mTLIP vs QIPB for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery

March 5, 2026 updated by: Merih Yıldız Eglen, Bursa City Hospital

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery

Lumbar instrumentation surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain due to extensive tissue dissection and prolonged muscle retraction during the procedure. Inadequate postoperative pain control may result in delayed mobilization, increased cardiopulmonary complications, and prolonged hospital stay. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques are increasingly used to improve postoperative pain management after lumbar spine surgery. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has been shown to provide effective analgesia for lumbar instrumentation surgery, and its modified technique (mTLIP) has been reported to enhance postoperative pain control. The quadro-iliac plane (QIP) block is a newly described fascial plane block with promising results in lumbar spine surgery. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of the modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and the quadro-iliac plane block in patients undergoing lumbar instrumentation surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar instrumentation surgery is commonly associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain due to extensive tissue dissection and prolonged muscle retraction. Inadequate pain control may lead to delayed mobilization, increased cardiopulmonary complications, and prolonged hospital stay.

Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques, particularly fascial plane blocks, are increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia in lumbar spine surgery. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is an established technique that provides effective analgesia and has been modified to improve its clinical application, resulting in the modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of mTLIP for postoperative analgesia after lumbar instrumentation surgery.

The quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) is a recently described ultrasound-guided fascial plane block. Early reports suggest that QIPB may provide effective analgesia in lumbar spine procedures; however, comparative evidence with established techniques remains limited.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare bilateral ultrasound-guided mTLIP and QIPB performed at the end of surgery in patients undergoing elective lumbar instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia, to evaluate whether QIPB can be considered a safe and effective alternative to mTLIP for postoperative analgesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bursa
      • Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye), 16110
        • Bursa City Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective lumbar instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of anticoagulant medications or presence of bleeding diathesis
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioid drugs
  • Infection at the planned block site
  • Alcohol or drug dependence
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • History of previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Renal or hepatic insufficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block (mTLIP) Group
Participants in this group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (mTLIP) performed at the end of lumbar instrumentation surgery while in the prone position. Under sterile conditions, the ultrasound probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the midpoint of the surgical incision, taking into account the operated lumbar levels. The paraspinal muscles will be identified, and using an in-plane technique, the needle will be advanced into the interfascial plane between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. After confirmation of correct needle placement with saline, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected on each side. The block will be performed bilaterally, with a total volume of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
An ultrasound-guided bilateral fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is injected into the interfascial plane between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles at the operated lumbar levels. The block is performed under sterile conditions at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL per side; total volume 40 mL).
Experimental: Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) Group
Participants in this group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) performed at the end of lumbar instrumentation surgery while in the prone position. Under sterile conditions, a convex ultrasound probe will be placed at the point where the quadratus lumborum muscle attaches to the iliac crest. The erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles will be identified, and correct needle placement will be confirmed with saline injection. Subsequently, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected on each side, with visualization of local anesthetic spread between the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles. The block will be performed bilaterally, with a total volume of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
An ultrasound-guided bilateral fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is injected at the point where the quadratus lumborum muscle attaches to the iliac crest, allowing spread between the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles. The block is performed under sterile conditions at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL per side; total volume 40 mL).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative 48-Hour PCA Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 0-8, 8-16, 16-24, 24-48 intervals
Total amount of opioid delivered by the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device during the first 48 hours after surgery, recorded in milligrams (mg).
Postoperative 0-8, 8-16, 16-24, 24-48 intervals

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QoR-15 Recovery Score
Time Frame: Postoperative 24th and 48th hours

The investigators will use the Turkish version of Quality of Recovery (QoR) / QoR-15 questionairre

PART A How have you been feeling in the last 24 hours? (0 to 10, where: 0 = none of the time [poor] and 10 = all of the time [excellent])

Able to breathe easily Been able to enjoy food Feeling rested Have had a good sleep Able to look after personal toilet and hygiene unaided Able to communicate with Getting support from hospital doctors and nurses Able to return to work or usual home activities Feeling comfortable and in control Having a feeling of general well-being

PART B Have you had any of the following in the last 24 hours? (10 to 0, where: 10 = none of the time [excellent] and 0 = all of the time [poor]) Moderate pain Severe pain Nausea or vomiting Feeling worried or anxious Feeling sad or depressed

Postoperative 24th and 48th hours
Time of first request for rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Despite the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), if the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score is ≥4 at any time point, 0.5 mg/kg intravenous meperidine will be administered as rescue analgesia.
Postoperative 48 hours
Block and Opioid-Related Adverse Effects and Complications
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Block- and opioid-related adverse effects and complications, including but not limited to local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, infection, nerve injury, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, and respiratory depression, will be recorded
Postoperative 48 hours
Dynamic and static Numeric Rating Scale scores
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10; 0= no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt) pain scores at rest or movement at predefined postoperative hours
0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively
Total rescue analgesic dose
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours

Despite the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), if the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score is ≥4 at any time point, 0.5 mg/kg intravenous meperidine will be administered as rescue analgesia.

Total amount of meperidin during the first 24 and 48 hours after surgery, recorded in milligrams (mg).

Postoperative 48 hours
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Patients will remain under observation for at least 2 weeks until their postoperative discharge. Follow-up will be completed upon discharge. The length of hospital stay will be recorded.
Length of hospital stay will be defined as the number of days from the end of surgery to hospital discharge
Patients will remain under observation for at least 2 weeks until their postoperative discharge. Follow-up will be completed upon discharge. The length of hospital stay will be recorded.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block (mTLIP)

Subscribe