Transcatheter vs. Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (DMR)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Aakriti Gupta, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Transcatheter vs. Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes, Patient Experiences, and Mechanistic Insights With Multimodality Imaging

The goal of this observational study is to compare the outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) versus surgical mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) over the long term. The study aims to:

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TEER versus surgery in patients with DMR over long term.
  2. Investigate the predictors of left ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcomes using advanced imaging techniques, such as cardiac MRI
  3. Assess patient-reported recovery and quality of life outcomes using validated tools.

The study focuses on improving care strategies for patients with DMR, particularly those at higher surgical risk, by identifying optimal treatment approaches and predictors of recovery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This is an ambispective, (prospective and retrospective) cohort study collecting clinical, procedural, and follow-up data to compare the outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) versus surgical mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) over the long term.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Recruiting
        • Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes adult patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) who underwent either surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 60 years who have DMR will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prior history of mitral intervention or surgery will be excluded.
  • Patient records flagged "break the glass" or "research opt out" will be excluded.
  • Persons with allergy to animal dander or animal-instigated asthma will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Surgical mitral repair
This cohort includes patients who underwent surgical mitral valve repair for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). The intervention involves standard surgical techniques to repair the mitral valve, aiming to restore its physiological function and reduce mitral regurgitation.
Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair
This cohort includes patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). The intervention involves a minimally invasive transcatheter procedure using a device to approximate the mitral valve leaflets, reducing regurgitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and valve re-intervention
Time Frame: From procedure to 3 years after procedure
Composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and valve re-intervention
From procedure to 3 years after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Residual Mitral Regurgitation Greater Than 2+ by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Percentage of participants with residual mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ assessed by transthoracic echocardiography after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Left ventricular ejection fraction, measured as percentage by transthoracic echocardiography, after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Mean transmitral valve gradient, measured in mm Hg by transthoracic echocardiography, after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after procedure
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score, measured on a 0 to 100 scale, will be used to assess patient-reported health status after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Higher scores indicate better health status.
At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Functional capacity will be assessed using the 6-minute walk test distance, measured in meters.
At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
The SF-36 Physical Component Summary score will be used to assess patient-reported physical health status. Scores are reported as scale scores, with higher scores indicating better physical health status.
At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
SF-36 Mental Component Summary Score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
The SF-36 Mental Component Summary score will be used to assess patient-reported mental health status. Higher scores indicate better mental health status.
At baseline and at 2 weeks, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Percentage of Participants With All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Percentage of Participants With Heart Failure Hospitalization
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Percentage of participants hospitalized for heart failure after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Mitral Valve Reintervention
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure
Percentage of participants requiring mitral valve reintervention after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
At 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With One or More Major Periprocedural or 30-Day Complications
Time Frame: From start of procedure to 30 days after procedure
Percentage of participants with one or more major periprocedural or 30-day complications after surgical mitral valve repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Major complications include coronary obstruction, cardiac tamponade, new left bundle branch block, major bleeding, stroke or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, new-onset atrial fibrillation, infection or sepsis, permanent pacemaker implantation, or conversion to open surgery.
From start of procedure to 30 days after procedure
Correlation Between Baseline CMR-Derived Extracellular Volume and 6-Month Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure
Correlation between baseline myocardial extracellular volume, measured as percentage extracellular volume by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and left ventricular ejection fraction, measured as percentage by transthoracic echocardiography at 6 months after procedure.
From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure
Difference in 6-Month Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by Baseline Late Gadolinium Enhancement Presence
Time Frame: From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure
Difference in 6-month left ventricular ejection fraction, measured as percentage by transthoracic echocardiography, between participants with and without baseline late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure
Correlation Between Baseline CMR-Derived Extracellular Volume and 6-Month Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume Index
Time Frame: From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure
Correlation between baseline myocardial extracellular volume, measured as percentage extracellular volume by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and left ventricular end-systolic volume index, measured in mL/m² by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months after procedure.
From baseline CMR to 6 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00003584
  • 1R56HL175516-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease

Subscribe