Efficacy in Relapse Prevention: Psilocybin in Alcohol Use Disorder With Depressive Symptoms (ERPPAD)

Up to 40% of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) experience depression, which increases the risk of early relapse. Depression can cause relapse to occur 3 times faster in individuals with AUD who experience depressive symptoms at discharge. No treatments have been approved for individuals with both AUD and depression. Psilocybin, a psychedelic, shows promising results in treating both depression and addiction. It may be particularly effective for preventing relapse in people with AUD who also have depressive symptoms after detoxification, offering quicker action than traditional antidepressants.

The Psilocybin Alcohol Depression (PAD) pilot study, launched in February 2024, has provided critical insights for avoiding methodological flaws and demonstrated that psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) is both feasible and acceptable. Preliminary efficacy analyses were conducted: at 12 weeks, the 25 mg group showed significantly greater reductions in drinking days (p = 0.038) and craving frequency (p = 0.045). Relapse rates were 35% in the 25 mg group and 50% in the control group (HR = 0.52 [0.16-1.65]). In the ERPPAD trial, the study authors will compare high-dose PAP with low-dose PAP in preventing relapse in individuals with AUD and depressive symptoms. The hypothesis is that high-dose PAP will be more effective than low-dose in preventing relapse over 6 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

172

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of severe AUD.
  • Scale BDI-II ((Beck Depression Inventory) ≥14
  • The last drink must have been consumed between day(D) -60 and D -10 at the inclusion visit. The patient must have had at least 1 HDD during the last drinking period NB: The last drinking period before inclusion is defined by the last 4 weeks counted from the last drink.
  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, a clinical trial, or a clinical investigation or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • Patient unable to give informed consent.
  • Participants planning to donate sperm within three months of psilocybin administration
  • Positive pregnancy test at inclusion for participants of childbearing age.
  • Patient who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or wishing to become pregnant during participation in the study.
  • Any use of classical psychedelic in the last year
  • Other current substance use disorder (except tobacco)
  • Diagnosed schizophrenic or bipolar disorder
  • High emotional lability (clinician-judged)
  • On antipsychotics treatment that may interfere with psilocybin.
  • Need for monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) treatment, which may interfere with psilocybin.
  • Severe suicidal ideation (high risk on the Columbia scale)
  • 1st degree family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder
  • Severe cognitive impairment (clinician-judged)
  • CIWA-AR > 8
  • Medical conditions that would preclude safe participation in the trial, for example: seizure disorders; significant impairment of hepatic function; coronary artery disease; history of arrhythmia; Abnormal QT interval prolongation (QTc > 470 ms for women and >450 ms for men); heart failure; uncontrolled hypertension (greater than 165/95 mmHg at screening); history of stroke; severe asthma; hyperthyroidism; narrow-angle glaucoma; stenosing gastroduodenal ulcer; pyloroduodenal obstruction; symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction; uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes, or a history of ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic coma, or severe hypoglycemia with loss of consciousness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High dose psilocybin
2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart
2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart
Placebo Comparator: Low-dose psilocybin
2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart
2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of relapse between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
Relapse Yes/no, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
Month 6
Time to relapse between groups
Time Frame: Month 6
Days until relapse, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sex
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Change in relapse rate between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in rate of heavy drinking days between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in total alcohol consumption between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in number of drinking days between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in craving between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in alcohol-related quality of life between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.
At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in anxiety between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in emotional dysregulation between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in rejection sensitivity between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD
At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline
Visual Perspective task (VPT)
Time Frame: Day 0
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
Day 0
Visual Perspective task (VPT)
Time Frame: Week 3
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
Week 3
Visual Perspective task (VPT) for participants opting for a third dose
Time Frame: Week 28
This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias
Week 28
Request for a 3rd dose of psilocybin between groups
Time Frame: Week 27
Yes/no
Week 27
Reason for 3rd dose request
Time Frame: Week 27
Relapse in AUD/ risk of relapse in AUD/low self-efficacy/ relapse in depression/ personal development/ other
Week 27
Administration of 3rd dose
Time Frame: Week 28
Yes/no
Week 28
Relapse rate in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Rate of heavy drinking days in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Total alcohol consumption in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in number of drinking days in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in craving in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in alcohol-related quality of life in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in depressive symptoms in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The total score is the sum of the 21 item scores, ranging from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in anxiety in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in emotional dysregulation in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in rejection sensitivity in relapsers between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups
Time Frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD
At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Time Frame: Day 0
The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire
Day 0
Attachment style
Time Frame: Day 0
The Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ) for attachment style (secure, fearful, preoccupied, dismissing)
Day 0
Severity of aocohol use disorder
Time Frame: Day 0
The Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S)
Day 0
Cognitive impairments
Time Frame: Day 0
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Day 0
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 0
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
Prior to integration session in Week 0
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 3
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
Prior to integration session in Week 3
Features of the psychedelic experience
Time Frame: Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose
Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)
Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose
Age
Time Frame: Day 0
years
Day 0
Currently under antidepressant at the inclusion
Time Frame: Day 0
Yes/no
Day 0
Diagnosed with ADHD
Time Frame: Day 0
Yes/no
Day 0
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 0
Dosing session in week 0
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 3
Dosing session in week 3
In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration
Time Frame: Dosing session in week 28 if third dose
Dosing session in week 28 if third dose
Safety and tolerance of psilocybin
Time Frame: End of study, week 51
List of adverse events
End of study, week 51
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
fL
At week 28 compared to baseline
Change in carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
U/L
At week 28 compared to baseline
Change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) between groups and subgroups
Time Frame: At week 28 compared to baseline
Percentage
At week 28 compared to baseline
Guess the group
Time Frame: After dosing session Week 0
Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework
After dosing session Week 0
Guess the group
Time Frame: After dosing session Week 3
Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework
After dosing session Week 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amandine Luquiens, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Psilocybin (high dose)

Subscribe