- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT05223933
Proactive Community Case Management (Pro-CCM) in Rural Madagascar (Pro-CCM)
Randomized Cluster Trial to Measure the Effectiveness of Home Care in Hyperendemic Rural Areas in Madagascar
The trial took place in a rural area hyper endemic for malaria, the hypothesis of which was that active detection and treatment of malaria in the population (all ages combined) in the event of a positive test could reduce the prevalence of malaria in the region. zoned. It was a two-armed, randomized, cluster-based community intervention trial:
- one arm with home treatment of malaria for the duration of the study for patients with a positive result in the rapid diagnostic test for malaria.
- a control arm with the usual malaria management procedures (ie consultation with community workers or the nearest health centers in the event of fever or suspected signs of malaria).
Before the start of monitoring, an initial survey (Baseline) was carried out in the "fokontany" (villages / cluster) included in the 2 arms, in order to determine the prevalence of malaria. Then, in the intervention arm, screening for malaria by RDT every 2 weeks in subjects with a suspected malaria case (fever or notion of fever in the 2 days preceding the visit) and treatment with Artesunate-amodiaquine (ACT) for patients with a positive RDT. At the end of the follow-up period, a final survey (Endline), based on the same questionnaires as during the Baseline, was carried out in the 2 villages of the 2 arms.
As a secondary objective, a study on anemia in women aged between 15 and 49 years was also carried out during the baseline and endline periods in order to compare the prevalence between the 2 periods
Přehled studie
Postavení
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Detailní popis
This study aims to compare the prevalence of malaria in the rural community of Mananjary after the Malaria Home Care Program (PECADOM Plus).
The study will take place in fokontany rural communes of the district of Mananjary.
This district was chosen for the following reasons:
- High prevalence of malaria in this area (31% in subjects with fever and attending medical consultation in the CSB included in the sentinel IPM fever site)
- presence of Peace Corps Volunteers (PCV) in this district. Mananjary District is situated in southeastern Madagascar, located in the central part of the Vatovavy Fitovinany Region, in the province of Fianarantsoa. It is located at 21°13'52" South and 48°20'31" East. The district is composed of one urban commune and 28 rural communes. After obtaining the agreement of the ethics committee for the realization of the study, the coordinator or the assistant coordinator of the project will make courtesy visits to all administrative and health officials in the Vatovavy Fitovinany and Mananjary District (Regional Directorate, District Chief ...).A random draw of fokontany meeting the inclusion criteria will be carried out later, to identify the distribution of fokontany in the intervention arm and control arm in the project. In addition to the 22 fokontany required, a draw of 8 reserve fokontany will be made (4 for each arm).
A courtesy visit will be conducted in the fokontany raffled. The coordinator will check the number of inhabitants in these fokontany with the information gathered at the time of the preparation of the protocol (projection of the population according to the data of INSTAT, information from the Medical Inspector of Mananjary). If the fokontany will not be eligible, the reserve fokontany will replace them in the study.
Typ studie
Zápis (Aktuální)
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní místa
-
-
: Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany
-
Mananjary, : Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Andranomavo
-
-
Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambakoana
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambalamanasa
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambalaromba
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambinany Namorona
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Amboditandroho
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambohimiarina II
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambohinihaonana
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ambolotara
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Andranomiteka
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Anilavinany
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Ankazotokana
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Anosimparihy
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Kianjavato
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Mahavoky Sud
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Manotro
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Maroamboka
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Sahafotahina
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Sandravakoka
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Tanambao Sud
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Tanambaobe
-
Mananjary, Fianarantsoa, Vatovavy Fitovinany, Madagaskar, 317
- Fokontany Tsarahafatra
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria in community:
- Fokontany in rural communes of Mananjary district (fokontany level of safety, accessibility by the study teams, and phone network availability was assessed).
- Agreement of the chief of Fokontany for the participation of his fokontany in the study
- Fokontany with at least 1,000 inhabitants
Individual inclusion criteria:
- Resident in the relevant areas during the study period and consenting to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria in community:
- Fokontany with a total population of less than 1000 inhabitants
- Fokontany in an urban commune
- Fokontany in an area whose access is risky and perilous
- Individual exclusion criteria:
None (Non-resident present at the time of passage were tested in the study if they have suggestive signs of malaria but they were considered as visitors)
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Výzkum zdravotnických služeb
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Experimentální: Intervention fokontany
|
CHWs in the intervention arm conducted door-to-door fever screening for all inhabitants of all consenting households in their catchment area every fortnight.
All individuals with temperature ≥ 37.5°C or history of self-reported fever in the previous two weeks were tested with an RDT; positive individuals who were not pregnant and did not have signs of severe disease were treated with artesunate-amodiaquine according to treatment guidelines.
Individuals identified as requiring a referral during Pro-CCM visits were assisted with transfer to the healthcare center, with transportation handled by the project staff.
|
|
Žádný zásah: Control fokontany
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary endpoint of the study was the change in the prevalence of malaria RDT positivity in the intervention versus control fokontany.
Časové okno: an average of 1 year
|
Difference in differences (DiD) approach comparing baseline to endline is used to compare the prevalence of malaria RDT positivity in the 2 arms
|
an average of 1 year
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
percent of households visited every two weeks
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of households visited every two weeks out of the number of the households registered in initial census
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
percent of households gave consent
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of households that were visited every two weeks and gave consent for the screening during each visit
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
Fever incidence
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of fever cases out of all individuals screened during each visit
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
Malaria incidence
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of persons with positive RDT and fever cases out of all individuals screened during each visit
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
fever cases with RDT performed
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of fever cases with RDT performed
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
RDT-positive persons treated with an ACT
Časové okno: The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
percent of RDT-positive persons treated with an ACT during each visit
|
The event was assessed up to 30 weeks (15 biweekly visits).
|
|
The change in the prevalence of anemia in women aged between 15 and 49 years old in the intervention versus control fokontany
Časové okno: an average of 1 year
|
Difference in differences (DiD) approach comparing baseline to endline is used to compare the prevalence of anemia in the 2 arms
|
an average of 1 year
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Spolupracovníci
Vyšetřovatelé
- Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Rila Ratovoson, MD, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar
- Ředitel studie: Milijaona Randrianarivelojosia, PhD, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar
Publikace a užitečné odkazy
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- 2017-01
Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)
Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?
Popis plánu IPD
Časový rámec sdílení IPD
Kritéria přístupu pro sdílení IPD
Typ podpůrných informací pro sdílení IPD
- PROTOKOL STUDY
- ICF
- CSR
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .
Klinické studie na Proactive community case management
-
Mayo ClinicNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)DokončenoStenóza karotidSpojené státy, Kanada, Izrael, Španělsko, Austrálie