Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation After Lower Motor Neuron Damage

June 1, 2026 updated by: Peter J. Grahn, Ph.D.

Pilot Study: Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury-Related Lower Motor Neuron Damage

The purpose of this study is to study sensorimotor circuit activity generated in response to temporarily implanted dorsal root ganglion stimulation by recording from muscles of the lower extremities as well as functional outcomes achieved over a 10-day rehabilitation program in an individual with lower motor neuron injury.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI)
  • ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A-D
  • SCI below the tenth thoracic vertebral level
  • Greater than 1 year post-SCI
  • Intact spinal reflexes at or below injury level in 1 or more muscles

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently a prison inmate, or awaiting trial, related to criminal activity
  • Pregnancy at the time of screening for trial enrollment
  • Active, untreated urinary tract infection
  • Unhealed decubitus ulcer
  • Unhealed skeletal fracture
  • Spinal abnormality that may impede percutaneous implantation of spinal electrodes
  • Untreated clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorder
  • Joint contractures that impede typical range of motion
  • Non-MRI-compatible implanted medical devices
  • Other implanted stimulation devices (e.g., deep brain stimulator, cardiac pacemaker, diaphragmatic pacer, etc.)
  • Active participation in an interventional clinical trial which, based on the research team's assessment, may compromise protocol compliance, safety, and/or validity of data collected during this study
  • History of clinically diagnosed cardiopulmonary disorder, such as severe orthostatic hypotension, which may impede participation in rehabilitation activities such as changes in body position such as supine-to-sit-to-stand activities, prolonged standing, or stepping
  • History of frequent and/or severe autonomic dysreflexia
  • History of seizure disorder
  • Any illness or condition which, based on the research team's assessment, will compromise with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, patient safety, or the validity of the data collected during this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation
One adult patient with spinal cord injury below T10 will be treated with dorsal root ganglion stimulation.
After temporary implantation of leads into the dorsal root ganglia of lower spine, the patient will undergo 2-3 hour sessions over 10 days. Each session will consist of rehabilitation exercises will receiving electrical spinal stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change America Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale categorization
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days
The America Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale is a provider assessment that categorizes spinal cord injuries into five distinct classifications, each representing different degrees of neurological impairment and functional preservation. Categories are defined as Grade A: complete impairment; Grade B: sensory but not motor function preserved; Grade C: motor function incomplete (most muscles): Grade D: motor function incomplete (half of key muscles); and Grade E: normal sensory and motor functions.
Baseline, 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neurogenic Bladder Symptom (NBSS) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days
The Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) survey a 24-item validated instrument that incorporates questions on bladder management, incontinence, storage, voiding and consequences and the impact on quality of life. Total scores range from 0 - 74, with higher scores indicating more severe bladder symptoms and dysfunction.
Baseline, 14 days
Change in Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Survey (NBD) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days
The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Survey (NBD) a validated questionnaire that incorporates several questions regarding fecal incontinence, constipation, obstruction, and impact on quality of life. Each of the 10 items on the NBD is weighted according to its importance on quality of life. Total scores range from 0 -47, with higher scores indicating more severe bowel dysfunction.
Baseline, 14 days
Change in sexual function survey score
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days
International spinal cord injury female sexual and reproductive function basic data set (version 2.0) or International spinal cord injury male sexual function basic data set (version 2.0) will be used depending on subject enrolled. The survey asks the participant to answer 4 questions regarding sexual dysfunction as related to spinal cord injury, with answers on a scale of 0 = normal, 1 = reduced or altered, and 2 = absent. Higher scores indicate a greater level of impairment.
Baseline, 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter J. Grahn, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Abbot Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulator

Subscribe