Role of Pavlovian Mechanisms for Control Over Substance Use (ReCoDe)

November 19, 2024 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden

SFB TRR 265: Losing and Regaining Control Over Drug Intake Work Package 1 of Project B03: General and Specific Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer Effects in a Range of Substance Use Disorders

During the first funding period (1st FP), the investigators developed a novel full Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task that allows assessing both, general and specific PIT to investigate whether specific PIT differs between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and control subjects. Preliminary analyses of the full transfer task indicate that AUD participants exhibit a stronger specific PIT effect compared to controls. Based on these findings, the investigators want to compare specific and general PIT effects in patients with moderate to severe substance use disorders (alcohol, cannabis, methamphetamine, amphetamine and cocaine) to healthy controls on the behavioral and neural level (fMRI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This projects research aim:

1. The investigators aim to compare general and specific PIT effects in patients with moderate to severe substance use disorder (Alcohol, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine and Cocaine) and healthy controls using the newly developed (1st FP) full transfer task and fMRI The investigators expect enhanced general PIT effects in patients compared to controls at the behavioral level, and at the neuronal level enhanced PIT-associated activations in the striatum, and lower activation in the prefrontal cortex (e.g., dlPFC).

The investigators expect enhanced general PIT effects in patients with multiple SUD compared to patients with single SUD.

The investigators expect increased behavioral and neuronal alcohol-specific PIT effects in patients groups that also meet AUD criteria compared to controls and to patients without AUD.

The investigators expect stronger behavioral and neural PIT effects (both general and specific) to predict more substance use at 3-month follow-up.

Therefore, the investigators aim to conduct the Experiments with the following Hypotheses:

Here the investigators assess on a behavioral and neural level a general and specific PIT task by using the full transfer task which was developed in the 1st FP and allows the assessment of both PIT tasks in one paradigm. This task consists of 4 parts: instrumental training, Pavlovian conditioning, Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer phase and query trials to test participants' explicit knowledge.

The investigators will investigate HCs and three patient groups of high clinical relevance: Patients with (1) AUD without comorbid SUD (cannabis, methamphetamine, amphetamine or cocaine), (2) AUD with comorbid SUD (cannabis and/or methamphetamine and/or amphetamine and/or cocaine), (3) SUD (cannabis and/or methamphetamine and/or amphetamine and/or cocaine) without AUD. The investigators will recruit patients through the addiction outpatient clinic of the Charité (mainly cannabis), the special outpatient clinic for MUD at the University Hospital Dresden as well as the investigators' strategic partner clinic in Radebeul und Städtisches Klinikum Dresden. Furthermore, the investigators will be recruiting from the general population using advertisement. On site, they undergo the comprehensive assessment implemented for the TRR cohort during the 1st FP. The full PIT paradigm is applied as described in Figure 3. Three months after the examination, an online follow-up on the clinical course will be done by using redcap-based questionnaires.

Methods:

WP1 will follow an ANOVA with four groups, including post-hoc group differences.

Functional imaging data will be conducted using a 3 T MR scanner to acquire gradient echo t2*-weighted echo-planar images (EPI) and analyzed with SPM12. EPI images will be preprocessed and analyzed as implemented during the 1st FP.

Expected results:

The investigators expect that general PIT effects are increased in all patient groups vs. HCs. Moreover, the investigators expect that patients with AUD + comorbid SUD have greater general PIT effects than patients with AUD alone. Concerning alcohol specific PIT, the investigators expect that both AUD groups, but not patients with SUD without AUD have greater effects than HCs. Moreover, the investigators expect that patients with AUD + comorbid SUD have greater alcohol specific PIT effects than patients with AUD alone. Concerning neuroimaging, the investigators expect greater activations in striatum and reduced activation in the DLPFC during PIT in all patient groups vs. HCs. Moreover, the investigators expect greater activations in striatum and reduced activation in the DLPFC in patients with AUD + comorbid SUD as well as in patients with AUD alone. Of note, the investigators expect similar neural activations during specific PIT in HCs and patients with SUD without AUD.

Hypothesis 1a.:

General PIT effects are increased in all patient groups vs. HCs. Specifically, patients with AUD + comorbid SUD will show greater general PIT effects than patients with AUD alone. At the neuronal level patients will show enhanced PIT-associated activations in the striatum, and lower activation in the prefrontal cortex (e.g., dlPFC).

Hypothesis 1b:

Concerning alcohol specific PIT, it is expected that both AUD groups, but not patients with SUD without AUD have greater effects than HC. Moreover, patients with AUD + comorbid SUD will have greater alcohol specific PIT effects than patients with AUD alone. Moreover, the investigators expect greater activations in striatum and reduced activation in the DLPFC in patients with AUD + comorbid SUD as well as in patients with AUD alone.

Hypothesis 1c:

The investigators expect that enhanced specific and general PIT effects are associated with increased substance use at the 3-month follow-up.

Alternative strategies: In case of doubt about the extent to which gustatory alcohol and juice rewards increase the PIT effect in subjects with comorbid SUD, the investigators might alternatively develop and pilot a specific PIT paradigm with substance-related pictures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dresden, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden
        • Contact:
          • Maximilian Pilhatsch, Prof. Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Michael N. Smolka, Prof. Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Heinz, Prof. Dr.
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Michael Smolka, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Groups will be recruited through the addiction in- and outpatient clinic of the Charité, and from the special outpatient clinic for MUD at the University Hospital Dresden as well as from our strategic partner clinic in Radebeul and Städtisches Klinikum Dresden. Moreover, collaborating clinics in Berlin and Dresden will be recruited (with in- or outpatient clinics for treating patients with substance use disorder). Finally, we recruit persons from information centers for substance related problems and addiction groups in Berlin and Dresden and from the general population using advertisement.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women between 18-65 years of age,
  • AUD, and/or SUD subjects only: meet 4 or more criteria for DSM-5 alcohol-related and/or substance-related (cannabis, amphetamine, methamphetamine or cocaine disorder (not requiring withdrawal as assessed by an independent psychiatrist),
  • Currently using alcohol without a desire for abstinence
  • Ability to consent to the study and complete the questionnaires.
  • Sufficient language(German) and motor skills for using PC
  • existing health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lifetime diagnosis of DSM-5 bipolar disorder or schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (if induced by drugs, it should happen more than a month ago)
  • Current threshold DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder, or presence of suicidal intention
  • High risk (≤ 26) ASSIST scores in other substances other than alcohol, amphetamine, methamphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, tobacco
  • History of traumatic brain injury or severe neurological disease (such as Dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Epilepsy, Meningitis, Stroke)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
  • Ingestion of medications known to interact with the dopamine system in the 10-day period prior to study participation or less than 4 half-lives after last ingestion (rapid urine test); A detailed list of permitted medication can be added upon request
  • MR contraindications (e.g., pacemakers, metallic or electronic implants, metallic splinters, surgical staples)
  • Color vision deficiency
  • sensorineural hearing loss of 30 dB or greater,
  • Tinnitus and
  • Acute alcohol, substance (cannabis, or methamphetamine, amphetamine, cocaine) intoxication at assessement day verified by breath alcohol tests and drug intoxication verified by rapid urine test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Alcohol use disorder (AUD)
Participants with alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe if no withdrawal symptoms) and no other substance use disorder (SUD)
Will be used to investigate neural correlates of PIT effects by identifying abnormalities in cortical gray and white matter volume.

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effects by measuring the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response of neural activation in the mesolimbic system.
  • Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, Cannabis, (Meth-) Amphetamine, Cocaine)
  • SCID: AUD and SUD (Cannabis, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Cocaine) criteria and last year & depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder (acute and lifetime) MiniDIPS psychotic disorders
  • Sociodemographics
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T and STAI-S)
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühle 14 Items (FGG-14)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU-K14)
  • Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress (TICS)
  • Oslo 3-Items-Social-Support Scale (Oslo-3)
  • Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
  • International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
  • Digit-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Digit Span Task
  • Value-based decision-making task (VBDM)
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and Substance use disorder (SUD)

Participants with Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and comorbid Substance use disorder (SUD) (moderate to severe cases without withdrawal symptoms) including:

Participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and/or cannabis use disorder and/or methamphetamine use disorder and/or amphetamine use disorder and/or cocaine use disorder.

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of PIT effects by identifying abnormalities in cortical gray and white matter volume.

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effects by measuring the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response of neural activation in the mesolimbic system.
  • Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, Cannabis, (Meth-) Amphetamine, Cocaine)
  • SCID: AUD and SUD (Cannabis, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Cocaine) criteria and last year & depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder (acute and lifetime) MiniDIPS psychotic disorders
  • Sociodemographics
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T and STAI-S)
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühle 14 Items (FGG-14)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU-K14)
  • Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress (TICS)
  • Oslo 3-Items-Social-Support Scale (Oslo-3)
  • Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
  • International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
  • Digit-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Digit Span Task
  • Value-based decision-making task (VBDM)
Non-AUD Substance use disorder (SUD)

Participants with substance use disorder (moderate to severe cases without withdrawal symptoms) without alcohol use disorder (AUD) including:

Participants with methamphetamine use disorder and/or cannabis use disorder and/or amphetamine use disorder and/or cocaine use disorder

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of PIT effects by identifying abnormalities in cortical gray and white matter volume.

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effects by measuring the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response of neural activation in the mesolimbic system.
  • Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, Cannabis, (Meth-) Amphetamine, Cocaine)
  • SCID: AUD and SUD (Cannabis, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Cocaine) criteria and last year & depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder (acute and lifetime) MiniDIPS psychotic disorders
  • Sociodemographics
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T and STAI-S)
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühle 14 Items (FGG-14)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU-K14)
  • Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress (TICS)
  • Oslo 3-Items-Social-Support Scale (Oslo-3)
  • Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
  • International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
  • Digit-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Digit Span Task
  • Value-based decision-making task (VBDM)
Control group
Healthy participants without AUD or SUD
Will be used to investigate neural correlates of PIT effects by identifying abnormalities in cortical gray and white matter volume.

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Will be used to investigate neural correlates of Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effects by measuring the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response of neural activation in the mesolimbic system.
  • Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, Cannabis, (Meth-) Amphetamine, Cocaine)
  • SCID: AUD and SUD (Cannabis, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Cocaine) criteria and last year & depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder (acute and lifetime) MiniDIPS psychotic disorders
  • Sociodemographics
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T and STAI-S)
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühle 14 Items (FGG-14)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU-K14)
  • Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress (TICS)
  • Oslo 3-Items-Social-Support Scale (Oslo-3)
  • Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
  • International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
  • Digit-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Digit Span Task
  • Value-based decision-making task (VBDM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neural PIT effect
Time Frame: 1 day
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response, investigation of neuronal activation of the mesolimbic system in AUD patients and controls using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
1 day
Behavioral full-lever specific and general PIT effect
Time Frame: 1 day

Strength of specific and general PIT effect assessed with the full-lever PIT paradigm.

Specific: average percentage of alcohol choice difference during the presentation of alcohol or non-alcohol Pavlovian background. General: differences in number of button presses during the presentation of positive (+10 Euro) and negative (-10 Euro) Pavlovian backgrounds.

1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol and Substance (cannabis, stimulant/cocaine) consumption after 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after testing for behavioral and neural PIT effects
Alcohol drinking amount and substance (cannabis, amphetamine, cocaine) consuming amount (quantity, frequency) during a follow-up period of 3 months
3 months after testing for behavioral and neural PIT effects

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcoholism

Clinical Trials on sMRI (structure)

Subscribe