To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists (Avenue-PDR)

November 2, 2026 updated by: Swansea Bay University Health Board

Assessing the Viability of Non-medical Practitioners Conducting Photocoagulation for PDR (AVENUE-PDR): A Feasibility Trial

To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity.

To assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists in performing laser treatment in line with the established protocols.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Swansea, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Swansea Bay University Health Board: Ophthalmology Department, Singleton Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People with diabetes
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
  • Aged18 years or over
  • New referrals

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Follow up appointments i.e. treatment already started
  • Eye complications which may make laser treatment difficult
  • Vitreous haemorrhage
  • Dense media opacity
  • Eye care complications which prevent a view of the retina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Opthalmologist

Trained non-medical professionals (eye care practitioners (ECPs)) performing laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and the potential impact on service capacity

Other: Trained non-medical professionals (eye care practitioners (ECPs)

Trained non-medical professionals (eye care practitioners (ECPs)) performing laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and the potential impact on service capacity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the feasibility of a full clinical trial comparing trained Eye Care Professionals with ophthalmologists in performing laser treatment in line with the established protocols
Time Frame: from enrollment to the 6 month follow up visit

Feasibility will be assessed using pre-specified progression criteria relating to:

ECP participation and training completion, participant recruitment, follow-up completion, intervention compliance and retention of clinical equipoise. We will use Red, Amber, Green criteria to determine whether a larger scale trial can be done

from enrollment to the 6 month follow up visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
estimate participant recruitment and retention rates.
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to provide an estimate of the consent rates and retention rates by counting the number of patients screened and approached and how many consented. Of those, we will determine how many remained for the full 6 months and if patients withdrew or were lost to follow up we will determine when this occured and, where possible, why

from baseline to 6 month visit
assess completeness and quality of outcome data collection.
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to assess how well data is collected and how accurate it is by conducting a data cleasning exercise in the database to identify which data are missing and any outliers suggesting data is inaccurate

from baseline to 6 month visit
evaluate the feasibility of intervention delivery by trained ECPs
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to evalaute whether it is feasible for trained ECPs to deliver the treatment and whether patients accept them. this will include assessing (usign RAG criteria) whether ECPs agree to take part

from baseline to 6 month visit
assess the acceptability of the intervention and trial processes to participants and stakeholders.
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to assess whether patients consent and remain in the trial and whether stakeholders can adhere to the protocol

from baseline to 6 month visit
describe clinical outcome distributions to inform the design of a future definitive trial
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

we will determine how will various clinical data items are collected in terms of availability and accuracy to determine whether they are suitable for a larger scale study which may use one as the basis for a sample size calculation. Data include number of laser sessions, visual acuity, central retinal thickness, sight loss/retention and various patient questionnaires

from baseline to 6 month visit
assess the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcome and resource-use measures
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to determine whether participants complete the questionnaires provided and which questions are missed out / incorrecty completed. We will run missing data reports on the questionnaires to track patterns relating to problematic questions and identify outliers which may be incorrect data

from baseline to 6 month visit
explore the resource use and cost drivers associated with ECP-delivered and ophthalmologist-delivered care pathways.
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 month visit

to collect data related to recourse use and other cost drivers associated with the novel treatment pathway using ECPs to determine whether there are cost savings to be made in using ECPs to deliver laser treatment

from baseline to 6 month visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRAS 347120

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe