Airway Bundle With Gastric Ultrasound Guidance for Aspiration Prevention During Emergency Intubation in Assiut University Hospital.

September 15, 2026 updated by: Abdelrahman Mahmoud Shehata, Assiut University

Emergency endotracheal intubation is a high-risk procedure performed frequently in critically ill patients, with major complications, including pulmonary aspiration, reported across a substantial proportion of cases (1). Reported aspiration incidence after ED intubation varies widely with definition and case-mix, from as low as 3.5% in early retrospective series (2) up to 22% in trauma-heavy cohorts (3). Aspiration pneumonia specifically has been documented in roughly 8% of contemporary prospective ED intubation cohorts (4), and failure on the first intubation attempt is independently associated with a higher likelihood of aspiration and other adverse events (5).

Aspiration is one of the must-pay-attention-to risk factors in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation due to its linked mortality and morbidity (6). The induction and paralytic agents used in endotracheal intubation weaken the protective airway reflexes and the lower esophageal sphincter tone that can lead to aspiration of the gastric content (6).

Point-of-care gastric ultrasound (GUS) has been a reliable tool to assess gastric content preoperatively and in the Emergency Department (7). Previous studies mentioned the use of GUS as a qualitative tool (Perlas criteria) and as a quantitative tool using the Cross-Sectional Area of the Antrum (CSA) in the supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions (7,8). CSA can be calculated by a known formula, CSA = (AP × CC) x π/4, where AP is the anteroposterior diameter and CC is the craniocaudal diameter (7). Gastric volume can be calculated with CSA and the age of the patient using the Perlas formula, GV = 27.0 + (14.6 × CSA) - (1.28 × Age) (7). The Perlas formula applies only to non-pregnant adults whose BMI is less than 40 (8). The Perlas grading system and CSA-based volume model have subsequently been validated against gastroscopically-suctioned gastric volumes in adult surgical patients (9), and combining the qualitative grade with the CSA-derived volume has been shown to sharply improve discrimination of a full stomach, with a pre-test probability of 50% rising to roughly 98% following a positive scan (10). GUS has multiple studies assessing its diagnostic accuracy and its association to aspiration (11); nevertheless, it hasn't been studied as a guide to the airway management of patients with the risk of aspiration undergoing endotracheal intubation.

The present trial asks the next question: among ED trauma patients found to have a high risk of aspiration during endotracheal intubation, does a focused, low-resource bundle lower the rate of aspiration, compared with standard unstructured practice?

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged ≥ 18 years, presenting to the ED with a trauma-related indication and requiring urgent or semi-urgent endotracheal intubation, as determined by the treating emergency physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● Allergy to local anesthetics, muscle relaxants, sedatives or dexmedetomidine.

    • History suggestive of intestinal obstruction or gastric outlet obstruction.
    • Known pregnancy.
    • Morbid obesity.
    • History of gastric/esophageal surgery.
    • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or any other pathology affecting the physiology or function of the gastrointestinal tract or the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).
    • Patients in cardiac or respiratory arrest or any patients requiring crash intubation.
    • Patients with a gastric or duodenal tube in situ.
    • Anticipated difficult airway for reasons unrelated to aspiration risk (e.g., known airway tumor), where bundle elements would be superseded by a dedicated difficult-airway protocol.
    • Patients with vertebral and spinal trauma.
    • Clinically evident aspiration prior to gastric ultrasound assessment (e.g., witnessed aspiration before ED arrival).
    • Anticipated interval between the gastric ultrasound scan and induction exceeding 30 minutes, where a significant change in gastric content cannot be excluded.
    • Patients/guardians not consenting to take part in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: study group
Gastric ultrasound scan
A low-frequency curvilinear probe is used. The patient is scanned in the right lateral decubitus position (or supine, if positioning is limited - for example, due to spinal precautions).
No Intervention: control group
routine (standard) airway management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidance of peri-intubation aspiration
Time Frame: within 72 hours
direct visualization of gastric contents in the oropharynx or airway during laryngoscopy/intubation.
within 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GUS Aspiration Prevention

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe