Severe LH Suppressed Patients After Administration of a GnRH Antagonist (OPTOMALH)

September 2, 2013 updated by: shahar kol, Assuta Hospital Systems

To Define the Individual Need of Exogenous LH During Ovarian Stimulation for Severe LH Suppressed Patients After Administration of a GnRH Antagonist

The ideal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation is under constant debate, as we gain more pharmacological control over the patient hormonal milieu. Specifically, the debate focuses around the ideal LH levels. The concept of an "LH window" was suggested.

The need for a threshold level of LH is clearly demonstrated in hypogonado-tropic hypogonadism patients, but also in cycling patients receiving high doses of GnRH antagonist. The Ganirelix dose finding study demonstrated very low implantation rates in the high dose groups (1 mg, 2 mg).

The stimulation dynamics in these patients were remarkable for very low E2 and LH levels on the day of hCG. In fact, a functional state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is achieved, explaining the poor clinical results (1.5% implantation rate under 2 mg Ganirelix). The same protocol was repeated with added Luveris resulting in excellent pregnancy rates.

The recommended daily dose of GnRH antagonist is 0.25 mg which on the average provides a protection from premature LH surge, with moderate suppression of LH. Therefore, most patients do not need supplemented LH after the antagonist is initiated.

However, there is a subgroup of patients who hyper-respond to the antagonist (in 0.25 mg dose) with a sharp decrease in LH. This explains contradictory findings in the available studies. The basic assumption in the background of this proposal is that there is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonist. Obeying a bell-shape curve, most women have an average response, however, some hypo-respond might ovulate prematurely, and others hyper-respond. In the latter cases, pituitary response will behave as if exposed to a higher dose.

How to identify an exposure to a presumed higher dose?

Below is a figure from the original paper. A close look indicates that the immediate response to all Ganirelix doses are similar in terms of LH drop, however, the big difference lies in the pituitary recovery 24 hours post Ganirelix dose.

While small doses allow for a quick recovery to almost pre-treatment LH levels, high doses result in incomplete recovery. Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that the high response to 0.25 mg dose will lead to slow or incomplete recovery of LH levels 24 hours post the initial dose.

It is estimated that about 15% of patients are antagonist hyper-responders. Efforts to individualize patient protocol must target this group as candidates for supplemented LH. This estimate is similar to study findings: Huirne et al Human Reproduction 2005, 20: 359.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel
        • Women Health Center, Maccabi Health Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 39 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. The patient is eligible for IVF and will be treated according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and routine practice in participating centres.

    2. The patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.

    3. The patient has given written informed consent with the understanding that the consent may be withdrawn by her at any time without prejudice for her future medical care.

    4. Must be hyper-responder to antagonist according definition

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ovarian, uterine or mammary cancer.
  2. Tumours of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland.
  3. Uterine myoma requiring treatment.
  4. Ovarian enlargement or cyst of unknown aetiology.
  5. A clinically significant systemic disease.
  6. Abnormal gynaecological bleeding of undetermined origin.
  7. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to human gonadotrophin preparations.
  8. Entered previously into this study or simultaneous participation in another clinical study.
  9. Age > 39 yrs,
  10. BMI > 32 kg/m2,
  11. Patient with no cycles: PCOS or an anovulatory patient. -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: GnRH antagomnist hyper-responders
Those defined as hyper-responders will be given recombinant LH.
150 IU recombinant LH daily.
Other Names:
  • Luveris

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary endpoint will be the proportion of patients who, after receiving Cetrotide after 4 or 5 days of Gonal -F stimulation, are severely down-regulated.
Time Frame: 24 hours after first administration of Cetrotide.
If LH drops more than 50% from its baseline (as measured before Cetrotide) the patient is defined as "Cetrotide hyper-responder"
24 hours after first administration of Cetrotide.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010036

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility, Female Infertility, Male Infertility

Clinical Trials on Recombinant LH (Luveris)

Subscribe