This Exploratory Medical Device Study Evaluated the Arrhythmia Diagnostic Yield of MEMO Patch V2, a Wearable Patch-type Electrocardiographic Monitor, in Adults With Suspected Arrhythmia Who Presented With Symptoms Such as Palpitations or Dizziness, or Who Had Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke or Transient

July 20, 2026 updated by: HUINNO Co., Ltd

A Multicenter, Non-randomized, Controlled, Open-label Pilot Clinical Trial to Compare and Evaluate the Arrhythmia Diagnostic Performance of MEMO Patch V2 and 24-Hour Ambulatory Electrocardiography in Patients With Suspected Arrhythmia Presenting With Palpitations or Dizziness

This exploratory medical device study evaluated the arrhythmia diagnostic yield of MEMO Patch V2, a wearable patch-type electrocardiographic monitor, in adults with suspected arrhythmia who presented with symptoms such as palpitations or dizziness, or who had cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The diagnostic yield of MEMO Patch V2 was compared with that of conventional 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter monitoring). The study also assessed ECG signal quality, participant compliance, usability and satisfaction, and skin-related adverse events. The findings were intended to provide preliminary data for planning a future large-scale clinical study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a multicenter, non-randomized, controlled, open-label pilot clinical trial conducted at Korea University Anam Hospital and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Adults aged 19 to 80 years who required ECG monitoring because of suspected arrhythmia associated with palpitations or dizziness, or because of cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, were eligible. All participants underwent simultaneous application of a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor and MEMO Patch V2 on Day 0. The Holter monitor was removed and returned on Day 1, while MEMO Patch V2 continuously recorded a single-channel ECG for up to 14 days and was returned by courier. Participants attended an end-of-study visit on Day 21 ± 3 days. Effectiveness was evaluated by comparing arrhythmia detection rates and by assessing ECG signal quality, participant compliance, and device usability and satisfaction. Safety was evaluated based on skin-related adverse events occurring at the application site. A total of 150 participants were enrolled; the Full Analysis Set included 147 participants, the Per-Protocol Set included 141 participants, and the Safety Set included 150 participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, South Korea, 02841
        • Korea University Anam Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 19 to 80 years.
  2. Participants who required ECG monitoring because of suspected arrhythmia associated with symptoms such as palpitations or dizziness; or participants with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
  3. Participants able to wear MEMO Patch V2 for 14 days.
  4. Participants who received a detailed explanation of the study, fully understood it, and voluntarily provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic reactions to adhesive products.
  2. Participants who required inpatient management during the study because of atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, another clinically significant condition as determined by the investigator, or a history of dehydration or syncope within 1 year before screening.
  3. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, made the participant unsuitable for study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MEMO Patch V2 and 24-Hour Holter Monitoring
Participants underwent simultaneous ECG monitoring with MEMO Patch V2 for up to 14 days and a conventional Holter monitor for 24 hours.
MEMO Patch V2 is a wearable, single-channel patch-type ECG monitoring device intended for long-term ambulatory ECG recording. The device was applied on Day 0 and used for continuous ECG monitoring for up to 14 days. ECG data were stored and transferred for review through the MEMO ECG Webviewer. Electrode patches were replaced every 24 hours, and the device was returned by courier after monitoring.
Other Names:
  • MEMO Patch
A conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitor was applied simultaneously with MEMO Patch V2 on Day 0 and used for continuous ECG recording for approximately 24 hours. The device was removed and returned at the clinical site on Day 1.
Other Names:
  • Holter Monitor
  • 24-Hour Ambulatory ECG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arrhythmia Detection Rate (%)
Time Frame: From device application on Day 0 through completion of MEMO Patch V2 monitoring, up to 14 days
The proportion of participants diagnosed with at least one arrhythmia using MEMO Patch V2 was compared with the proportion diagnosed using the 24-hour Holter monitor. Arrhythmias included premature atrial contraction, premature ventricular contraction, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, sinus pause, and other arrhythmias. Comparisons included the total monitoring periods (Holter: 24 hours; MEMO Patch V2: at least 7 days) and the first 24 hours for both devices.
From device application on Day 0 through completion of MEMO Patch V2 monitoring, up to 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECG Signal Quality
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
The percentage of analyzable MEMO Patch V2 recording time after excluding noise signals.
Up to 14 days
Participant Compliance
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Compliance was calculated as actual wear time, excluding lead-off time, divided by the required total wear time of 336 hours, multiplied by 100.
Up to 14 days
Usability and Satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 21 ± 3 days
A 10-item questionnaire was scored on a 5-point scale and converted to a total score ranging from 0 to 100.
Day 21 ± 3 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: From Day 0 through Day 21 ± 3 days
Number and percentage of participants with skin-related adverse events at the MEMO Patch V2 application site.
From Day 0 through Day 21 ± 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jong-Il Choi, MD, Division of Cardiology, Korea University Anam Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Il-Young Oh, MD, Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data collected in this study are not planned to be shared with external researchers. Any future sharing would require separate sponsor approval and compliance with applicable privacy, ethical, and institutional requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transient Ischemic Attack

Clinical Trials on MEMO Patch V2

Subscribe