- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07321366
Pilot Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of Cryoneurolysis Treatment in Disabling and/or Painful Hypertonia of the Shoulder and Elbow in Patients With Cerebral Palsy (OP-CRYO)
January 6, 2026 updated by: Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française
Efficacy and Tolerability of Cryoneurolysis Treatment in Disabling and/or Painful Hypertonia of the Shoulder and Elbow in Patients With Cerebral Palsy Who Have Reached a Therapeutic Impasse a Pilot Study
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the achievement of personalised short- and medium-term objectives of this selective treatment of hypertonia by ultrasound-guided perineural percutaneous cryoneurolysis at the shoulder and elbow, in a population of patients with cerebral palsy with spastic, dyskinetic or dyskinetic, or mixed disorders.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
40
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Rhône
-
Lyon, Rhône, France, 69003
- Recruiting
- CMCR des Massues
-
Contact:
- Dr Gaucher-Piola
- Phone Number: +33 4 72 38 48 02
- Email: julie.rozaire@croix-rouge.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cerebral palsy treated at the CMCR des Massues, regardless of their functional status as defined by their gross motor function level on the GMFCS (Gross Motor Function Classification System) and their manual ability level on the MACS (Manual Ability Classification System).
- Presenting with disabling and/or painful muscle hyperactivity in the shoulder and/or elbow,
- Aged over 12 years,
- At a therapeutic impasse: contraindicated or refusing surgery, contraindication or insufficient efficacy of oral treatments (analgesics, baclofen, Artane), too short duration of efficacy of toxin injections (<3 months) and/or dose-weight limitation not allowing treatment of all necessary sites.
- Patient (and legal representatives in the case of a minor patient or guardian/curator in the case of an adult patient under legal protection measures) who has been informed and has signed the informed consent form for participation in the research,
- Patient affiliated with a social security scheme.
Exclusion Criteria:
- - Patients who have received a botulinum toxin injection (any location) within 3 months prior to inclusion.
- Change in analgesic and/or antispastic treatment within 5 weeks prior to inclusion - Refusal to allow the patient's medical data to be used for research purposes
- Contraindication to peripheral motor block and/or cryoneurolysis (haemostasis disorder, skin infection, Raynaud's syndrome, cryoglobulinaemia, cold urticaria).
- Pregnant/breastfeeding patients.
- Cognitive and/or behavioural disorders that prevent participation in the study or giving consent to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cryoneurolise treatment
After testing the function following treatment with a motor block, the patient receives an indication for cryoneurolysis treatment.
|
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis (CN) is a new, minimally invasive approach that allows the treatment of hypertonia by reversibly blocking nerve conduction secondary to axonotmesis.
Although this approach has shown promising results with real benefits in the management of spasticity, its efficacy has not been determined in CP.
CN therefore represents a therapeutic alternative between toxin injections and radical surgery in the management of complex tone disorders in CP, for achieving individualised objectives, including pain relief.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Goal Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
Goal Assessment Scale is an individualized patient-centered outcome measure that quantifies the effects of an intervention based on personal goals.
It involves collaboration among patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to identify and set meaningful treatment goals.
GAS allows for the measurement of the extent to which these goals are met, providing a standardized approach to evaluate progress.
|
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical tolerability
Time Frame: After cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
The evaluation will be carried out, on the one hand, by quantifying the occurrence of adverse events following cryoneurolysis treatment.
Once the effects have been confirmed, classification will be carried out by referring to the different grades of clinical classification on the NCI CTCAE version 5.0 scale (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events).
|
After cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
|
Change in muscle structure
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
The change in muscle structure of the muscles innervated by the cryoneurolysed nerve will be assessed using the modified Heckmatt scale.
This scale allows for the evaluation of potential echogenic changes in spastic muscles (echogenicity), indicating the level of fibrotic change.
|
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
|
Muscle hyperactivity
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
The modified Ashworth scale (19,20) will be used to quantify spasticity in patients who exhibit resistance to passive mobilisation (muscle hyperactivity).
The average absolute variation in muscle response to stretching applied at given speeds will be assessed using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS).
|
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
|
Active range of motion
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
Active range of motion (AROM) - movement of a joint performed entirely by the person doing the exercise - and passive range of motion (PROM) - movement applied to a joint solely by another person - in the shoulder and elbow will be measured using a goniometer.
|
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
|
Joint Pain
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
To assess pain in relation to a specific location in the shoulder and/or elbow, several tools can be used. We will preferably use a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 to assess We prefer to use the Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 to assess the intensity of pain. According to this self-assessment scale, the patient requires pain management if VAS ≥ 4/10. |
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
|
Average Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
The average patient satisfaction in relation to the overall sensation in the event of a change will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), presented vertically to the patient and/or their carer.
This scale has two sides (depending on the patient's age and cognitive level), with one side illustrated by emoticons of different colours corresponding to a score of 0: not at all satisfied to 10: perfectly satisfied, and one side in the form of a graduated scale from 0 to 10.
|
1st visit, after cryoneurolysis treatment, 3 Months follow-up, 6 Months follow up, 9 Months follow-up, 12 Months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 22, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 22, 2025
First Posted (Estimated)
January 7, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 8, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 6, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025_06_OPCRYO_DM
- 2025-A01180-49 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy (CP)
-
Ibadat International University, IslamabadRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Athetoid CPPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
International Clinic of Rehabilitation, UkraineElita Rehabilitation CenterRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP)Ukraine
-
University of ThessalyNot yet recruiting
-
Baylor UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP)United States
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP)Turkey (Türkiye)