Comparison of Three Analgesic Strategies for Hip Fracture Surgery (HIP-3B)

Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Quadro-Iliac Plane Block, Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, and Standard Analgesia Protocol in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Hip fracture surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain and increased opioid requirements. Regional anesthesia techniques may improve analgesia and reduce opioid consumption. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB), Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB), and standard analgesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome is cumulative tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcome measures include postoperative pain intensity, rescue analgesic requirement, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, and patient satisfaction score.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hip fracture surgery is frequently associated with severe postoperative pain, delayed mobilization, and increased opioid consumption. Regional anesthesia techniques have been increasingly used to improve postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid-related adverse effects.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB), Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB), and standard analgesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three study groups.

All surgical procedures will be performed under spinal anesthesia. Patients assigned to the QIPB group will receive ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block, whereas patients assigned to the SIFIB group will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block. Patients in the control group will receive standard multimodal analgesia without a regional block.

The primary outcome measure is cumulative tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesic requirements, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, quality of recovery assessed with the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire, patient satisfaction, intraoperative opioid consumption, and block-related complications.

The study is planned to enroll 90 patients across three centers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia
  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia
  • Allergy to local anesthetics or study medications
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy precluding regional block
  • Cognitive impairment preventing pain assessment
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Revision surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Quadro-Iliac Plane Block Group
Patients assigned to this group will receive ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block in addition to standard multimodal analgesia following hip fracture surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block will be performed following spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The block will be administered in addition to standard multimodal analgesia.
Experimental: Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Group
Patients assigned to this group will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block in addition to standard multimodal analgesia following hip fracture surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block will be performed following spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The block will be administered in addition to standard multimodal analgesia.
Active Comparator: Standard Analgesia Group
Patients assigned to this group will receive standard multimodal analgesia without a regional block following hip fracture surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.
Patients assigned to the control group will receive standard multimodal analgesia without a regional block following hip fracture surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Tramadol Consumption During the First 24 Postoperative Hours
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The total amount of tramadol administered during the first 24 postoperative hours will be recorded and compared among the study groups.
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Intensity at Rest
Time Frame: At 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity at rest will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
At 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Time to First Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Time from completion of surgery to the first administration of rescue analgesia, measured in hours.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Rescue Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
The incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting during the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Score
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Quality of recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.
24 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management will be assessed using a numerical rating scale scored between 0 and 10 at postoperative 24 hours (0 = not satisfied at all, 10 = completely satisfied). Higher scores indicate greater patient satisfaction.
24 hours after surgery
Block-related Complications
Time Frame: During the first 24 hours after surgery.
The incidence of block-related complications, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, hematoma, infection, and persistent sensory or motor deficits, will be recorded.
During the first 24 hours after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenan Kart, Karabuk University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HIP-QIPB-SIFIB-2026
  • 105 (Other Identifier: İstanbul Medipol University Clinical Research Ethics Committee)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will not be made publicly available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fracture

Clinical Trials on Quadro-Iliac Plane Block

3
Subscribe