- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07638553
Efficacy in Relapse Prevention: Psilocybin in Alcohol Use Disorder With Depressive Symptoms (ERPPAD)
Up to 40% of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) experience depression, which increases the risk of early relapse. Depression can cause relapse to occur 3 times faster in individuals with AUD who experience depressive symptoms at discharge. No treatments have been approved for individuals with both AUD and depression. Psilocybin, a psychedelic, shows promising results in treating both depression and addiction. It may be particularly effective for preventing relapse in people with AUD who also have depressive symptoms after detoxification, offering quicker action than traditional antidepressants.
The Psilocybin Alcohol Depression (PAD) pilot study, launched in February 2024, has provided critical insights for avoiding methodological flaws and demonstrated that psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) is both feasible and acceptable. Preliminary efficacy analyses were conducted: at 12 weeks, the 25 mg group showed significantly greater reductions in drinking days (p = 0.038) and craving frequency (p = 0.045). Relapse rates were 35% in the 25 mg group and 50% in the control group (HR = 0.52 [0.16-1.65]). In the ERPPAD trial, the study authors will compare high-dose PAP with low-dose PAP in preventing relapse in individuals with AUD and depressive symptoms. The hypothesis is that high-dose PAP will be more effective than low-dose in preventing relapse over 6 months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Amandine Luquiens
- Phone Number: 04.66.68.69.98
- Email: amandine.luquiens@chu-nimes.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bayonne, France
- Centre Hospitalier de la Cote Basque
-
Contact:
- Sophie-Athéna CHARPON
- Phone Number: 05 59 44 42 19
- Email: sachapron@ch-cotebasque.fr
-
Besançon, France
- CHU Besancon
-
Contact:
- Julie GIUSTNIANI
- Phone Number: 03.81.21.90.08
- Email: jgiustiniani@chu-besancon.fr
-
Bordeaux, France
- CHU de Bordeaux
-
Contact:
- Mélina FATSEAS
- Phone Number: 05 47 75 75 75
- Email: melina.fatseas@u-bordeaux.fr
-
Brest, France
- CHU Brest
-
Contact:
- Morgane GUILLOU
- Phone Number: 02 98 34 23 48
- Email: morgane.guillou@chu-brest.fr
-
Bron, France
- CH le vinatier
-
Contact:
- Benjamin ROLLAND
- Phone Number: 04 37 91 50 75
- Email: benjamin.rolland@univ-lyon1.fr
-
Nantes, France
- CHU de Nantes
-
Contact:
- Marie GRALL-BRONNEC
- Phone Number: 02.40.20.66.40
- Email: marie.bronnec@chu-nantes.fr
-
Nîmes, France, 30029
- CHU de Nîmes
-
Contact:
- Anissa Megzari
- Phone Number: 04.66.68.42.36
- Email: drc@chu-nimes.fr
-
Saint-Priest, France
- CHU Saint-Etienne
-
Contact:
- Aurélia GAY
- Phone Number: 04 77 12 02 31
- Email: aurelia.gay@chu-st-etienne.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of severe AUD.
- Scale BDI-II ((Beck Depression Inventory) ≥14
- The last drink must have been consumed between day(D) -60 and D -10 at the inclusion visit. The patient must have had at least 1 HDD during the last drinking period NB: The last drinking period before inclusion is defined by the last 4 weeks counted from the last drink.
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
Exclusion Criteria:
- The subject is participating in an interventional study, a clinical trial, or a clinical investigation or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- Patient unable to give informed consent.
- Participants planning to donate sperm within three months of psilocybin administration
- Positive pregnancy test at inclusion for participants of childbearing age.
- Patient who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or wishing to become pregnant during participation in the study.
- Any use of classical psychedelic in the last year
- Other current substance use disorder (except tobacco)
- Diagnosed schizophrenic or bipolar disorder
- High emotional lability (clinician-judged)
- On antipsychotics treatment that may interfere with psilocybin.
- Need for monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) treatment, which may interfere with psilocybin.
- Severe suicidal ideation (high risk on the Columbia scale)
- 1st degree family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder
- Severe cognitive impairment (clinician-judged)
- CIWA-AR > 8
- Medical conditions that would preclude safe participation in the trial, for example: seizure disorders; significant impairment of hepatic function; coronary artery disease; history of arrhythmia; Abnormal QT interval prolongation (QTc > 470 ms for women and >450 ms for men); heart failure; uncontrolled hypertension (greater than 165/95 mmHg at screening); history of stroke; severe asthma; hyperthyroidism; narrow-angle glaucoma; stenosing gastroduodenal ulcer; pyloroduodenal obstruction; symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction; uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes, or a history of ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic coma, or severe hypoglycemia with loss of consciousness.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High dose psilocybin
2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart
|
2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Low-dose psilocybin
2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart
|
2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of relapse between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Relapse Yes/no, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
Month 6
|
|
Time to relapse between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Days until relapse, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sex
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Day 0
|
|
|
Change in relapse rate between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in rate of heavy drinking days between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in total alcohol consumption between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in number of drinking days between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in craving between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in alcohol-related quality of life between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.
|
At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in anxiety between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in emotional dysregulation between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in rejection sensitivity between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD
|
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
|
|
Visual Perspective task (VPT)
Time Frame: Day 0
|
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
|
Day 0
|
|
Visual Perspective task (VPT)
Time Frame: Week 3
|
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
|
Week 3
|
|
Visual Perspective task (VPT) for participants opting for a third dose
Time Frame: Week 28
|
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
|
Week 28
|
|
Request for a 3rd dose of psilocybin between groups
Time Frame: Week 27
|
Yes/no
|
Week 27
|
|
Reason for 3rd dose request
Time Frame: Week 27
|
Relapse in AUD/ risk of relapse in AUD/low self-efficacy/ relapse in depression/ personal development/ other
|
Week 27
|
|
Administration of 3rd dose
Time Frame: Week 28
|
Yes/no
|
Week 28
|
|
Relapse rate in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Rate of heavy drinking days in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Total alcohol consumption in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in number of drinking days in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in craving in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in alcohol-related quality of life in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in depressive symptoms in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II).
The total score is the sum of the 21 item scores, ranging from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in anxiety in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in emotional dysregulation in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in rejection sensitivity in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD
|
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
|
|
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire
|
Day 0
|
|
Attachment style
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ) for attachment style (secure, fearful, preoccupied, dismissing)
|
Day 0
|
|
Severity of aocohol use disorder
Time Frame: Day 0
|
The Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S)
|
Day 0
|
|
Cognitive impairments
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
|
Day 0
|
|
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 0
|
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
|
Prior to integration session in Week 0
|
|
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 3
|
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
|
Prior to integration session in Week 3
|
|
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose
|
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
|
Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose
|
|
Age
Time Frame: Day 0
|
years
|
Day 0
|
|
Currently under antidepressant at the inclusion
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Yes/no
|
Day 0
|
|
Diagnosed with ADHD
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Yes/no
|
Day 0
|
|
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 0
|
Dosing session in week 0
|
|
|
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 3
|
Dosing session in week 3
|
|
|
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 28 if third dose
|
Dosing session in week 28 if third dose
|
|
|
Safety and tolerance of psilocybin
Time Frame: End of study, week 51
|
List of adverse events
|
End of study, week 51
|
|
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
|
fL
|
At week 28 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
|
U/L
|
At week 28 compared to baseline
|
|
Change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
|
Percentage
|
At week 28 compared to baseline
|
|
Guess the group
Time Frame: After dosing session Week 0
|
Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework
|
After dosing session Week 0
|
|
Guess the group
Time Frame: After dosing session Week 3
|
Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework
|
After dosing session Week 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amandine Luquiens, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PHRC-N/2024/AL-01
- 2025-525069-65-00 (Ctis)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder
-
Washington State UniversityRecruitingNicotine Use Disorder | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
Technische Universität DresdenCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimRecruitingAlcoholism | Methamphetamine-dependence | Substance Use Disorders | Cocaine Use Disorder | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) | Cannabis Use Disorder | Amphetamine Use DisorderGermany
-
Indiana UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingAdolescent | Alcohol Use | Mild Alcohol Use Disorder | Mild Substance Use DisorderUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedAlcohol Use Disorder, Mild | Alcohol Use Disorder, ModerateUnited States
-
University of BernRecruitingAlcohol Use Disorder (AUD) | Substance Use Disorder (SUD) | Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD)Switzerland
-
Université du Québec à Trois-RivièresCompletedAlcohol Use, Unspecified | Alcohol Use Disorder, MildCanada
-
Woebot HealthStanford UniversityCompletedSubstance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingAlcohol Use Disorder | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); National Institutes...RecruitingAlcohol Drinking | Substance Use | Alcohol Use Disorder | Drinking, Alcohol | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)United States
-
ITAB - Institute for Advanced Biomedical TechnologiesNot yet recruitingNeurobiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Alcohol Use DisorderAlcohol Dependence | Alcohol-Related Disorders | Substance Use Disorders | Drug Abuse | Mental Disorder | Alcohol Abuse | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
Clinical Trials on Psilocybin (high dose)
-
Yale UniversityCeruvia LifesciencesCompleted
-
Yale UniversityTerminated
-
University of CalgaryRecruitingInvestigating the Importance of the Subjective Psychedelic ExperienceCanada
-
Brugmann University HospitalRecruiting
-
Francisco A MorenoUniversity of ArizonaNot yet recruiting
-
University of PennsylvaniaRecruiting
-
Nantes University HospitalNot yet recruitingPsilocybin AsSisted pSychotherapy for the treatmENt of Gambling disordER : a Pilot Study (PASSENGER)Gambling DisorderFrance
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedHealthyUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySteven & Alexandra Cohen FoundationEnrolling by invitationPsilocybin | Music InterventionUnited States
-
Yale UniversityHeffter Research InstituteActive, not recruitingMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States