- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07676578
Overground Virtual Reality (VR) Gait Rehabilitation for Stroke
Investigating the Feasibility and Translational Therapeutic Benefits of Overground, Fully Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) Gait Rehabilitation Therapies for Stroke Survivors
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After obtaining consent and screening, eligible participants are randomized to the treatment or control groups.
First, all participants are issued a wearable tracker to gauge baseline activity for at least 5 days.
During the intervention phase, participants undergo 12 treatment sessions, 2x a week for 6 weeks.
Assessments are conducted at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-month followup.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Peter Altenburger, Ph.D., PT
- Phone Number: 317-278-0703
- Email: paltenbu@iu.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hee-Tae Jung, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 317-278-1285
- Email: heetjung@iu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Recruiting
- Indiana University Health, Neurorehabilitation & Robotics
-
Contact:
- Peter Altenburger, Ph.D., PT
- Phone Number: 317-278-0703
- Email: paltenbu@iu.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Peter Altenburger, Ph.D., PT
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hee-Tae Jung, Ph.D.
-
Contact:
- Kathryn Gyves, PT, DPT, NCS, CSRS, AVPT, CBIS
- Phone Number: 317-963-7050
- Email: kgyves@iuhealth.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis: Anischemic or hemorrhagic stroke verified by imaging, confirmed by the patient's physician, and 1-6 months post-stroke (subacute phase)
- Motor Impairment Level: Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) 3-5, showing moderate impairment while still allowing safe participation in gait tasks.
- Cognitive Function: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24 or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score >= 20, indicating sufficient cognitive function to participate in the study.
- Exercise Clearance: Approval from a physician for participation in exercise- and VR-based interventions.
- Rehabilitation Need: 10-Meter Walk Test <1.0 m/s, as timed by a PT during screening, indicating a need for functional rehabilitation.
- Consent: Must be able to provide informed consent for themselves.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with uncontrolled cardiovascular, orthopedic, or metabolic conditions or unstable medication regimens that could interfere with their participation in the study.
- Any comorbidity that could interfere with walking or gait training.
- Participation in robot- or VR-assisted gait training within the last 6 months.
- Intolerance to virtual reality environments or motion simulation.
- Severe cognitive, visual, or hearing impairments where the participant cannot follow the therapist's instructions.
- Any other condition deemed unsafe or confounding by investigator, such as pre-existing neurological conditions unrelated to stroke (e.g. Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis), unmanaged pain medications, or acute medical events during the screening period (e.g. recurrent stroke, hospitalization).
- Individuals who score a 12 or higher on the Disability Rating Scale.
- Recent Therapy: Participants should not have received physical therapy (PT) within the last month.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Treadmill-Based VR Gait Therapy
Participants in the control group (VR-CTGT) will engage in gait training using C-Mill VR+ technology, which involves treadmill-assisted walking on a treadmill while interacting with less immersive virtual scenarios presented on screens.
|
Semi-immersive, game-like environments, treadmill gait therapy
|
|
Experimental: VR-Assisted Overground Gait Therapy
Participants in the treatment group (VG-AOGT) will engage in gait training within a newly developed immersive virtual reality (VR) environment.
This setup features self-propelled overground walking influenced by three different virtual environments designed to mimic real-world conditions.
The immersive technology used is HTC VIVE Focus Vision, enabling participants to practice walking in real-world environments and gait tasks.
|
Fully-immersive, real-world environments, overground gait therapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Step Count
Time Frame: Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
FitBit tracks the number of steps (count) taken by participant.
|
Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
|
Travel Distance
Time Frame: Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
FitBit tracks the total distance (miles) travelled by participant.
|
Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
|
Activity Zone Minutes
Time Frame: Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
Fitbit calculates maximum heart rate (HR) from user age (Max HR = 220 - age) and defines Activity Zone thresholds based on percentages of max HR (Fat Burn 50-69%, Cardio/Peak >70%).
Activity Zone Minutes (AZMs) are an intensity-weighted measure of activity.
AZM (count) is based on sustained heart rate over time: 1 AZM per minute in the Fat Burn Zone (50-69% max HR) and 2 AZMs per minute in the Cardio/Peak Zones (>=70% max HR).
|
Continuous tracking from Screening to Week 10
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Step Length
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
With the PKMAS Zeno Walkway (ProtoKinetics), participants walk over a 14-foot pressure mat to capture gait kinematics.
Step length (centimeters) measures the distance between the heel contact point of one foot to the heel contact point of the other foot.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Stride Length
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
With the PKMAS Zeno Walkway (ProtoKinetics), participants walk over a 14-foot pressure mat to capture gait kinematics.
Stride length (centimeters) measures the distance between successive heel contact points of the same foot.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Stance Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
With the PKMAS Zeno Walkway (ProtoKinetics), participants walk over a 14-foot pressure mat to capture gait kinematics.
During the gait cycle, each foot alternates between being in contact with the ground (stance phase) and not in contact with the ground (swing phase).
Stance percentage (percent) is the proportion of the gait cycle during which a foot remains in the stance phase.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
With the PKMAS Zeno Walkway (ProtoKinetics), participants walk over a 14-foot pressure mat to capture gait kinematics.
Gait speed (meters per second) is calculated by dividing the distance walked (meters) by the time taken (seconds).
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
10-Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
10MWT: Subjects will walk a distance of 10 meters at their normal pace while being timed, allowing assessment of gait speed and mobility.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
6MWT: Subjects will walk for 6 minutes along a 30m track.
Subjects may stop and rest as often as needed.
Subject walking speed will be collected during the test to evaluate the rate of functional fatigue.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Dynamic Gait Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
DGI: Subjects will complete 14 different tasks ranging from static standing to dynamic walking.
All subjects will be guarded closely for safety to prevent falling.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
TUG: Subjects will rise from a seated position, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
This test is used to assess mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risk.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Step-Over Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
SOT: Patients will walk over a flat firm surface for 14 meters.
The pathway will include a box that is one foot wide.
Each participant will complete 10 passes, stepping over the obstacle (box) each time.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Interview
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will take part in 30-minute semi-structured interviews to share their thoughts on the user experience (e.g.
engagement, utility, realism) and provide feedback to improve the virtual reality system.
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
|
Quality of Life after Brain Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
Participants will complete the Quality of Life after Brain Injury questionnaire assessing the health-related quality of life specifically tailored for individuals recovering from brain injury.
The questionnaire includes 37 items.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible quality of life and 100 indicating the best possible quality of life; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Disability Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
Participants will complete the Disability Rating Scale questionnaire assessing the level of disability and functional impairment.
The scale includes 8 items.
Scores range from 0 to 29, with 0 indicating no disability and 29 indicating extreme vegetative state; higher scores indicate greater disability and functional impairment.
|
Baseline, Week 7, Week 10
|
|
Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will complete the Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Questionnaire assessing physical symptoms associated with VR exposure, including nausea, dizziness, disorientation, imbalance, fatigue, and visual discomfort.
The questionnaire includes 6 items rated from 1 to 7. Scores range from 6 to 42; higher scores indicate greater cybersickness symptom intensity.
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
|
Igroup Presence Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will complete the Igroup Presence Questionnaire measuring the user's sense of presence and immersion in VR, such as perceived realism and awareness.
The questionnaire includes 14 items using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from -3 to +3.
Negatively worded items will be reverse-scored.
Scores range from -42 to +42; higher scores indicate greater perceived presence.
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
|
Perceived Walking Experience Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will complete the Perceived Walking Experience Questionnaire, which compares walking in VR with real-world walking in terms of comfort, gait differences, headset-related limitation, and safety concerns.
The questionnaire includes 5 items rated from 1 to 5. Scores range from 5 to 25; higher scores indicate a less favorable perceived VR walking experience in relation to real-world walking.
This questionnaire is adapted from Horsak et al. (2021), "Overground Walking in a Fully Immersive Virtual Reality."
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
|
Virtual Reality System Usability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will complete the Virtual Reality System Usability Questionnaire assessing the usability of the VR system, including responsiveness, clarity, learnability, enjoyment, errors, adverse symptoms, and mental burden.
The questionnaire includes 9 items rated from 1 to 5. Negatively worded items will be reverse-scored.
Scores range from 9 to 45; higher scores indicate greater perceived VR system usability.
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
|
NASA Task Load Index
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Participants will complete the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index measuring perceived task workload across mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration.
The questionnaire includes 6 items.
Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater perceived workload.
|
Week 1, Week 4, Week 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hee-Tae Jung, Ph.D., Indiana University, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering
- Principal Investigator: Peter Altenburger, Ph.D., PT, Indiana University, School of Health & Human Sciences; Indiana University Health, Center for Advanced Neurorehabilitation
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 31406
- 1R03HD120509-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaCompletedStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
University Hospital HeidelbergCompletedAcute Ischemic Stroke | Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS | Acute Ischemic Stroke PatientsGermany
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityNingbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital; The Central Hospital of Lishui City; Ningbo... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPost-stroke Seizure | Post-stroke EpilepsyChina
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalRecruitingStroke Rehabilitation | Stroke Rehabilitation and CaregiversTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Walk-over-Ground
-
Indiana UniversityIndiana University HealthNot yet recruitingTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
PSG HospitalsCompletedComparison of Supervised Ground Walk Training and Treadmill Walk Training in COPD Patients (GWT/TWT)Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)India
-
IRCCS San Raffaele RomaAzienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana; I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia; Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus and other collaboratorsCompletedStroke | Acute Stroke | Chronic StrokeItaly
-
Ulsan University HospitalCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKorea, Republic of
-
Craig HospitalCompletedTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedAgingKorea, Republic of
-
Bayero University Kano, NigeriaCompletedStroke | Hemiparesis;Poststroke/CVANigeria
-
Riphah International UniversityActive, not recruitingChronic Stroke PatientsPakistan
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruiting
-
Texas A&M UniversityCompletedCholesterol, LDL | Cholesterol, HDL | Research SubjectsUnited States