Non-Immersive Virtual Reality for Gait and Balance Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy (Rehametrics-CP)

May 22, 2026 updated by: Elizabeth Vidal, Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa

Non-Immersive Virtual Reality for Gait and Balance Training With Rehametrics in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Pre-post Single Group Pilot Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and user satisfaction of a non-immersive VR rehabilitation system, i.e. Rehametrics, for gait and balance training in children with CP in children between 4 to 10 years old. Secondary objectives include assessing the system's impact on functional mobility, gross motor function, balance, active participation, and user experience.

Primary hypothesis: rehabilitation intervention with Rehametrics is feasible and well accepted in a clinical setting for children with CP aged 4 to 10 years.

Participants will train exercises related to balance and gait using Rehametrics platform

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in childhood, affecting movement, muscle tone, and posture as a result of a non-progressive lesion in the developing brain. Children with CP frequently present with alterations in gait and postural control that significantly impact their daily functioning and quality of life. Although conventional physical therapy remains the cornerstone of rehabilitation, adherence and motivation are persistent challenges, particularly in pediatric populations. Non-immersive virtual reality (VR) systems, such as Rehametrics, which use standard screens and motion-capture sensors rather than head-mounted displays, offer an interactive, game-based rehabilitation environment that may enhance motivation, promote repetitive motor practice, and provide objective performance metrics to clinicians.

Objective The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and user satisfaction of a non-immersive VR rehabilitation system, i.e. Rehametrics, for gait and balance training in children with CP. Secondary objectives include assessing the system's impact on functional mobility, gross motor function, balance, active participation, and user experience.

Methods This is a pre-post single group pilot exploratory study. Ten children aged 4 to 10 years with a diagnosis of CP, confirmed by a pediatric neurologist, will be recruited from Centro Médico Pedro P. Diaz, Arequipa, Peru. Each participant will serve as their own control. The intervention consists of 9 sessions with Rehametrics, a non-immersive VR rehabilitation system designed to train gait and balance through interactive virtual scenarios. Outcome measures include: number of sessions completed, the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS), and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted by a trained physical therapist blinded to session performance data. Statistical analysis will use paired Student's t-test for normally distributed continuous variables and non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) for ordinal data.

Results Recruitment has not yet commenced. Results from this pilot study are expected to provide preliminary estimates of effect size and feasibility parameters to inform the design of a larger controlled trial.

Conclusions This protocol describes a novel application of Rehametrics, as a rehabilitation tool for children with CP. Findings will contribute evidence on the feasibility, satisfaction and preliminary clinical outcomes of game-based VR training targeting gait and balance in a pediatric rehabilitation setting in a middle income country context.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Peru
    • Arequipa
      • Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru, 54

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 4 and 10 years (inclusive) at the time of enrollment.
  • Confirmed clinical diagnosis of cerebral palsy documented in the medical record by a pediatric neurologist.
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I, II, or III
  • Ability to stand independently or with minimal assistance for at least 30 seconds.
  • Capacity to interact with a screen-based virtual environment (sufficient visual and cognitive ability to follow game instructions with therapist support).
  • Written informed consent provided by parent or legal guardian.
  • Availability to attend all scheduled sessions at the clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or uncontrolled epilepsy that contraindicates interaction with visual stimuli (photosensitive epilepsy).
  • Severe cognitive or behavioral impairment precluding participation in game-based VR interaction.
  • Presence of acute musculoskeletal injuries or recent surgical interventions (within the preceding 3 months) affecting lower limb function.
  • Participation in another rehabilitation research study during the study period.
  • Visual impairment not correctable with glasses or lenses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Feseability and User Satisfaction
Participant will use Rehametrics plataform for training balance and gait
Device: non inmersive VR System

The Rehametrics® platform is a CE-certified non-immersive virtual rehabilitation software that operates via a Microsoft Kinect sensor to capture full-body movement without contact-based sensors. . It provides over 80 motor, cognitive, and occupational therapy exercises structured as gamified tasks, with automatic difficulty adaptation based on real-time patient performance and multimodal feedback (visual, auditory, and performance). The system generates quantitative session reports, enabling clinicians to objectively monitor patient evolution over time.

To date, however, no published study has evaluated the Rehametrics system specifically in children with CP. Given the platform's CE medical device certification, its non-immersive, contact-free interaction mode, its capacity for progressive difficulty adaptation, particularly relevant for pediatric patients, and its ability to quantify motor performance objectively during sessions, it represents a clinically appropriate and technically

Other Names:
  • Rehametrics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of eligible participants who complete all scheduled sessions
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
This will assess the feasibility of the intervention.
Immediately after the intervention.
User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire for Virtual Rehabilitation Systems (USEQ) is a 6-item instrument developed specifically for virtual rehabilitation contexts (Gil-Gomez et al., 2017). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and evaluate: (1) ease of system use; (2) level of enjoyment during interaction; (3) interface clarity; (4) perceived usefulness; (5) degree of control during task execution; (6) willingness to use the system again. The USEQ will be administered to participants (or parents/guardians as proxy for younger children) and to the supervising physiotherapist at the end of the intervention period.
Immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Mobility - Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline (T-1), pre-intervention (T0) and immediately after the intervention (T1)
The TUG test measures functional mobility and dynamic balance. The participant rises from a standard chair, walks 3 meters, turns, returns to the chair, and sits. Time is recorded in seconds. Reliability and validity have been established for children with CP
Baseline (T-1), pre-intervention (T0) and immediately after the intervention (T1)
Gross Motor Function - GMFM-88
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) is a standardized, validated clinical observational instrument developed to evaluate gross motor function in children with CP (Russell et al., 2000, 2002). It comprises 88 items scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0 = does not initiate, 1 = initiates task <10%, 2 = partially completes task 10-99%, 3 = completes task 100%; NT = not tested). Items are grouped into five dimensions: (A) Lying and Rolling, (B) Sitting, (C) Crawling and Kneeling, (D) Standing, (E) Walking, Running and Jumping. Dimension scores are expressed as percentages of the maximum possible score, and the total score is the mean of the five dimension percentages.
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Balance - Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention, and immediately after the intervention
The Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) is an adaptation of the Berg Balance Scale specifically designed to evaluate static and dynamic balance in children with neurological, musculoskeletal, or developmental conditions (Chia-ling et al., 2013). It comprises 14 functional tasks, each scored 0 to 4 (0 = unable to perform; 4 = performs independently and correctly). Tasks include: sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, transfers, standing steady, feet-together standing, forward reach with extended arm, floor object retrieval from standing, turning to look behind, 360-degree turn, tandem standing, single-leg stance, single-leg balance, single-leg hopping, and standing on a soft surface.
Baseline, pre-intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Participation - Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS)
Time Frame: immediately after the procedure (end-of-session rating by the physiotherapist).
The PRPS is a 6-point clinician-rated scale measuring active patient participation during rehabilitation sessions (Lenze et al., 2004). Ratings: 1 = no participation in any session; 2 = no participation in at least half of sessions; 3 = participation in most exercises without maximum effort or incomplete; 4 = good participation in all exercises with good effort, most completed; 5 = very good participation with maximum effort, all completed; 6 = excellent participation with maximum effort, all completed, and active interest shown. The physical therapist will complete the PRPS at the end of each session.
immediately after the procedure (end-of-session rating by the physiotherapist).
User Experience Questionnaire - UEQ
Time Frame: Immediately after the Intervention
The User Experience Questionnaire description (UEQ) is a standardized instrument that evaluates six dimensions: (1) attractiveness, (2) efficiency, (3) perspicuity, (4) dependability, (5) stimulation, and (6) novelty. The UEQ comprises 26 items, rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The UEQ analyzes user experience results on a scale from -3 to +3, interpreted by ranges: 1.5 to 3.0 as very positive or excellent, 0.5 to 1.5 as positive or good, -0.5 to 0.5 as neutral, -1.5 to -0.5 as negative or low, and below -1.5 as very negative or poor. These ranges allow a quick assessment of the user's perception of the system
Immediately after the Intervention
Rehametrics performance scores
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure (session 1-9).
At each session, the Rehametrics software automatically records and exports session-level kinematic performance data for each participant. These parameters include joint range of motion, base of support, displacement of the center of gravity, and step height and characteristics. Additionally, the system records exercise completion scores (proportion of tasks successfully completed per session), total active movement time, and difficulty level reached per exercise. These data will be extracted from the system's automatic clinical reports at the end of each session and compiled longitudinally to track intra-subject performance evolution across the 9 sessions.
Immediately after the procedure (session 1-9).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emilia Biffi, Phd, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 21, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI_27_2024_UNSA
  • PI_27_2024 (Other Identifier: Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participant data will be stored using pseudonymized codes rather than names, preventing identification by persons outside the research team. No information that permits the identification of individual participants will be disclosed in any publication or presentation. All documents containing participant information will be stored in a locked cabinet in a restricted-access area. Digital data will be stored on password-protected systems accessible only to authorized study personnel. Personal identifiers and study codes will be stored in separate, locked locations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Clinical Trials on non inmersive VR System

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Liberia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe