Functional Movement, Balance, and Strength in Professional and Amateur Soccer Players

July 9, 2026 updated by: Görkem Açar, Istanbul Gelisim University

Comparison of Functional Movement, Dynamic Balance, and Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Between Professional and Amateur Soccer Players

This observational comparative study aims to evaluate differences in functional movement quality, dynamic balance, lower extremity muscle strength, and jumping performance between professional and amateur male soccer players. A total of 144 licensed soccer players (72 professional and 72 amateur) will undergo standardized assessments, including the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Y-Balance Test (YBT), countermovement jump (CMJ), vertical jump (VJ), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength tests, and eccentric hamstring strength assessment using the NordBord system. The findings are expected to improve understanding of how competitive level influences physical performance characteristics and may contribute to the development of evidence-based training, injury prevention, and athlete development strategies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34720
        • Istanbul Gelisim University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of healthy licensed male soccer players actively competing in professional and amateur soccer leagues. A total of 144 participants (72 professional and 72 amateur) were recruited during the competitive season. All participants regularly participated in team training (4-5 sessions per week) and official league matches. The study population was selected to compare functional movement quality, dynamic balance, lower extremity muscle strength, and jumping performance between different competitive levels in soccer.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male licensed soccer players.
  • Professional or amateur soccer players actively competing during the study period.
  • Regular participation in team training (4-5 sessions per week) and official competitions.
  • Ability to complete all physical performance assessments.
  • Provided written informed consent before participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current musculoskeletal injury or pain affecting performance.
  • History of lower-extremity injury preventing full participation in testing.
  • Neurological, cardiovascular, or other medical conditions limiting physical performance.
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete all assessment procedures.
  • Withdrawal of informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Professional Soccer Players
Male licensed professional soccer players competing in professional soccer leagues. Participants underwent assessments of functional movement, dynamic balance, lower extremity muscle strength, eccentric hamstring strength, and jumping performance. No intervention was administered.
Standardized physical performance assessment including the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Y-Balance Test (YBT), countermovement jump (CMJ), vertical jump (VJ), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength tests, and eccentric hamstring strength assessment using the NordBord system. No therapeutic or experimental intervention was administered.
Amateur Soccer Players
Male licensed amateur soccer players competing in amateur soccer leagues. Participants underwent the same assessment protocol as the professional group. No intervention was administered.
Standardized physical performance assessment including the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Y-Balance Test (YBT), countermovement jump (CMJ), vertical jump (VJ), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength tests, and eccentric hamstring strength assessment using the NordBord system. No therapeutic or experimental intervention was administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
The total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score was used to evaluate overall functional movement quality and identify movement limitations in professional and amateur soccer players.
Baseline (Day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Y-Balance Test (YBT) Performance
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Dynamic balance performance assessed using normalized reach distances in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.
Baseline (Day 1)
Countermovement Jump (CMJ) Height
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Lower-extremity explosive power measured as countermovement jump height using the Witty Microgate system.
Baseline (Day 1)
Vertical Jump (VJ) Height
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Vertical jump performance assessed using the Witty Microgate system.
Baseline (Day 1)
One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Maximum lower-extremity strength assessed using one-repetition maximum squat and deadlift tests.
Baseline (Day 1)
Eccentric Hamstring Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Maximum eccentric hamstring force and inter-limb asymmetry assessed using the NordBord system.
Baseline (Day 1)
Individual Functional Movement Screen Components
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Scores for the seven Functional Movement Screen subtests, including deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability.
Baseline (Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IGU-FMS-2025-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Athletic Performance

Clinical Trials on Physical Performance Assessment

3
Subscribe