature acrosome reaction (AR); is suitable for both normozoospermic and non-normozoospermic semen samples; simplifies workflow (only three pipetting steps required: loading, medium addition, and recovery); and ensures a high degree of standardization, reducing inter-technician variability.

Moreover, paternal age is an important factor influencing sperm quality and fertility potential. Studies have demonstrated that men over 40 years of age exhibit higher sperm DNA fragmentation rates, increased morphological and motility abnormalities, and are associated with a higher incidence of embryonic chromosomal abnormalities and reduced live birth rates. Therefore, this population particularly requires optimized sperm selection methods to improve IVF/ICSI outcomes.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of this device through two primary objectives:

  1. To compare sperm quality post-processing and the DNA fragmentation index between the CA0 method and the conventional DGC method in advanced paternal age group.
  2. To compare the rates of blastocyst formation, euploid embryos, and clinical pregnancy between the two sperm preparation techniques in advanced paternal age group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

378

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male partners aged ≥ 40 years
  • Semen analysis: volume ≥ 1.4 mL, sperm concentration ≥ 6 million/mL, progressive motility (PR) ≥ 20% after 3-5 days of abstinence.
  • Female partners with ≥ 5 mature (MII) oocytes retrieved.
  • Couples undergoing ICSI with PGT-A and elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
  • Willingness to participate and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Azoospermia, surgical sperm retrieval, or use of cryopreserved sperm.
  • Female uterine or ovarian conditions severely affecting IVF outcomes.
  • Use of donor sperm or donor oocytes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study group (CA0)
Sperm preparation using LensHooke® CA0 live motile sperm sorting device.

Sperm will be processed using the CA0 device by loading 1.0 mL of semen into the lower chamber and adding 0.9 mL of pre-equilibrated sperm washing medium into the upper chamber.

The device is incubated at 37 °C for a minimum of 30 minutes, followed by aspirating 0.5 mL of recovered sperm suspension for ICSI.

Active Comparator: Control group (DGC)
Conventional sperm preparation using density gradient centrifugation.

Sperm will be prepared by layering 1 mL of 45% medium and 1 mL of 90% medium with 1 mL of semen sample.

This is followed by a first centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 15 minutes, a wash step using 2 mL G-IVF plus medium, and a second centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes to retain 0.5 mL of the sperm suspension.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Pregnancy Rate after single embryo transfer
Time Frame: 4 to 6 weeks after embryo transfer
Confirmed by the presence of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound.
4 to 6 weeks after embryo transfer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-processing sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI, %)
Time Frame: Immediately after sperm preparation on the day of oocyte retrieval
Evaluated using the LensHooke® R11 Plus assay
Immediately after sperm preparation on the day of oocyte retrieval
Blastocyst rate and good-quality blastocysts rate
Time Frame: Day 5 to Day 6 after ICSI
Evaluated according to Gardner's criteria and classified following Munné et al. (2019)
Day 5 to Day 6 after ICSI
Euploidy rate.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks after blastocyst biopsy
Assessed via preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Within 2 weeks after blastocyst biopsy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Male Infertility

Clinical Trials on LensHooke® CA0 sperm sorting device

Subscribe