FST Analysis Supporting Timely Therapy and Risk Assessment Via Clinical Decision Support for Kids (FAST TRACK)

July 17, 2026 updated by: Natalja Stanski, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Furosemide Stress Test Implementation and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children at High Risk for Acute Kidney Injury: A Hybrid Study

The goal of this study is to learn whether adding a clinical decision support tool to the electronic medical record helps clinicians use the furosemide stress test in critically ill children at high risk for severe acute kidney injury (AKI). The main question it aims to answer is: Does implementing the decision support tool reduce fluid overload and help predict which children will receive dialysis?

Researchers will identify children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit who are at high risk for AKI using risk stratification and biomarker testing, then compare outcomes in the two years after the tool is introduced with the two years before.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill children, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a mainstay of treatment for severe AKI. Delayed initiation of CRRT is associated with worse outcomes, but because CRRT carries risks, tools are needed to identify which patients will truly benefit from early initiation. Through previous work, the investigators have developed, tested, and integrated an AKI risk-stratification tool (the Renal Angina Index, RAI) and a urine biomarker (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL) to identify patients at risk for developing severe AKI. The furosemide stress test (FST), previously validated in adults, measures urine output after a standardized dose of furosemide and may help predict which patients will receive dialysis versus those who can be managed medically. However, despite existing clinical decision support, fewer than half of eligible patients currently undergo an FST, suggesting that implementation varies by clinician preference rather than patient factors.

The investigators will follow a cohort of patients admitted to the PICU who are identified as being at high risk for developing severe AKI through RAI and NGAL screening. Using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design, the aim is to develop and implement a clinical decision support intervention that standardizes FST use in this population, evaluate whether this intervention is acceptable and feasible to clinicians, and determine its impact on patient outcomes. Outcomes in the two years after implementation will be compared with the two years before, with the primary outcome of reducing fluid overload. The investigators will also assess whether urine flow rate after the FST predicts receipt of CRRT and confirm that performing the FST does not increase the need for blood-pressure support.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Recruiting
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Natalja L Stanski, MD, MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Imogen Clover-Brown, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill patients admitted to the PICU at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center identified as being high risk for developing AKI (RAI+/NGAL+)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)
  • Renal Angina Index (RAI) greater than or equal to 8 (RAI+)
  • Urine NGAL greater than or equal to 150 ng/mL (NGAL+)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of renal replacement therapy prior to PICU admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Post-Implementation Cohort
All patients with RAI greater than or equal to 8 (RAI+) and NGAL greater than or equal to 150 ng/mL (NGAL+) in the two years after the clinical decision support tool is implemented. These patients will be compared to the cohort of patients with RAI greater than or equal to 8 and NGAL greater than or equal to 150 ng/mL in the two years before the clinical decision support (CDS) tool is implemented.
The CDS strategy will be developed with key stakeholders in the Cincinnati Children's PICU, leveraging existing infrastructure and workflows. This CDS intervention will then be implemented as part of routine care in the PICU.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Day 7 Fluid Accumulation
Time Frame: 2 years
Median Day 7 percent fluid accumulation will be compared between eligible patients in the 2 years post-implementation and the 2 years pre-implementation. Percent fluid accumulation will be calculated as cumulative fluid balance (in liters) divided by baseline body weight (in kilograms) multiplied by 100 to obtain a percentage.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation Acceptability, Feasibility, and Fidelity
Time Frame: 2 years
Acceptability to clinicians, feasibility to implement within PICU workflows, and fidelity of delivery of intervention will be assessed. Acceptability and feasibility will be measured with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and Feasibility of Intervention measure (FIM) tools. Results of each tool will be analyzed to determine the mean and standard deviation of each question and summary scores for the complete tool. Fidelity will be assessed by comparing the proportion of RAI+/NGAL+ patients who receive an FST in the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period. Barriers and facilitators to fidelity of our intervention will be explores using semi-structured interviews (SSIs) and RedCap surveys of clinicians.
2 years
Change in ICU Free Days
Time Frame: 2 years
Median ICU free days will be compared between eligible patients in the 2 years post-implementation and the 2 years pre-implementation. ICU free days will be calculated as 28 days minus the total number of days in the ICU with patients who die before day 28 assigned 0.
2 years
Change in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Use
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of CRRT use, timing of initiation, and duration between eligible patients in the 2 years post-implementation to the 2 years pre-implementation.
2 years
Change in Vasoactive Inotropic Score after FST
Time Frame: 2 hours
For patients who undergo FST, change in Vasoactive Intropic Score (VIS) will be compared from immediately before FST to 2 hours after FST. This will serve as a balancing measure to evaluate safety of intervention.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Our regulatory approval allows for sharing of de-identified data for future research, if applicable or warranted. Currently, we have no plans or agreements in place to share the data with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury

Clinical Trials on Furosemide Stress Test Clinical Decision Support Tool

3
Subscribe