Effects of Femoral Canal Opening Technique on Biomarkers

June 12, 2026 updated by: Vedran Kovacic, University of Split, School of Medicine

Effects of Femoral Canal Opening Technique on Inflammation, Coagulation, Organ Dysfunction, and Bone Metabolism

This single-centre prospective randomized study consisted of 60 participants (50 women) with a mean age of 80.33 ± 11.13 years, randomly allocated to either manual medullary canal opening (n = 30) or mechanical drilling of the canal (n = 30). Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively during a 72-hour follow-up period. This study had a prospective design. Outcomes were assessed preoperative and during the follow-up period to 72 hours after surgery. During follow-up, all patients underwent laboratory testing. Blood samples were collected 2 hours preoperatively and 72 hours postoperatively in order to determine blood concentrations of leukocytes, erythrocytes, platelets (×10⁹/L), haemoglobin (g/L), D-dimers (IU/L), prothrombin time, international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (s), aPTT ratio, fibrinogen (g/L), creatinine (μmol/L), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (pg/mL), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L), glucose, urea, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorus (mmol/L), as well as bone metabolism markers: total procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (tP1NP) (µg/L), N-min osteocalcin (N-mOST) (µg/L), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) (ng/mL), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (µg/L).

The investigatoras compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours. In addition, the investigators analysed the dynamics (baseline vs. 72 hours) of outcome measures between the two study groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Split, Croatia
        • University Hospital of Split, 21000 Croatia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- adult patients (aged > 18 years) admitted to the Department of Surgery, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Division, University Hospital Centre Split, who, during the observation period, sustained a pertrochanteric femoral fracture following a fall and were scheduled for surgery within 3 days after injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • included patients with acute or chronic inflammatory conditions
  • polytraumatic patients
  • patients with disseminated malignant disease
  • acute organ failure
  • patients on vitamin D and calcium supplementation
  • patients receiving corticosteroids, cytostatics, anticoagulations, or other medications that could influence the observed parameters.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: manual medullary canal opening
Tthe medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a cannulated curved awl (14.0/3.2 mm).
All participants were operated on according to the same protocol, using the same type of procedure on a traction table, with prior fracture reduction under fluoroscopic (X-ray) guidance. All patients had the same type of fracture (pertrochanteric femoral fracture), and intramedullary osteosynthesis was performed using a ⌀ 9.0 mm, 340 mm Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland). In the first group, the medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a cannulated curved awl (14.0/3.2 mm). In the second group, the medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a battery-powered surgical drill equipped with a cannulated drill bit (13.0 mm diameter, 290 mm length) (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland).
Other: mechanical drilling of the canal
The medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a battery-powered surgical drill equipped with a cannulated drill bit (13.0 mm diameter, 290 mm length)
All participants were operated on according to the same protocol, using the same type of procedure on a traction table, with prior fracture reduction under fluoroscopic (X-ray) guidance. All patients had the same type of fracture (pertrochanteric femoral fracture), and intramedullary osteosynthesis was performed using a ⌀ 9.0 mm, 340 mm Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland). In the first group, the medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a cannulated curved awl (14.0/3.2 mm). In the second group, the medullary canal was opened under fluoroscopic guidance using a battery-powered surgical drill equipped with a cannulated drill bit (13.0 mm diameter, 290 mm length) (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The main marker od inflamation
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
CRP (mg/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood cells count
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
blood concentrations of leukocytes, erythrocytes, platelets (×10⁹/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
D-dimers concetration
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
D-dimers (IU/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Coagulation: prothrombin time with international normalized ratio (INR)
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
prothrombin time (seconds)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (seconds)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Fibrinogen concentration
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
fibrinogen (g/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Creatinine concentration
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
creatinine (μmol/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Concetration of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (pg/mL)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Plasma biochemistry
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
glucose, urea, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorus (mmol/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Bone metabolism markers
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
total procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (tP1NP) (µg/L), N-min osteocalcin (N-mOST) (µg/L), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (µg/L)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
Bone metabolism marker C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX)
Time Frame: The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.
C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) (ng/mL)
The investigators compared differences in blood parameters between the two groups at baseline, as well as differences after 72 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vedran Kovacic, University of Split, School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 520-03/25-01/65

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation, Bone Metabolism

Clinical Trials on medullary canal opening

Subscribe