This Study Compares Two Noninvasive Dynamic Tools: Lung Ultrasound and Transthoracic Echocardiography Using LVOT VTI. It Aims to Measure the Sensitivity and Specificity of LUS in Guiding Fluid Resuscitation and Early Detection of Fluid Responsiveness and to Prevent Volume Overload (lvotvti)

August 27, 2026 updated by: Ain Shams University

Comparing Lung Ultrasonography and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral for Early Detection of Fluid Overload After Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock Patients

Reliability of the LVOT-VTI versus lung ultrasonography for early detection of fluid intolerance during fluid resuscitation of septic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Early detection of fluid accumulation syndrome in septic shock patients using velocity time integral. To decrease the incidence of fluid accumulation syndrome.

  • To assess the feasibility and time required for each imaging modality in guiding fluid resuscitation.
  • Comparison of the time required for point-of-care lung ultrasound versus LVOT-VTI to guide fluid resuscitation decisions.

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of lung ultrasonography (B-Lines) in predicting fluid non responsiveness in septic shock patients

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patient with septic shock applied by inclusion & exclusion criteria .

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with septic shock.
  2. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg.
  3. Need fluid resuscitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient <18 years.
  2. Refusal of patient or relative to participate in the study.
  3. Other types of shock.
  4. Morbid obesity.
  5. Valvular heart disease including severe aortic and mitral stenosis) and (severe aortic and mitral regurgitation).

7.Patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced Ejection fraction. 8.Burn patients. 9.End stage renal disease with regular hemodialysis patient. 11.Patients with massive pleural effusion. 12. patients with septic cardiomyopathy. 13.patients with massive ascites. 14. patient on high positive end expiratory pressure or with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 15. Patients with right ventricular failure & pulmonary hypertension. 16. Patients with pneumonia and interstitial lung diseases. 17. Ventilated patients. 18. Poor echo window patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Early detection of fluid accumulation syndrome in septic shock patients using velocity time integral versus lung ultrasound
Time Frame: 12 hours
12 hours
Early detection of fluid accumulation syndrome in septic shock patients using velocity time integral ursus lung ultrasound.
Time Frame: 12 hours
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Walid Youssef Kamel, Associate Professor, AinShams university
  • Study Director: Heba Mohamed El-Serwi, Professor, AinShams university
  • Study Director: Marwa Mamdoud El-Far, Assistant Professor, AinShams university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe