Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Discontinuation Versus Continuation of Riociguat Monotherapy in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Successfully Treated With Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (DIRECTION)

9 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare but severe complication of acute pulmonary embolism, characterized by persistent obstruction of the pulmonary arteries by organized thrombi and secondary microvasculopathy. International guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and medical treatment with riociguat, to address the full spectrum of CTEPH lesions. BPA and riociguat are recommended for symptomatic patients with inoperable CTEPH or persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Riociguat is administered before BPA to reduce periprocedural complications by improving pulmonary hemodynamics. While this pre-BPA strategy is well established, post-BPA management is poorly studied, especially in patients achieving therapeutic goals, defined as WHO functional class I or II and near-normal resting pulmonary hemodynamics (70 to 80% of cases). In such cases, riociguat monotherapy is often continued long-term, despite its cost, burden, and potential side effects, which may negatively impact patients' quality of life. Retrospective single-center studies suggest that discontinuation of medical treatment does not lead to significant clinical deterioration. Therefore, we propose conducting a multicenter trial using a PROBE (prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint) design and a Bayesian approach to test if stopping riociguat monotherapy after successful BPA is associated with an acceptably low risk of clinical worsening over a follow-up period of at least one year compared to continuation. The trial will also assess the cost-effectiveness of riociguat discontinuation.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

150

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Francia
      • Angers, Francia, 49000
        • CHU Angers
        • Contacto:
      • Bordeaux, Francia, 33600
      • Brest, Francia, 29200
        • Hôpital de la Cavale blanche
        • Contacto:
      • Caen, Francia, 14034
        • CHU Caen
        • Contacto:
          • Emmanuel BERGOT, PUPH
          • Número de teléfono: +33331064677
          • Correo electrónico: bergot-e@chu-caen.fr
      • Clermont-Ferrand, Francia, 63000
      • Dijon, Francia, 21000
      • Grenoble, Francia, 38700
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes
        • Contacto:
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Francia, 94270
        • Hôpital Bicêtre
        • Contacto:
      • Lille, Francia, 59037
      • Marseille, Francia, 13005
        • Hôpital de la Timone
        • Contacto:
      • Marseille, Francia, 13915
        • Hôpital Nord
        • Contacto:
      • Montpellier, Francia, 34295
      • Nantes, Francia, 44800
      • Paris, Francia, 75015
        • Hôpital Europeén Georges Pompidou
        • Contacto:
      • Poitiers, Francia, 86000
      • Rennes, Francia, 35000
      • Rouen, Francia, 76031
      • Saint-Etienne, Francia, 42270
      • Strasbourg, Francia, 67091
      • Toulouse, Francia, 31059
      • Tours, Francia, 37044
        • Hôpital Bretonneau
        • Contacto:
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Francia, 54500
        • Hôpital Brabois
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Signed informed consent and willingness to accept either discontinuation or continuation of riociguat monotherapy
  • 2. Age ≥18 years

  • 3. Diagnosis of inoperable CTEPH or persistent PH after PEA, with achievement of therapeutic goals following BPA, defined as:

    1. WHO FC I or II
    2. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) < 3 Wood units
    3. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) < 30 mmHg
  • 4. Treatment with riociguat monotherapy for ≥6 months, with stable dose for ≥3 months prior to enrollment
  • 5. Last BPA session performed ≥6 months prior to enrollment
  • 6. 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) ≥ 150 meters
  • 7. For women of childbearing potential: highly effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Background treatment with any PH-targeted therapy other than riociguat, (e.g., any endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i), parenteral prostanoids, prostacyclin receptor agonist)
  • 2. Post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, defined as pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) > 15 mmHg
  • 3. Significant obstructive or restrictive lung disease, defined as:
  • FEV₁ < 60% predicted, with FEV₁/FVC < 65%
  • and/or total lung capacity (TLC) < 60% predicted
  • or known significant chronic lung disease on imaging (e.g., interstitial lung disease, emphysema)
  • 4. Severe hepatic impairment, defined as:
  • Child-Pugh class B or C
  • and/or liver aminotransferase levels > 3× upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • 5. Severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • 6. Left heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
  • 7. Ongoing or planned treatment with organic nitrates.
  • 8. Concomitant treatment with strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers (e.g., rifabutin, rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, St. John's wort)
  • 9. Concomitant treatment with strong multi pathway P-glycoprotein (P-gp)/ breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors (e.g., lopinavir/ritonavir).
  • 10. Treatment with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, and saquinavir) or a moderate dual CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inhibitor (e.g., fluconazole, amiodarone) or co-administration of a combination of moderate CYP3A4 and moderate CYP2C9 inhibitors.
  • 11. History of life-threatening hemoptysis (>100 mL within 24 hours) or prior bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis
  • 12. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant during the study period
  • 13. Severe comorbidities or underlying conditions with an anticipated life expectancy < 12 months, including active malignancy with localized or metastatic disease
  • 14. Lack of coverage by national health or social security systems
  • 15. Alcohol abuse, as determined by the investigator
  • 16. Any condition or factor likely to interfere with protocol compliance, in the opinion of the investigator
  • 17. Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • 18. Participation in another interventional trial or being in the exclusion period following a previous research involving the human person

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Experimental group
Discontinuation of riociguat
Droga: Discontinuation of riociguat
Discontinuation of riociguat after randomization
Sin intervención: Control group
Continuation of riociguat

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
To evaluate whether the discontinuation of riociguat monotherapy after successful BPA in CTEPH patients is associated with an acceptably low risk of clinical worsening compared to continuation
Periodo de tiempo: At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months

Clinical worsening which is the composite of :

  • death due to any cause,
  • hospitalisation due to worsening including : a) documented right heart failure, b) need for lung transplantation, c) need for intraveinous diuretics/inotropic support or d) need for parental prostanoids
  • decline in 6 minutes walk distance by 15% from baseline, combined with WHO functional class III or IV
At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on WHO functionnal class
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in WHO functionnal class
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on WHO functionnal class
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in Borg dyspnea
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on other clinical measures of pulmonary hypertension
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Change from baseline in Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters :
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Change from baseline in Right atrial pressure
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Change from baseline in Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on hemodynamic parameters
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Change from baseline in Cardiac output
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
To assess the health economic impact of riociguat discontinuation
Periodo de tiempo: At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the difference in in quality-adjusted life years (QALYS), for the strategy of riociguat monotherapy discontinuation from the perspective of the French public health system
At the longest follow-up, minimum 12 months
To assess treatment burden
Periodo de tiempo: Month 12
Change from baseline in Treatment burden questionnaire
Month 12
To compare the effect of discontinuation versus continuation of riociguat monotherapy on quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months
Change from baseline in EmPHasis-10 questionnaire (scale from 0 (best) to 5 (worst)
Month 3, 6, 12 and every 6 months with maximum of 48 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de enero de 2031

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de enero de 2031

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

1 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

12 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

14 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • APHP251608
  • 2026-525351-81-00 (Ctis)

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir