Application of Super-Resolution Ultrasound (SRUS) in Liver Tumor (SRUS)

July 12, 2026 updated by: WenLi Zhang, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

The macroscopic vascular supply of liver tumors varies considerably according to histological subtype, lesion size, and disease stage. Current clinical imaging modalities primarily characterize liver tumors based on their macroscopic vascular perfusion patterns. Conventional color Doppler ultrasonography enables qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity, facilitates the differentiation of benign from malignant hepatic lesions, delineates the anatomical relationship between tumors and major intrahepatic vessels, and detects vascular invasion. Nevertheless, these macroscopic vascular characteristics arise from complex microvascular architectures, including vascular distribution patterns, microvessel density, vessel morphology and tortuosity, blood flow velocity, and flow direction. Despite the critical role of tumor microcirculation in tumor progression and therapeutic response, the heterogeneity of microvascular hemodynamics among different liver tumors remains inadequately characterized.

The emergence of Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging (SRUS) has markedly advanced ultrasound imaging by overcoming the acoustic diffraction limit, enabling visualization of microvessels with diameters as small as approximately 20 μm. Unlike conventional ultrasound techniques, SRUS preserves the inherent advantages of ultrasound, including deep tissue penetration and a large field of view, while achieving an approximately tenfold improvement in spatial resolution. This unique combination effectively bridges the long-standing gap between imaging depth and spatial resolution in vascular imaging. Furthermore, by localizing and tracking individual circulating microbubbles,SRUS enables quantitative assessment of microvascular blood flow velocity over a broad dynamic range without Doppler angle dependence. Consequently, super-resolution ultrasound imaging offers an unprecedented opportunity to characterize and compare the microvascular hemodynamic features of benign and malignant liver lesions, thereby improving the accuracy of preoperative differential diagnosis, tumor staging, therapeutic response assessment, and prognostic evaluation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The macroscopic vascular supply of liver tumors varies considerably according to histological subtype, lesion size, and disease stage. Current clinical imaging modalities primarily characterize liver tumors based on their macroscopic vascular perfusion patterns. Conventional color Doppler ultrasonography enables qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity, facilitates the differentiation of benign from malignant hepatic lesions, delineates the anatomical relationship between tumors and major intrahepatic vessels, and detects vascular invasion. Nevertheless, these macroscopic vascular characteristics arise from complex microvascular architectures, including vascular distribution patterns, microvessel density, vessel morphology and tortuosity, blood flow velocity, and flow direction. Despite the critical role of tumor microcirculation in tumor progression and therapeutic response, the heterogeneity of microvascular hemodynamics among different liver tumors remains inadequately characterized.

The emergence of Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging (SRUS) has markedly advanced ultrasound imaging by overcoming the acoustic diffraction limit, enabling visualization of microvessels with diameters as small as approximately 20 μm. Unlike conventional ultrasound techniques, SRUS preserves the inherent advantages of ultrasound, including deep tissue penetration and a large field of view, while achieving an approximately tenfold improvement in spatial resolution. This unique combination effectively bridges the long-standing gap between imaging depth and spatial resolution in vascular imaging. Furthermore, by localizing and tracking individual circulating microbubbles,SRUS enables quantitative assessment of microvascular blood flow velocity over a broad dynamic range without Doppler angle dependence. Consequently, super-resolution ultrasound imaging offers an unprecedented opportunity to characterize and compare the microvascular hemodynamic features of benign and malignant liver lesions, thereby improving the accuracy of preoperative differential diagnosis, tumor staging, therapeutic response assessment, and prognostic evaluation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Liver tumor patients treated in the outpatient and inpatient departments of the Third Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Any gender, 18 years or older;
  2. People newly diagnosed with liver tumors, including:

    ① Hepatocellular carcinoma; ② Cholangiocarcinoma; ③ Liver metastases; ④ Liver hemangioma; ⑤ Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver.

  3. Need to have a contrast-enhanced ultrasound as part of routine care;
  4. Willing to join this study and sign the informed consent after discussing it with the doctor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. During the data collection process, if the participant is unable to cooperate fully, preventing the collection from being completed;
  2. If the skin in the collection area is broken or scabbed, or if there's too much ascites in the abdominal cavity interfering with sound signal penetration, making data collection impossible;
  3. Previous puncture biopsy or other treatments for existing liver malignant tumors;
  4. Patients with a history of allergy, allergic constitution, or severe intolerance to sulfur hexafluoride or other components of the ultrasound contrast agent;
  5. Patients who refuse to participate in this study;
  6. Any uncontrollable comorbidities that could limit the patient's adherence to the study requirements or affect their ability to sign the written informed consent;
  7. Poor overall condition or inability to tolerate relevant examinations;
  8. Participants whom the researcher deems unsuitable for inclusion in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observation group
Patients newly diagnosed with benign or malignant liver tumors
Perform super-resolution ultrasound imaging on the study population, record and calculate characteristic hemodynamic and morphological parameters, and analyze microvascular flow patterns.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascular parameters in different types of benign and malignant liver tumors
Time Frame: At the time of initial diagnostic imaging (baseline), with pathological confirmation from subsequent surgical resection or biopsy obtained during the same hospitalization period.
Assessing the differences in vascular parameters between different types of benign and malignant liver tumors
At the time of initial diagnostic imaging (baseline), with pathological confirmation from subsequent surgical resection or biopsy obtained during the same hospitalization period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in treatment effectiveness between patient subgroups
Time Frame: From date of treatment initiation until the date of first documented pathological or imaging response assessment, assessed up to 12 months

Treatment effectiveness is assessed using two different methods depending on the treatment modality:

Pathological assessment (for patients who undergo surgical resection):

A. Pathological complete response (pCR): no viable tumor cells detected in the postoperative specimen; B. Major pathological response (MPR): ≥50% reduction in the proportion of viable tumor cells compared to the baseline pretreatment specimen;

Imaging assessment based on mRECIST criteria (for patients who do not undergo surgery):

A. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions B. Partial Response (PR): ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable target lesion C. Progressive Disease (PD): ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of viable target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment started D. Stable Disease (SD): insufficient decrease to qualify for PR, and insufficient increase to qualify for PD

From date of treatment initiation until the date of first documented pathological or imaging response assessment, assessed up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hui Liu, Professor, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Clinical Trials on Perform super-resolution ultrasound imaging on the study population

3
Subscribe