Comparative Evaluation of Preoperative Preparation Methods in Patients With Large Incisional Hernias (AWR-PREP)

Comparative Evaluation of Different Preoperative Optimization Strategies in Patients With Large, Complex, and Giant Incisional Hernias

Patients with large, complex, or giant incisional hernias often require advanced preoperative optimization to facilitate safe abdominal wall reconstruction and reduce postoperative complications. Several strategies are currently used in clinical practice, including botulinum toxin A injection, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, and their combination. However, the optimal differentiated approach based on hernia characteristics and abdominal wall tissue deficiency remains unclear.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different preoperative preparation strategies in patients with large postoperative ventral hernias and loss of abdominal wall domain. Outcomes of patients receiving botulinum toxin A, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, combined preparation, or no specific preparation will be analyzed.

The study will evaluate operative feasibility, ability to achieve fascial closure, postoperative complications, recurrence, and overall treatment outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Large and giant incisional hernias remain a major challenge in abdominal wall surgery. In patients with loss of domain, reduced abdominal cavity volume, lateral muscle retraction, and soft tissue deficiency, standard hernia repair may be associated with high tension closure, respiratory compromise, abdominal compartment syndrome, wound complications, and recurrence.

Preoperative optimization techniques such as chemical component relaxation with botulinum toxin A and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum have been increasingly used to improve abdominal wall compliance and restore abdominal domain. Combined use of these methods may provide additional benefit in selected patients.

The present prospective comparative study is designed to assess a differentiated treatment strategy in which the method of preoperative preparation is selected according to clinical and anatomical characteristics of the hernia defect.

Participants will be allocated to one of the following groups:

Botulinum toxin A Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum Combined botulinum toxin A plus pneumoperitoneum No specific preoperative preparation

Primary and secondary outcomes may include technical feasibility of repair, need for component separation, successful fascial closure, perioperative morbidity, hospital stay, recurrence rate, and patient recovery.

The results of this study may help optimize patient selection and develop evidence-based algorithms for management of complex abdominal wall defects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Krasnodarskiy Kray
      • Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Kray, Russia, 350000
        • Recruiting
        • Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No.1
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Patients with ventral incisional hernia requiring elective surgical repair
  • Large and/or complex hernia defects requiring preoperative preparation
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Emergency surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications to botulinum toxin A injection or progressive pneumoperitoneum
  • Severe uncontrolled comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Inability or refusal to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Botulinum Toxin A
Preoperative chemical relaxation of the lateral abdominal wall muscles using botulinum toxin A before hernia repair.
Preoperative injection of botulinum toxin A into the lateral abdominal wall musculature.
Experimental: Progressive Pneumoperitoneum
Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum used to increase abdominal cavity capacity before reconstruction.
Gradual insufflation of the peritoneal cavity before surgery.
Experimental: Combined Preparation
Combination of botulinum toxin A and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum before surgery
Combination of botulinum toxin A and progressive pneumoperitoneum.
Active Comparator: Standard Preparation
Patients undergoing surgical repair without specific preoperative optimization techniques.
Routine preparation without specific optimization techniques.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful Midline Fascial Closure Rate
Time Frame: Intraoperative assessment
Proportion of patients in whom tension-free primary fascial closure is achieved during abdominal wall reconstruction.
Intraoperative assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Complication Rate
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
Overall postoperative morbidity including surgical and medical complications classified by Clavien-Dindo
30 days after surgery
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From operation to discharge (up to 30 days)
From operation to discharge (up to 30 days)
Hernia Recurrence Rate
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
12 months after surgery
Need for Component Separation Technique
Time Frame: Intraoperative assessment
Intraoperative assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia Repair

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin A (Botox )

Subscribe