Effect of Pressure Biofeedback Training After Ventral Hernioplasty

June 7, 2026 updated by: Mai Ayman Abdellatiff, Cairo University

EFFECT OF PRESSURE BIOFEEDBACK ON ABDOMINAL MUSCLES STRENGTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE POST VENTRAL HERNIOPLASTY

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of pressure biofeedback training on abdominal muscle strength and quality of life in adults following ventral hernioplasty. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there a significant effect of pressure biofeedback training on abdominal muscle strength in patients following ventral hernioplasty?
  • Is there a significant effect of pressure biofeedback training on quality of life in patients following ventral hernioplasty?

Researchers will compare the effect of adding pressure biofeedback training to a conventional physical therapy program versus a conventional physical therapy program alone to determine whether pressure biofeedback training provides additional benefits in improving abdominal muscle strength and quality of life following ventral hernioplasty.

Participants in the study group will receive pressure biofeedback training in addition to the conventional physical therapy program, while participants in the control group will receive the conventional physical therapy program only.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both males and females
  • Their ages ranged 35 to 50
  • Their BMI ranged from 18.5 to 27
  • All patients were suffering from muscles weakness post-ventral hernioplasty
  • All patients began the treatment program 8 weeks post-ventral hernioplasty
  • All patients received the same postoperative physical therapy program
  • Informed consent was obtained from every patient enrolled in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Postpartum less than 6 months.
  • Peritonitis
  • Bruising or swelling of the abdominal wall.
  • Infection
  • Musculoskeletal impairments that may hinder the treatment process.
  • Orthopedic impairment that may hinder the treatment process.
  • Lumbar surgery in the past year.
  • Spinal stenosis.
  • Neurological disease.
  • Trauma to the lumbar spine.
  • Nerve root entrapment.
  • Cancer.
  • Pre-existing impairment of cardiac function.
  • Bone metastasis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
A conventional physical therapy program will include abdominal muscle strengthening without pressure biofeedback device.
Experimental: study group
participants in study group will receive 30 mins and 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
A conventional physical therapy program will include abdominal muscle strengthening without pressure biofeedback device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
abdominal muscle strength
Time Frame: Measurements were taken at the baseline (pre-treatment), after 8 weeks (post-treatment), and after 14 weeks as a follow-up.
  • Abdominal muscle strength assessment was performed using a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) to evaluate the activation of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle.
  • Participants were positioned in a prone lying position on a firm surface, with their arms relaxed by their sides.
  • The PBU was placed under the abdomen such that the navel is centered on the device, and the distal edge is aligned with the right and left anterior superior iliac spines.
  • The cuff was inflated to 70 mmHg and allowed to stabilize. Normal breathing fluctuations (approximately ±2 mmHg) will be noted, after which participants will be instructed to perform the abdominal draw-in maneuver.
  • A pressure reduction of 6-10 mmHg is expected.
  • A reduction in pressure held for a minimum of 10 seconds is considered a successful activation of the TrA.
  • The procedure was repeated three times, and the average reduction of the three readings was used for analysis; higher scores indicate better abdominal muscle strength.
Measurements were taken at the baseline (pre-treatment), after 8 weeks (post-treatment), and after 14 weeks as a follow-up.
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Measurements were taken at the baseline (pre-treatment), after 8 weeks (post-treatment), and after 14 weeks as a follow-up.
The Arabic version of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after the intervention. The SF-12 consists of 12 items covering eight health domains: General Health, Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Vitality. Responses were scored using the standard SF-12 scoring algorithm, which applies specific weights to each item according to its contribution to physical and mental health. Weighted scores were combined to generate the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Both scores are standardized on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL. Changes in pre- and post-intervention scores were used to evaluate the intervention effect.
Measurements were taken at the baseline (pre-treatment), after 8 weeks (post-treatment), and after 14 weeks as a follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/006111

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia Repair

Clinical Trials on pressure biofeedback training

Subscribe