Liposomal Amphotericin B for Invasive Fungal Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients (LAMB-SOT)

June 14, 2026 updated by: Lingai Pan, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

A Real-World Observational Study of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Immunosuppressant Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Invasive Fungal Disease

This real-world observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in solid organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal disease (IFD). IFD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients because of long-term immunosuppressive therapy and increased susceptibility to opportunistic fungal infections.

This is a single-center ambispective cohort study conducted at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital. The study includes a prospective cohort of solid organ transplant recipients receiving L-AmB therapy and a historical control cohort treated with alternative systemic antifungal regimens. Clinical management and treatment decisions will be determined by treating physicians according to routine clinical practice, and no study-specific intervention will be introduced.

The study will collect information on demographic characteristics, transplant type, immunosuppressive regimens, fungal pathogens, infection sites, antifungal treatment strategies, laboratory findings, and clinical outcomes. Particular attention will be given to renal safety, electrolyte abnormalities, and therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents, including tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Drug concentrations, dose modifications, temporary discontinuation, and drug-level abnormalities will be recorded during antifungal therapy.

The primary outcomes are the 28-day clinical response rate and 84-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include mycological clearance, radiological improvement, acute kidney injury, electrolyte disturbances, treatment-related adverse events, hospitalization duration, healthcare resource utilization, and immunosuppressant management characteristics. The study is expected to provide real-world evidence regarding the clinical use of L-AmB in transplant recipients and support optimization of antifungal treatment strategies in this high-risk population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610072
        • Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with proven, probable, or possible invasive fungal disease and treated with liposomal amphotericin B or alternative systemic antifungal therapy at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years.
  • Recipient of a solid organ transplant.
  • Diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) according to EORTC/MSGERC criteria.
  • Receiving liposomal amphotericin B therapy as part of routine clinical care.
  • Provision of informed consent for prospective participants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to amphotericin B formulations.
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT or AST >5× upper limit of normal, or total bilirubin >2× upper limit of normal).
  • Severe renal dysfunction requiring permanent discontinuation of antifungal therapy at baseline.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Participation judged inappropriate by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Liposomal Amphotericin B Cohort
Solid organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal disease receiving liposomal amphotericin B therapy.
Liposomal amphotericin B administered for treatment of proven, probable, or possible invasive fungal disease in solid organ transplant recipients according to routine clinical practice. Dose adjustment and treatment duration are determined by treating physicians.
Other Names:
  • L-AmB
Historical Control Cohort
Historical control patients with invasive fungal disease treated with alternative systemic antifungal regimens.
Alternative systemic antifungal agents including azoles, echinocandins, or other standard antifungal therapies administered according to routine clinical practice in historical control patients with invasive fungal disease.
Other Names:
  • Azoles
  • Echinocandins

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-Day Clinical Response Rate
Time Frame: Day 28
Proportion of participants achieving complete or partial clinical response at Day 28 after initiation of antifungal therapy.
Day 28
84-Day All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Day 84
All-cause mortality occurring within 84 days after initiation of antifungal therapy.
Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mycological Clearance Rate
Time Frame: Day 28
Proportion of participants with documented clearance of fungal pathogens.
Day 28
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Occurrence of acute kidney injury during antifungal treatment.
Baseline through Day 84
Electrolyte Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Occurrence of hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, or other treatment-related electrolyte disturbances.
Baseline through Day 84
Tacrolimus Trough Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Changes in tacrolimus trough concentrations during antifungal therapy.
Baseline through Day 84
Cyclosporine Trough Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Changes in cyclosporine trough concentrations during antifungal therapy.
Baseline through Day 84
Immunosuppressant Dose Modification
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Frequency of dose adjustment, temporary discontinuation, or resumption of immunosuppressive agents.
Baseline through Day 84
Breakthrough Fungal Infection
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Occurrence of breakthrough invasive fungal infection during antifungal therapy.
Baseline through Day 84
Antifungal Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline through Day 84
Permanent discontinuation of antifungal therapy because of treatment-related adverse events.
Baseline through Day 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lingai Pan, MD, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to patient confidentiality and institutional data protection requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opportunistic Infections

Clinical Trials on Liposomal Amphotericin B

Subscribe