Comparative Effects of Multiple Angle Isometrics vs Standard Isometric Exercise in Lateral Epicondylitis

September 28, 2026 updated by: Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Comparative Effects of Multiple Angle Isometrics vs Standard Isometric Exercise in Lateral Epicondylitis:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lateral Epicondylitis is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions affecting 1-3% of population.Various terminologies are used to describe the disease like tendinitis of extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle (ECRB), periostitis and radial epicondylitis, lateral epicondylitis is still the most used terminology in literature. Research shows that LE mainly targets population which is active with poor nutrition habits and biomechanical faults thus affecting their job and social life. Pain is seen to be activity dependent and is triggered via excessive muscle activity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) is a frequent musculoskeletal condition, which involves pain, decreased grip strength and functional impairments due to a degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Despite the fact that isometric exercises are widely applied in the conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis for their analgesic and strengthening properties, the most effective way of isometric training is not known. Multiple Angle Isometric (MAI) exercises are designed to engage a larger number of muscle fibres, increase neuromuscular activation and strengthen muscles across their entire range of motion than single angle isometric exercises.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the effectiveness of the Multiple Angle Isometric (MAI) exercise to reduce pain, strengthen the wrist extensor muscles and increase upper limb function in patients with lateral epicondylitis when compared with the Standard Isometric (SI) exercise. The total number of participants is 36 with acute and sub acute lateral epicondylitis and will be sampled by non-probability purposive sampling and divided into two intervention groups by random allocation. All subjects will then be given the same initial treatment (hot pack and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation [TENS]) and then their respective exercise protocols. The intervention will take place three times a week for four weeks.

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be used to assess pain intensity, Camry digital hand dynamometer to assess wrist extensor grip strength, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to assess functional disability. Measurements will be taken pre- and post- and post-4 weeks after completion of the intervention. This study's results will give physiotherapists evidence for comparative effectiveness of the Multiple Angle Isometric and Standard Isometric exercise protocols to choose the most effective rehabilitation approach for lateral epicondylitis and optimal patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 4000
        • Akbar Niazi Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adults aged 25-35 years.
  • Clinically diagnosed with acute or subacute lateral epicondylitis.
  • Patients with ≥3 out of the following 5 positive clinical tests:
  • Pain on palpation over the lateral epicondyle.
  • Cozen's test positive.
  • Mill's test positive.
  • Maudsley's test positive.
  • Acute or subacute clinical presentation.
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Cervical spine disorders.
  • Chronic lateral epicondylitis.
  • Elbow deformity (fracture, previous surgery, contracture, etc.).
  • Diabetes mellitus.
  • Steroid injection at the lateral epicondyle within the previous 3 months.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or other neurological or muscular disorders.
  • Previous elbow injury.
  • Arthritic changes or calcifications around the elbow joint on radiographs. Malignancy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Corticosteroid injection to the lateral epicondyle within the previous 6 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A-Multiple Angle Isometrics (MAI)

Participants will be given baseline treatment with a hot pack and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), then the exercises will be therapist-supervised multiple angle isometric wrist extensors at neutral, 15° and 30° wrist extension. There will be 3 sets of 10 repetitions for each exercise with 6-second hold (Weeks 1-2) followed by 12-second hold (Weeks 3-4) with 1-minute rest between sets, 3 times per week, 4 weeks total.

Baseline treatment with a hot pack and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), then the exercises will be therapist-supervised multiple angle isometric wrist extensors at neutral, 15° and 30° wrist extension. There will be 3 sets of 10 repetitions for each exercise with 6-second hold (Weeks 1-2) followed by 12-second hold (Weeks 3-4) with 1-minute rest between sets, 3 times per week, 4 weeks total.

Active Comparator: Group B - Standard Isometric Exercise

Participants will get the same baseline treatment (hot pack and TENS) and then do therapist supervised standard isometric wrist extensor exercises at a single (neutral) wrist position, with the same dosage and frequency (3 sets × 10 repetitions, 6-second hold during Weeks 1-2, 12-second hold during Weeks 3-4, 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks).

Baseline treatment (hot pack and TENS) and then do therapist supervised standard isometric wrist extensor exercises at a single (neutral) wrist position, with the same dosage and frequency (3 sets × 10 repetitions, 6-second hold during Weeks 1-2, 12-second hold during Weeks 3-4, 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week2 , Week 4

Assesses pain intensity using an 11-point numerical scale (0-10).

Baseline, Week2 , Week 4
Grip Strength (Camry Digital Hand Dynamometer)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Week

Assess wrist extensor grip strength using a digital hand dynamometer.

Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Week
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Week

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a standardized tool that relies on patient-reported outcomes to evaluate function and disability in the upper limbs. It includes 30 questions designed to assess how symptoms affect daily tasks and physical abilities. Scores are calculated on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher values reflect more severe disability.

Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Fatima Mughees, DPT, Akbar Niazi Teaching Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe