Brief Title: Portable 3D Visual Material-Supported Simulation Training for Cervical Dilation Assessment

July 14, 2026 updated by: Ayşegül Şimşek, Marmara University

Accessible Simulation Approaches: The Effect of Portable Three-Dimensional Visual Material-Supported Education on University Students' Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based education supported by a portable and mobile three-dimensional (3D) visual material on university students' knowledge of cervical dilation assessment, learning satisfaction, self-confidence in learning, and perceptions of simulation design. Undergraduate health sciences students were randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving simulation training with the portable 3D material in addition to standard education or a control group receiving standard education alone. The primary outcome was change in knowledge of cervical dilation assessment. Secondary outcomes included student satisfaction, self-confidence in learning, and perceptions of simulation design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a parallel-group, 1:1 allocation randomized controlled trial with a pretest-posttest design conducted among third-year undergraduate health sciences students enrolled in the Pregnancy and Care course. Participants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization sequence with allocation concealment through sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes.

Both groups received the standard theoretical and laboratory curriculum on cervical dilation assessment. In addition, participants allocated to the intervention group received simulation-based training supported by a portable and foldable three-dimensional cervical dilation educational model designed to facilitate repeated individual practice outside the simulation laboratory. Students practiced with the model seven times throughout the semester using a standardized educational protocol delivered by the same instructor.

The educational material was specifically developed to provide an accessible, reusable, and portable simulation resource that allows repeated psychomotor practice without requiring permanent simulation laboratory access. The study evaluated whether supplementing standard education with repeated practice using the portable three-dimensional model improves educational outcomes compared with standard education alone. The trial was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT reporting guideline, and no protocol modifications were made after trial initiation. Ethical approval and written informed consent were obtained before participant enrollment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34854
        • Marmara University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate student enrolled in the Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Enrolled in the Pregnancy and Care course during the study period
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not participate in any stage of the educational intervention
  • Did not complete the post-intervention assessments
  • Did not complete the study questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants received the standard theoretical and laboratory education plus simulation-based training supported by a portable and mobile three-dimensional visual cervical dilation educational material. Students practiced with the portable material once every two weeks throughout the semester.
Simulation-based education supported by a portable and mobile three-dimensional visual educational material designed for cervical dilation assessment. Participants practiced with the material repeatedly throughout the semester in addition to standard education.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants received the standard theoretical instruction and laboratory education on cervical dilation assessment without the portable three-dimensional educational material.
Standard theoretical instruction and laboratory training on cervical dilation assessment delivered as part of the regular curriculum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cervical Dilatation Assessment Knowledge Test (CDAK) Score
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention
Change in knowledge regarding cervical dilation assessment measured using the Cervical Dilatation Assessment Knowledge Test (CDAK). Developed by the researchers in accordance with the literature. To assess the test's content validity, it was submitted for review to 10 experts in the field, including academics and healthcare professionals (physicians, midwives, and nurses). In the test, each correct answer was scored as 1 point, and each incorrect answer as 0 points. The experts were asked to evaluate the items using a three-point rating scale (1 = Necessary, 2 = Useful but not necessary, 3 = Unnecessary) based on the Lawshe technique. In addition, experts who selected the "Should be corrected" option were asked to provide suggestions for corrections to the relevant item, while those who selected the "Should be removed" option were asked to provide their reasons for removal. As a result of the Lawshe technique, the content validity ratio (CVR) was found to be 0.79 (p<0.05).
Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention
Student satisfaction measured using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (Satisfaction subscale). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with learning. Scale was developed in 2006 and adapted into Turkish in 2017. The scale consists of 12 items and 2 subscales (Satisfaction with current learning = 5 items, Self-confidence in learning = 7 items). The scale is a five-point Likert type with no reverse-scored items (1 = Strongly Disagree; 5 = Strongly Agree). The total SSSS score is obtained by dividing the sum of the subscale scores by the number of items. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction and self-confidence. The total Cronbach Alpha value of the scale is reported as 0.95, and in our study, it was found to be 0.95 immediately after the training and 0.95 14 weeks after the training.
Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention
Simulation Design Perception
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention
Students' perceptions of simulation design measured using the Simulation Design Scale (SDS). Higher scores indicate more positive evaluations of the simulation design. Scale, developed in 2006 and adapted into Turkish in 2017. The scale consists of 20 items and 5 subscales (Goals and information=5 items, Support=4 items, Problem Solving=5 items, Feedback=4 items, and Realism=2 items). The scale is evaluated in two sections. The first section assesses whether the best simulation design elements are applied in the simulation application. The second section evaluates the degree to which simulation design elements are important for students.
Immediately after completion of the 14-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aysegul Simsek, PhD, Marmara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Assessment, Self

Clinical Trials on Portable 3D Visual Material-Supported Simulation Training

Subscribe