Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Ultrasound Guided Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Postoperative Pain.

19. februar 2016 opdateret af: Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Effectiveness of Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain Management After Ambulatory Thumb Resection Arthroplasty.

The aim of this clinical trial is to determinate if distal ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks on target nerves (radial and median nerve blocks at the elbow), using low volume and low concentration of long acting local anesthetic provide better postoperative pain control compare with systemic analgesia alone after thumb resection arthroplasty (TRA) due to a prolonged selective sensitive block on the tissue trauma.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

We designed a prospective randomized controlled trial, with nursing blinded evaluation.

We enrolled 52 patients scheduled for elective ambulatory TRA. 2 patients were excluded after randomization. Patients were randomized into two groups:

A. Group A= no distal peripheral nerve blocks (no dPNBs group; n = 24 ): We performed usual anesthetic technique for surgery: an AXILLARY BRAQUIAL PLEXUS BLOCK using SHORT ACTING local anesthetic (mepivacaine 1%). Patients allocated in this group didn't received any additional intervention in the postoperative period.

B. Group B (dPNBs group; n = 26): We performed the same anesthetic technique for surgery (AXILLARY BLOCK with 1% of mepivacaine) with an additional intervention. Patients allocated in this group received postoperatively dPNBs on target nerves. Based on surgical approached and technique we evaluated that radial and median nerves were responsible for the innervation of the surgical area, and therefore responsible for the postoperative pain. We performed dPNBs ON RADIAL AND MEDIAN NERVES (TARGET NERVES) WITH LONG ACTING AND LOW CONCENTRATION LOCAL ANESTHETIC (0,125% levobupivacaine 5ml/nerve).

All blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance.

Analgesic regime prescribed at discharge was the same in both groups: dexketoprofen with tramadol for rescue analgesia.

The primary outcome was to evaluate the proportion of patients experienced moderate to severe pain during first and second day postoperatively, mesured using a numerical visual scale (NVS) of 0 to 10 (0= no pain and 10= worst pain imaginable). We defined mild pain (NVS 0-3), moderate pain (NVS 7-10) and severe pain (NVS 7-10).

We considered dPNBs effective when patients experienced mild pain (NVS 0-3) for at least 6 hours after dPNBs puncture.

Secondary outcomes included:

  1. Maximum pain intensity during first and second day postoperatively.
  2. Duration of dPNBs, defined as the interval between dPNBs performance and the occurrence of first pain.
  3. Time to discharge, defined as the interval since patient arrived at postoperative care unit (PACU) until discharge home.
  4. Presence of distal hand motor block after dPNBs puncture.
  5. Needed for rescue analgesia and total consumption of tramadol during first and second day postoperatively
  6. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting during 1st and 2nd day postoperatively
  7. Needed for rescue antiemetic therapy, total consumption of ondansetron and effectiveness of treatment during 1st and 2nd day postoperatively.

Patients were contacted by phone first and second day postoperatively from a blinded PACU nursing staff (all outcome data were collected by PACU nursing staff blinded to group allocation).

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

52

Fase

  • Fase 4

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Spanien
      • Barcelona, Spanien, 08025
        • Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age more than 18 years.
  • Ambulatory TRA.
  • Free acceptance to participate in the study, with informed consent signed by patient, guardian or family member.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Pregnancy.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics/NSAIDs
  • Preexisting chronic pain treated with opioids.
  • Neuropathy involving the extremity undergoing surgery or neurological-cognitive deficits that may interfere in the assessement.
  • Contraindications to dPNBs

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Ingen indgriben: No dPNBs group
Patients in this group didn't receive any intervention in the postoperative period.
Eksperimentel: dPNBs group

Patients in this group received ultrasound guided dPNBs on radial and median nerves (target nerves of TRA) in the postoperative period, before discharge.

The procedural objective of dPNBs was to place local anesthetic around the target nerves to achieve a long lasting, sensitive and selective block in the surgical area. dPNBs were performed with 5 ml/nerve of levobupivacaine 0,125%.

Ultrasound guidance allowed us to verify the correct distribution of LA around the target nerves target and optimize needle position if it was necessary, always avoiding the intraneural injection.
Medicin: Levobupivacaine
In dPNBs group, we performed ultrasound guided dPNBs on radial and median nerves using low concentration and low volume of long acting local anesthetic (0.125% levobupivacaine, 5 ml per nerve). Using low concentrations of levobupivacaine on target nerves could achieve a prolonged sensitive block in the surgical area without motor block of the hand.
Andre navne:
  • long acting local anesthetics

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Proportion of Patients Who Experienced Moderate to Severe Pain During First and Second Postoperative Day
Tidsramme: Up to 48 hours
Pain scores assessed using pain numerical visual scale (NVS) of 0-10 (o= no pain and 10= worst pain imaginable). We defined mild pain (NVS 0-3); moderate pain (NVS 4-6) and severe pain (NVS 7-10).The analysis of this variable at the end of the study will confirm or not the effectiveness of dPNBs for management of postoperative pain after TRA.
Up to 48 hours

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Maximum Pain Intensity, Rescue Analgesia, Nausea and Vomiting Incidence, Use of Ondansetron for NVPO, Efectiveness of Ondansetron
Tidsramme: Up to 48 hours
Number of participants with Maximum pain intensity NVS > 3; Rescue analgesia; Nausea and Vomiting incidence; use of ondansetron for NVPO; Ondansetron being effective (number of participants for whom ondansetron was effective to stop NVPO).
Up to 48 hours

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Mireia Rodriguez, anesthesia, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2012

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. april 2014

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. april 2014

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. maj 2012

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. maj 2012

Først opslået (Skøn)

14. maj 2012

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

21. marts 2016

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

19. februar 2016

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2016

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • IIBSP-LEV-2011-21

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

Uafklaret

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner