Age-Stratified Conditioning Regimen Efficacy for MDS Haplo-HSCT

June 24, 2026 updated by: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People's Hospital

Prospective Cohort Study of Age-Stratified Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimens in Adult Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Receiving Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

This study plan aims to enroll adult patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are scheduled to receive T-cell-replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After obtaining written informed consent, participants will receive either reduced-toxicity Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged ≥55 years) or standard myeloablative modified Bu/Cy+ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged <55 years) followed by unified post-transplant immunosuppression and supportive care. The objective is to prospectively characterize the 1-year transplant-related mortality and comprehensively evaluate hematopoietic engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, infection, relapse, survival outcomes and conditioning-related organ toxicity among all enrolled patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing Lu Daopei Hematology Hospital, Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had low- and intermediate-risk MDS without ISD nor URD receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having ISD or URD; patients having high-risk MDS; patients with active infection; patients with poor compliance; patients with organ failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Age-Stratified Conditioning Regimen
MDS patients without identical sibling donor or unrelated donor would receive haplo-HSCT. Participants will receive either reduced-toxicity Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged ≥55 years) or standard myeloablative modified Bu/Cy+ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged <55 years) followed by unified post-transplant immunosuppression and supportive care.
RTC preconditioning regimen consisted of cytarabine (2g/m2/day, days -10 to -9), busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day on days -8 to -6), cyclophosphamide (1.0 g/m2/day, days -5 to -4), fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day, days -6 to -2), semustine (250 mg/m2, day-3), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin, 2.5 mg/kg/d, days -5 to -2; Sanofi, France). Bu/Cy preconditioning regimen consisted of tandard institutional myeloablative busulfan + cyclophosphamide + rabbit ATG regimen per department routine dosing guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
transplant-related mortality (TRM)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for an expected average of 1 years
Death without disease progression or relapse
Participants will be followed for an expected average of 1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematopoietic engraftment
Time Frame: Day 30 and Day 90 post-transplantation
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of sustained absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥0.5×10⁹/L for 3 consecutive days; platelet engraftment is defined as the first day of sustained platelet count (PLT) ≥20×10⁹/L without transfusion support for 7 consecutive days. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at Day 30 and platelet engraftment at Day 90 will be calculated.
Day 30 and Day 90 post-transplantation
Cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: Day 100 and 3 years after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV and Grade III-IV acute GVHD at Day 100, as well as chronic GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD within 3 years after transplantation, graded per Seattle criteria.
Day 100 and 3 years after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of CMV and EBV reactivation
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as any detectable CMV or EBV viral load elevation requiring clinical intervention within 1 year after transplantation.
1 year after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of hematologic relapse
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as bone marrow blast recurrence or extramedullary disease relapse within 1 year after transplantation.
1 year after transplantation
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as the time from transplantation until hematologic relapse or death from any cause.
1 year after transplantation
Overall survival(OS)
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as the time from treatment until death from any cause or the last follow-up.
1 year after transplantation
Conditioning-related organ toxicities
Time Frame: From conditioning start to Day 30 post-transplantation
Incidence of grade 1-4 cardiac, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal and oral mucosal toxicities from conditioning initiation to Day +30 post-transplantation, with separate analysis of Grade 3-4 severe organ injury, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), and conditioning-related death, graded per WHO organ toxicity scale.
From conditioning start to Day 30 post-transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University Institute of Hematology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RTC Haplo-MDS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on RTC conditioning regimen and Modified Bu/Cy conditioning regimen

3
Subscribe