- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07731178
Cryoneurolysis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)
July 23, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health
Evaluating the Efficacy of Preoperative Cryoneurolysis With Iovera on Postoperative Pain, Function, and Opioid Use Following ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft
The purpose of this research study is to assess whether cryoneurolysis will help control pain after ACLR surgery and decrease the need of opioid medications.
The primary objective is to compare postoperative functional recovery between Iovera and sham arms at 1 month after ACLR.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
150
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Layne Estes
- Phone Number: 646-501-7208
- Email: Layne.estes@nyulangone.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Eric J. Strauss, MD
- Phone Number: 646-501-7208
- Email: Eric.strauss@nyulangone.org
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-45 years
- Scheduled for primary ACLR with BPTB autograft
- Willingness and ability to participate in Iovera
- No chronic opioid use preoperatively
- No known neurologic disorders affecting the lower extremity
- Capacity and willingness to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up schedules
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior surgery on the affected knee.
- Non-English speaking if validated PRO instruments at the site are only available in English; include validated translations if available and approved.
- Contraindications to cryoneurolysis (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria, Raynaud's phenomenon, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria) or to local anesthetics.
- Active skin infection, dermatitis, or compromised skin integrity at or near treatment sites.
- Bleeding diathesis or anticoagulant therapy not compatible with minor percutaneous procedures per institutional policy.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Known peripheral neuropathy or significant sensory deficit of the target region.
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, increases risk or interferes with participation
- Concomitant use of other opioid drugs or prior chronic use.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ioveraº cryoneurolysis study group
Participants will receive the ioveraº cryoneurolysis intervention before surgery.
|
The device includes a hand-held piece, charging port with cord, and disposable components: the nitrous oxide capsule and a small probe called the Smart Tip, which has needles that administer the cold to the nerve.
It works immediately by freezing nerves that transmit pain signals to reduce pain transmission after surgery.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Placebo study group
Participants will have a sham intervention that does not have cryoneurolysis before surgery.
|
The placebo/sham device looks just like the ioveraº device, but does not contain cyoneurolysis or any treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 Month
|
The KOOS survey is comprised of 42 questions.
The questions are divided into 5 sub-categories: symptoms (7 questions), pain (9 questions), function/daily living (17 questions), function/sports and recreational activities (5 questions), and quality of life (4 questions).
The total range for each sub-category is 0-100, making the total range for the whole survey 0-500.
The higher the score, the worse the symptoms and pain/ higher difficulty in function.
|
Baseline, 1 Month
|
|
Difference in Lysholm knee scoring scale (LKSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 Month
|
The Lysholm knee scoring scale is a 100-point patient-reported questionnaire designed to assess functional knee ligament injuries.
It evaluates eight areas - limp, support, locking, instability, pain, swelling, stair climbing, and squatting - with higher scores (up to 100) indicating better function.
|
Baseline, 1 Month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain score
Time Frame: Baseline, Post-operative Day 1
|
VAS is a tool widely used to measure pain.
A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity (most commonly) along a 10 mm horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge (=VAS score).
The total score range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the higher the score, the worse the pain.
|
Baseline, Post-operative Day 1
|
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3
|
VAS is a tool widely used to measure pain.
A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity (most commonly) along a 10 mm horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge (=VAS score).
The total score range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the higher the score, the worse the pain.
|
Baseline, Week 3
|
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
VAS is a tool widely used to measure pain.
A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity (most commonly) along a 10 mm horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge (=VAS score).
The total score range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the higher the score, the worse the pain.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Post-operative Day 1
|
A segmented, numbered version of the VAS.
Patients select a whole number from 0 to 10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is the "worst pain imaginable"
|
Baseline, Post-operative Day 1
|
|
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3
|
A segmented, numbered version of the VAS.
Patients select a whole number from 0 to 10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is the "worst pain imaginable"
|
Baseline, Week 3
|
|
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
A segmented, numbered version of the VAS.
Patients select a whole number from 0 to 10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is the "worst pain imaginable"
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Cumulative opioid consumption as measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME)
Time Frame: Up to 21 days post-operative
|
Up to 21 days post-operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eric J. Strauss, MD, NYU Langone Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 23, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
July 28, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 28, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 23, 2026
Last Verified
July 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-00771
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
This is a single-site device study.
The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 to 36 months after publication or as required by a condition of awards or supporting agreements, provided the requesting investigator executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health.
This instance of data sharing will also require separate IRB review as well as review from NYU Langone's Data Sharing Strategy Board (DSSB).
Requests should be directed to layne.estes@nyulangone.org.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.