Discontinuation Versus Continuation of Riociguat Monotherapy in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Successfully Treated With Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (DIRECTION)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare but severe complication of acute pulmonary embolism, characterized by persistent obstruction of the pulmonary arteries by organized thrombi and secondary microvasculopathy. International guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and medical treatment with riociguat, to address the full spectrum of CTEPH lesions. BPA and riociguat are recommended for symptomatic patients with inoperable CTEPH or persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Riociguat is administered before BPA to reduce periprocedural complications by improving pulmonary hemodynamics. While this pre-BPA strategy is well established, post-BPA management is poorly studied, especially in patients achieving therapeutic goals, defined as WHO functional class I or II and near-normal resting pulmonary hemodynamics (70 to 80% of cases). In such cases, riociguat monotherapy is often continued long-term, despite its cost, burden, and potential side effects, which may negatively impact patients' quality of life. Retrospective single-center studies suggest that discontinuation of medical treatment does not lead to significant clinical deterioration. Therefore, we propose conducting a multicenter trial using a PROBE (prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint) design and a Bayesian approach to test if stopping riociguat monotherapy after successful BPA is associated with an acceptably low risk of clinical worsening over a follow-up period of at least one year compared to continuation. The trial will also assess the cost-effectiveness of riociguat discontinuation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Signed informed consent and willingness to accept either discontinuation or continuation of riociguat monotherapy
  • 2. Age ≥18 years
  • 3. Diagnosis of inoperable CTEPH or persistent PH after PEA, with achievement of therapeutic goals following BPA, defined as:

    1. WHO FC I or II
    2. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) < 3 Wood units
    3. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) < 30 mmHg
  • 4. Treatment with riociguat monotherapy for ≥6 months, with stable dose for ≥3 months prior to enrollment
  • 5. Last BPA session performed ≥6 months prior to enrollment
  • 6. 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) ≥ 150 meters
  • 7. For women of childbearing potential: highly effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Background treatment with any PH-targeted therapy other than riociguat, (e.g., any endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), parenteral prostanoids, prostacyclin receptor agonist)
  • 2. Post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, defined as pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) > 15 mmHg
  • 3. Significant obstructive or restrictive lung disease, defined as:
  • FEV₁ < 60% predicted, with FEV₁/FVC < 65%
  • and/or total lung capacity (TLC) < 60% predicted
  • or known significant chronic lung disease on imaging (e.g., interstitial lung disease, emphysema)
  • 4. Severe hepatic impairment, defined as:
  • Child-Pugh class B or C
  • and/or liver aminotransferase levels > 3× upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • 5. Severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • 6. Left heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
  • 7. Ongoing or planned treatment with organic nitrates.
  • 8. Concomitant treatment with strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers (e.g., rifabutin, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, St. John's wort)
  • 9. Concomitant treatment with strong multi pathway P-glycoprotein (P-gp)/ breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors (e.g., lopinavir/ritonavir).
  • 10. Treatment with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, and saquinavir) or a moderate dual CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inhibitor (e.g., fluconazole, amiodarone) or co-administration of a combination of moderate CYP3A4 and moderate CYP2C9 inhibitors.
  • 11. History of life-threatening hemoptysis (>100 mL within 24 hours) or prior bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis
  • 12. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant during the study period
  • 13. Severe comorbidities or underlying conditions with an anticipated life expectancy < 12 months, including active malignancy with localized or metastatic disease
  • 14. Lack of coverage by national health or social security systems
  • 15. Alcohol abuse, as determined by the investigator
  • 16. Any condition or factor likely to interfere with protocol compliance, in the opinion of the investigator
  • 17. Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • 18. Participation in another interventional trial or being in the exclusion period following a previous research involving the human person

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Discontinuation of riociguat
Discontinuation of riociguat after randomization
No Intervention: Control group
Continuation of riociguat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate whether the discontinuation of riociguat monotherapy after successful BPA in CTEPH patients is associated with an acceptably low risk of clinical worsening compared to continuation
Time Frame: At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months

Clinical worsening which is the composite of :

  • death due to any cause,
  • hospitalisation due to worsening including : a) documented right heart failure, b) need for lung transplantation, c) need for intraveinous diuretics/inotropic support or d) need for parental prostanoids
  • decline in 6 minutes walk distance by 15% from baseline, combined with WHO functional class III or IV
At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on WHO functionnal class
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in WHO functionnal class
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on WHO functionnal class
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in Borg dyspnea
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on other clinical measures of pulmonary hypertension
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
Time Frame: Month 12
Change from baseline in Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters :
Time Frame: Month 12
Change from baseline in Right atrial pressure
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters
Time Frame: Month 12
Change from baseline in Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters
Time Frame: Month 12
Change from baseline in Cardiac output
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on quality of life
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on quality of life
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in EmPHasis-10 questionnaire
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To assess the health economic impact of riociguat discontinuation
Time Frame: At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the difference in in quality-adjusted life years (QALYS), for the strategy of riociguat monotherapy discontinuation from the perspective of the French public health system
At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months
To assess treatment burden
Time Frame: Month 12
Change from baseline in Treatment burden questionnaire
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP251608

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CTEPH

Clinical Trials on Discontinuation of riociguat

Subscribe